Could LSU lose to Alabama in the National Championship and still be #1?

[ZoneBlitz]

You have a point? What?

Yeah, if you werent an idiot that jumped in all late debating what a "round" is you would have known it by now.

 

[Youk]

Yeah, if you werent an idiot that jumped in all late debating what a "round" is you would have known it by now.

Sorry that you have invalid arguments and you decided to argue what a round was. I guess you completely looked over my well thought out and nicely typed post. I'll stoop to your brain capacity next time.

 

[ZoneBlitz]

Sorry that you have invalid arguments and you decided to argue what a round was.

Just because you dont know what my argument is doesnt make it invalid. I didnt decide to argue it, you did. Ok its not a round, i dont care, has zero relevance to my point (which you dont even know).

 

[Youk]

Just because you dont know what my argument is doesnt make it invalid. I didnt decide to argue it, you did. Ok its not a round, i dont care, has zero relevance to my point (which you dont even know).

I decided to skip the garbage posts of yours and figured I would actually give this thread a decent post with my own argument. You still seem to be completely ignoring that one. Can you comprehend it?

:smug:

 

[ZoneBlitz]

I decided to skip the garbage posts of yours and figured I would actually give this thread a decent post with my own argument. You still seem to be completely ignoring that one. Can you comprehend it?

Can you read? I already conceded its not a round, not necessarily because i agree, but mostly because i dont give the slightest shit, and it has absolutely zero relevance to the discussion. Now STFU and GTFO.

 

[Senser81]

1 vs 2 is a round.

So why don't they call it the Bowl Championship Tournament then?

I am amazed at what you lend credence to in this discussion, while at the same time you ignore all logic.

You can't have a playoff because the AP people might release a poll after the playoff is over, thus rendering the playoff meaningless. You can't have a playoff because the BCS people (mysterious group) would "pick the teams" for all the playoff games, thus rendering the playoff meaningless. You can't have a playoff because Dr. Saturday said in his Yahoo sports blog that the NCAA would probably use the BCS ranking system to determine the playoff teams, which is the equivalent to allowing the BCS people (mysterious group) to pick the champion.

None of your points/arguments make sense. No one cares if the AP people decide to release a poll...AND NO ONE CAN STOP THEM. The BCS people (mysterious group) can't "pick the teams" if you have a tournament set up. The only tournament in which the BCS people can "pick the teams" is your hypothetical one-game tournament that pits #1 vs. #2. No one cares what Dr. Saturday thinks.

Pretty awesome...according to Zoneblitz, the main obstruction to getting a playoff in college football is Dr. Saturday's blog article.

 

[Youk]

I'll make it simple for you.

teams get money they like much. no money with playoff. teams no like no money. teams no like playoff.

Dumbed down a bit for you.

 

[Youk]

Can you read? I already conceded its not a round, not necessarily because i agree, but mostly because i dont give the slightest shit, and it has absolutely zero relevance to the discussion. Now STFU and GTFO.

:michaelscott:

Wait, you think my point was about the definition of a round?

LOL I'm not arguing over the rounds anymore you idiot.

 

[ZoneBlitz]

So why don't they call it the Bowl Championship Tournament then?

I am amazed at what you lend credence to in this discussion, while at the same time you ignore all logic.

You can't have a playoff because the AP people might release a poll after the playoff is over, thus rendering the playoff meaningless. You can't have a playoff because the BCS people (mysterious group) would "pick the teams" for all the playoff games, thus rendering the playoff meaningless. You can't have a playoff because Dr. Saturday said in his Yahoo sports blog that the NCAA would probably use the BCS ranking system to determine the playoff teams, which is the equivalent to allowing the BCS people (mysterious group) to pick the champion.

None of your points/arguments make sense. No one cares if the AP people decide to release a poll...AND NO ONE CAN STOP THEM. The BCS people (mysterious group) can't "pick the teams" if you have a tournament set up. The only tournament in which the BCS people can "pick the teams" is your hypothetical one-game tournament that pits #1 vs. #2. No one cares what Dr. Saturday thinks.

Pretty awesome...according to Zoneblitz, the main obstruction to getting a playoff in college football is Dr. Saturday's blog article.

You still have zero idea what my point is.

 

[Youk]

Your posts are already retarded enough, you didnt need to take it to another level.

So you still don't understand?

Amazes me that you seem to no longer want to discuss the topic, yet want to go off-topic.

Seems that's not allowed in the Sports forum. Now get back on topic. :smug:

 

[Senser81]

You still have zero idea what my point is.

Yes, I still have zero idea what your point is. None of the things that you mention have any connection between them. I don't even know if you are arguing against a playoff, or against the practicality of a playoff. You appear to be arguing that a playoff system wouldn't be any more meaningful/conclusive than the current Bowl Championship Series setup...but every time we start discussing that specific topic, you go off on another blithering tangent, stating "the letters B, C, and S will not be eliminated from the English alphabet...even with a playoff".

 

[ZoneBlitz]

Yes, I still have zero idea what your point is. None of the things that you mention have any connection between them. I don't even know if you are arguing against a playoff, or against the practicality of a playoff. You appear to be arguing that a playoff system wouldn't be any more meaningful/conclusive than the current Bowl Championship Series setup...but every time we start discussing that specific topic, you go off on another blithering tangent, stating "the letters B, C, and S will not be eliminated from the English alphabet...even with a playoff".

1) Im not arguing against a playoff.

2) My point is the BCS championship game should be treated like a championship game. The winner should be the champion. We shouldnt have a split title, is my point.

If Bama wins, they should be champions, LSU shouldnt be co-champs.

 

[Senser81]

1) Im not arguing against a playoff.

2) My point is the BCS championship game should be treated like a championship game. The winner should be the champion. We shouldnt have a split title, is my point.

If Bama wins, they should be champions, LSU shouldnt be co-champs.

1) Good

2) It is the championship game. But you can't control what those crazy AP pollsters do. I thought I told you that 10 times now. If it were the championship game, then why isn't it sanctioned by the NCAA?

 

[Youk]

My point is the BCS championship game should be treated like a championship game. The winner should be the champion. We shouldnt have a split title, is my point.

I agree that the NCAA needs to have a clear cut champion. The problem right now is that you have a team that is #2 in most of the computer rankings, but #3 in the BCS that will not get a chance at playing for a championship. If the NCAA wants to have "clear cut" champions, then you need to start with "clear cut" rankings.

 

[ZoneBlitz]

I agree that the NCAA needs to have a clear cut champion. The problem right now is that you have a team that is #2 in most of the computer rankings, but #3 in the BCS that will not get a chance at playing for a championship. If the NCAA wants to have "clear cut" champions, then you need to start with "clear cut" rankings.

I agree with that completely, im the biggest proponent of a playoff. I just dont think the loser of the championship game should get a split of the title.

 

[ZoneBlitz]

1) Good

2) It is the championship game. But you can't control what those crazy AP pollsters do. I thought I told you that 10 times now.

I never disagreed with you, but part of my point is that the AP voters should vote for the winner/champion, like they do in CBB which was your example.

 

[Youk]

I agree with that completely, im the biggest proponent of a playoff. I just dont think the loser of the championship game should get a split of the title.

Agreed. If ANYONE gets a share of the title, it should be Oklahoma State sharing with Alabama. If you lose in the BCS, you shouldn't be eligible for a championship, but I think (and hope) that people have that common sense.

 

[Senser81]

I never disagreed with you, but part of my point is that the AP voters should vote for the winner/champion, like they do in CBB which was your example.

What was the other part of your point?

 

[ZoneBlitz]

What was the other part of your point?

lol that was mostly it. AP shouldnt vote for the loser of the championship game.

Like youk said, if anyone should get a split its Okie State.

 

[Senser81]

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r75KU9reHAs"]Congrats to Goose! Gossage Tirade (NSFW Bad Language!) - YouTube[/ame]