Just some random thoughts...
You TO backers need to take a longer look. Id like to compare him to Irvin for a second as they are so physically close yet deliver such different results. TO accumulated alot of garbage time numbers and just preyed on shitty CBs for such a long stretch of his career. Im not saying he wasn't elite. But of all the top guys at the time TO consistently had trouble with top guys. As physically dominant as he was at the LOS you could play a shot game with the amount of shorted routes ,and alligator armed attempts he'd have up the middle. He was an all or nothing guy. If a CB got to him early TO would mentally checkout for long stretches. Sadly I think his first year run with the Eagles may have been an anomaly that threw people off. Because that was IMO his most consistent season. But before and certainly after the guy refused to perform in big games. Cowboys two seasons in a row watched season altering plays slip through his hands in crunch time. TO got progressively mediocre when important moments crept up. Whats crazy is that he's open on most of these plays. Its some weird mental blank this guy was shooting. He'd do everything right and suddenly.....incomplete then stare at the sky and give his QB the stare. Ugh.. Hes not top 10 when you mix in locker room cancer status. If durability is your criteria then go ahead.
On the other hand you have Irvin a guy who epitomized that physical dominance TO gets raves over. How many of the top WRs can say they had to face 2 HOF CBs and 2 others who were elite level (Aeneas , Green , Taylor , Allen) 6 times a year. Not only did he not struggle he excelled against them. Green was basically his bitch twice a year , Aenas , and Allen were often chew toys. A couple of shots against Rod Woodson & Deion Sanders ? Three 150+ yard games against them. I mean seriously who the hell else other than Moss/Rice can say they faced
that level of competition and somehow played
that well ? He was an infinitely better route runner than either Moss or TO. Was significantly better than Carter at deep routes , and had a highlight reel of big catches in huge games. He certainly made a long lasting impact as the trend to XLarge WRs and the techniques used by them was a heavy Irvin influence. Theres no reality where TO gets on a list above Irvin unless you are relying on a calculator or profootballoutsiders app.
That said much as I do think Irvin is an easy top10. Probably top 7 ...top 4 seems
really high to me. Alworth and Berry not being there is just wtf to me. I personally had them as 4-5. But frankly whoevers #4 on any of your lists...is like half a lace better than someone at #11 or 12 anyways so meh.
Severely underrated player, probably because he plays for the most obscure franchise in the sport. Playing for the Cardinals is like playing for the Titans or Bills, nobody is paying attention. Hurts even more to be buried in that shit time zone, playing late games against the Rams or Seahawks head to head with the back end of network double header national games.
Fitzgerald & Steven Jackson are the two most underrated players of the last decade, because outside of Arizona's brief run with Warner (and even then), nobody watched either guy play. And they were both legit great.
I get the distinct feeling both will be forgotten. I still think the Cowboys get to the SB had they drafted Jackson and not that bum Felix Jones.