LiquidLarry2GhostWF
Highwayman
Not this shit again.
I've made my case against Martin a million times over the years. If you wanted a guy to get 3 or 4 yards and fall down, Martiin was your man. He started every week, never got hurt, and was consistant. Those arent bad things, but there was nothing dynamic or special about his game. He was better than a lot of guys in his era, but the idea he is an all time great is something I can't accept.
I'm on the fence with Bettis, because he was the premeir short yardage back of his era, and at his peak was a much better player than Martin. Martin never really peaked, he just played every game, got a lot of carries, got his 3 or 4 yards per pop, and quietly went away. There are a million guys I would NEVER put in the HOF who i'd rather have on my team than Martin, like T. Davis, Ricky Watters, Roger Craig, Fred Taylor, etc. Martin was never even close to the best RB during his era, but Bettis was in the conversation from 1996-1999 or so.
Martin was a nice player, your classic stat compiler. Not a game changer, not an all time great.
You can not be "on the fence" with Bettis, but say "no" to Martin.
Martin gets in before Bettis. Bettis was never in any conversation...quit lying.
Bettis' best years were in an era with Emmitt, Barry, Marshall Faulk, Terrell Davis, Ricky Watters, Eddie George...he was never in any conversation.