If the WWE were smart they would sign Mark Angelosetti aka Mr.Touchdown and bring him in as Jack Swaggers little brother let him keep the gimmick and attire.
The General Wrestling Thread
Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
-
-
Comment
-
Donald Trump vs Vince McMahon is the match you are looking for with the bold.
Probably because after that WrestleMania broke records thanks in part to the Tyson boost, business reached new heights with Austin on top. Then after the ill advised Austin heel turn, business steadily declined.
There is no question Austin was the biggest star and biggest draw of that era. Triple H, Foley, HBK, Undertaker, even The Rock, whoever you want to talk about, none of them drew anything like Austin, the numbers bear that out, even if some of them more than drew their share on their own (Rock). Why didn't the Rock ever touch the numbers he did with Austin, with Triple H or Undertaker or whoever else? Because they weren't Austin.
The NWO popped WCW, then Sting & Goldberg legit drew at times, and it all fell apart due to bad booking. It wasn't going to last forever, its always cyclical, but the booking didn't set up the next era of stars and it died as a result.
WWE is better off now, where the brand draws. It's easier this way. I don't know if it was by design, but it's a better model. Austin helped them reach that point that biss is talking about, where there are die hards now that are likely never going away. Hogan didn't achieve that. WWF nearly died at points in between Hogan & Austin. Without Austin, business isn't nearly as good in the Cena era, but it's healthy as fuck and in no danger of folding up shop.
Austin is the reason Vince is still in business, Austin is the reason he was able to go public, and Austin is the reason the brand is so strong. That's why I say Austin is the biggest star in the history of the business. He not only peaked higher than Hogan, and drew more money than Hogan, but he left the company in far better shape when he left.
Austin was the top guy during an era of wrestling where the wrestling product had a very high demand and a very large market share. Was that on Austin or was that just the demand for the product. I think we say "Austin was the biggest draw everrrrr" but really don't have too much to quantify it outside of him being the top guy during the biggest period. I just think the measures to quantify such a thing are a bit skewed.Comment
-
The WWE really should let guys use the superkick I'm not sure if anyone on the main roster uses it.Comment
-
When the WWE was pulling those 6's during the ratings war...it wasn't just Austin at the top...hell, Austin's more influential runs at the top where when RAW was behind Nitro. Hell, it was right after the Undertaker won the title they pulled that 7.2. When they pulled that famous 8.1, the main event starred EVERYONE (it was Stone Cold, the Rock, H's, Taker, Vince, and Shane.
Austin was the top guy during an era of wrestling where the wrestling product had a very high demand and a very large market share. Was that on Austin or was that just the demand for the product. I think we say "Austin was the biggest draw everrrrr" but really don't have too much to quantify it outside of him being the top guy during the biggest period. I just think the measures to quantify such a thing are a bit skewed.
Ratings, buyrates, revenue, you name it, you can quantify Austin as a draw buy any measure you wish to use. I think WWE overtakes WCW at some point anyway, because WCW was going to self destruct regardless, but Austin won that war way before WCW did the majority of their self inflicted damage.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
What do you mean we have nothing to quantify it? Business boomed to unprecedented heights after they gave him the ball, and then it fell back down to earth after they turned him heel. And then not a single person you named in that post ever drew as well without Austin ever again unless you count Vince vs Trump or Rock vs Cena at the WrestleMania's, but I think we all agree that WrestleMania draws as a collective these days. Austin drew his WrestleMania's because he was Austin, not because he was Austin at WrestleMania.
Ratings, buyrates, revenue, you name it, you can quantify Austin as a draw buy any measure you wish to use. I think WWE overtakes WCW at some point anyway, because WCW was going to self destruct regardless, but Austin won that war way before WCW did the majority of their self inflicted damage.
People simply credit Austin for the boom period and high market share of the product, when, it was more of a group effort by all involved on the national level...both by the WWF and WCW.Comment
-
This thing we are doing with these people that may or may not Draw http://acwtourdates.blogspot.com/201...at-mohawk.htmlComment
-
I will say that I really dig Cesaro's uppercut finisher. The few I've seen it performed on looks really nasty (the angles they caught last night of Gabriel on the receiving end were pretty good).
Twitch Channel
http://www.twitch.tv/krulmichael20
Season I: 10-6 (NFC North Champions)
Season II: 9-7 (NFC North Champions)
Season III: 13-3 (NFC Champions)
Season IV: 11-5 (NFC North Champions)
Season V: 2-1
Comment
-
It's more of a setup move. His finisher is The Neutralizer which is pretty cool as wellComment
-
You have nothing to quantify it by...there is nothing substantial outside of t-shirt sales that really claim Austin to being the reason for the biggest boom in wrestling. Business boomed for EVERYONE during the same era Austin had the ball. It was an inflation of the market share of wrestling. As I mentioned, the WWE had several stars during the same era that were popping ratings and were the "top guy" during the boom. Even when WCW was starting to lose the battle they were pulling near-high ratings and buyrates. When Triple H was champion he was popping top WrestleMania buyrates and 7 ratings at the top.
People simply credit Austin for the boom period and high market share of the product, when, it was more of a group effort by all involved on the national level...both by the WWF and WCW.
What more do you need to "quantify" it? Where is the disconnect? Austin drew more money than anybody in the history of the business over his five year run on top. An he was the catalyst, end of story, not even debate worthy, because things got hot when he was put on top, and didn't cool off until they turned him heel and gave The Rock the ball as the top face, a move that backfired badly and that the company tried to rectify but was unable to recover from.
Of course those other guys contributed, but wrestling was as hot as it was because of Austin. What did Foley ever draw before the Austin boom? The Rock got the ball in 2001 and things dipped, until they panicked and reversed the Austin turn. Triple H? Lol please. Who else? Michaels? Just stop. Undertaker? Again, his biggest drawing years were as an Austin foil.
Austin drew the most money, drew the biggest buyrates (until the "collective era" WM shows of today), sold the most merch, and sold out the most house shows. What more do you want, lol.Comment
-
The biggest boom in the history of wrestling started when Austin beat HBK at WM with Tyson as the ref. The Austin led WWF blew past WCW and broke all sorts of records and drew more money than any other period of any other promotion ever. The biggest boom in the history of wrestling effectively ended at WrestleMania 2001 when Austin turned heel and the crowd took a shit on it.
Comment
Comment