If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
If you are having trouble accessing your account and don't remember your password, email help@virtualsportsnetwork.com and i'll get you an updated password for 2024.
I would almost say, run Cena vs Bryan II at WMXXX. Bryan is the most over guy right now, Cena is the machine. Could you just imagine 80,000+ doing the yes chant just before he hits the knee and wins the title?
At this point, Bryan either fights Cena or Undertaker. Anyone else would be a pure waste.
All you need to know when thinking of the NHL vs Madden series is the two people involved in making the games.
That pan out shot of everyone synonymously doing the YES! chant gave me goosebumps. If they don't give Bryan a main event match at WM it'll be a damn travesty.
Season I: 10-6 (NFC North Champions)
Season II: 9-7 (NFC North Champions)
Season III: 13-3 (NFC Champions)
Season IV: 11-5 (NFC North Champions)
Season V: 2-1
I actually see Bryan as the only guy the WWE has had in a long long time that could legit beat the Undertaker, and yet still have the longevity to use that push to be the companies #1. That's the problem with Takers streak, there really isn't anyone worth while that could beat him that is realistic enough. Granted after HBK and HHH, you basically have made it so no one can beat him. Bryan to me would see like the perfect option, bring in HBK for a "I couldn't do it, and I trained you" little segment, and again you have the WWE's biggest underdog doing what no one thought he could do.
All you need to know when thinking of the NHL vs Madden series is the two people involved in making the games.
Why? When they put him in there with talented performers, he delivers. He is better than all but maybe...10 guys on the roster...and more over than all but 5?
You waste him and put him in there with shit like Johnny Curtis, you get shit. He is there to put guys over and with the talent that is above a C- in the ring, he delivers.
Blame the talent that doesn't get over in the 320 days they have before Jericho shows up for guys like Jericho coming in and grabbing a pay day.
Curious why you're bashing Fandango/Johnny Curtis. I thought their match was solid, and the next night on RAW, I loved those drunk Brits doing the Fandango. That RAW, in my opinion, was the most interesting episode all year. I get that I'm not the wrestling geek some of you guys are, but that RAW was compelling and I thought Jericho/Curtis-Fandango was fine.
Curious why you're bashing Fandango/Johnny Curtis. I thought their match was solid, and the next night on RAW, I loved those drunk Brits doing the Fandango. That RAW, in my opinion, was the most interesting episode all year. I get that I'm not the wrestling geek some of you guys are, but that RAW was compelling and I thought Jericho/Curtis-Fandango was fine.
He's got a shitty gimmick and he can't go in the ring. The Jericho-Fandango match was filled with botch spots and terrible communication between the two.
I actually see Bryan as the only guy the WWE has had in a long long time that could legit beat the Undertaker, and yet still have the longevity to use that push to be the companies #1. That's the problem with Takers streak, there really isn't anyone worth while that could beat him that is realistic enough. Granted after HBK and HHH, you basically have made it so no one can beat him. Bryan to me would see like the perfect option, bring in HBK for a "I couldn't do it, and I trained you" little segment, and again you have the WWE's biggest underdog doing what no one thought he could do.
Beating The Undertaker at WrestleMania is the only truly "pass the torch" moment they have in the tank.
Comment