A no-brainer? Are you serious bro? There's been some pretty good back and forth discussion about whether this trade is a good idea or not for the Cavs/Warriors. Obviously, some thought has to be put in.
Anyway, this trade looks damn good on paper. Jackson averaged what, 20PPG last year? Still, I don't think it would work out too well.
Firstly, as many of you said before, Ilguaskas has some serious history with the Cavs and management has some loyal ties with him. It would be unfair to break those bonds and chuck him out the door like yesterday's news.
Secondly, Stephen Jackson really wouldn't help out the Cavs that much. Sure, the guy can spot up and shoot; but he hasn't been doing that the past 2 seasons. The guy is very close to being a ballhog, that consistenly looks for his own shot. Also, the Cavs already have West, Parker, and Green at the 2. Stephen Jackson would make that 4 guys at one position, you simply can't do that, look at the 05-06 Knicks (point guards). The only option would be for the Cavs to deal one of their shooting guards... but then again, that really isn't an option: West, despite his emotional issues, has some serious chemistry with a lot of the guys on the team (LeBron, Mo, etc). The team mentality would take a hit if he was dealt. Parker brings a veteran presence and is an unselfish shooter who can heat up if he's left unguarded. Danny Green is a rookie, the Cavs need to keep him as he will make up part of their young talent base for the future.
There are only 2 ways I see this deal going down: The first is if Ferry just decides to bet it all and makes a big risk-reward move. The second is if the Cavs really sell themselves on the idea that LeBron isn't coming back in 2010-2011. Then maybe (and this is a stretch) they could use Stephen Jackson as their sub-par replacement go-to-guy/franchise player.
I am a Cavs fan btw and I say it's in their best interest to not make this move.