LSU-Alabama rematch for SEC title?

[FirstTimer]

Your idea is losing.

 

[Bomberooski]

After all the arguements you made yesterday ZB I will stick to my guns on the fact that ONE meeting between Alabama and LSU is better. It makes that game more awesome. Rematch would water BOTH the first and second matchup down.

 

[SethMode]

If you're going to have 1 more game, you might as well have 2 more and at least make it a fair, best 2 out of 3 deal (which is also not a good idea).

 

[Senser81]

LSU-Georgia

 

[killgod]

53 > 47

:troll:

 

[FirstTimer]

Interesting link:

http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/sp...-a-lsu-alabama-rematch-in-bcs-title-game.html

47% of these voters want a rematch.

Interesting link:

http://www.virtualsportsdaily.com/forum/showthread.php?p=1900083#post1900083

9 of 12(75%) respondents to the issue don't want to see a rematch.

 

[Senser81]

I underestimated how many people hate college football rematches. Im of the NFL mindset that rematches arent bad at all. Having said that ive heard alot of chatter wanting an LSU-Alabama rematch for the national title game. Clearly that opinion is not prevalent here.

Did you watch the Nebraska-Washington bowl game last year?

 

[FirstTimer]

I should just join that site with the 47% who agree with me. Hopefully, there would be no fag troll mods like FT there.

 

[Senser81]

I dont see it as "Alabama had their chance so now Georgia deserves one". If Georgia was so worthy of a chance they wouldnt have lost to Boise & South Carolina. Georgia had chances, too.

So did Alabama. And Georgia deserves a chance regardless of Alabama, because Georgia will win their division, and Alabama won't.

 

[ZoneBlitz]

So did Alabama. And Georgia deserves a chance regardless of Alabama, because Georgia will win their division, and Alabama won't.

"Deserves" is a relative term. I dont see winning the SEC East as a major accomplishment.

 

[FirstTimer]

"Deserves" is a relative term. I dont see winning the SEC East as a major accomplishment.

But not winning the SEC West is?

Love it.

Georgia doesn't deserve to play LSU...even though we haven't see the on the field results yet.

Seems an awful lot like an argument a BCS supporter would make when disregarding mid majors.

Hmmm....

 

[ZoneBlitz]

But not winning the SEC West is?

Having a much higher ranking is a more impressive accomplishment.

 

[FirstTimer]

Having a much higher ranking is a more impressive accomplishment.

Well thank God that's objective!

 

[Bomberooski]

Having a much higher ranking is a more impressive accomplishment.

yeah, and LSU has a higher ranking than Alabama and that's going to help LSU play in the SEC Championship

 

[Senser81]

"Deserves" is a relative term. I dont see winning the SEC East as a major accomplishment.

Thats irrelevant. It doesn't matter if its a major accomplishment or a minor accomplishment. The accomplishment is deserving of an SEC title shot. Fin.

 

[ZoneBlitz]

Thats irrelevant. It doesn't matter if its a major accomplishment or a minor accomplishment. The accomplishment is deserving of an SEC title shot. Fin.

"Deserving" is an opinion. Theres a difference between Georgia deserving to be in (totally subjective based on the person), and Georgia being in because they won their division and thats the way its set up. Im saying i would like it to be set up differently. Its just a suggestion. Even if no one agrees with it, id just like to state its simply a suggestion, nothing more.

 

[FirstTimer]

"Deserving" is an opinion. Theres a difference between Georgia deserving to be in (totally subjective based on the person), and Georgia being in because they won their division and thats the way its set up. Im saying i would like it to be set up differently. Its just a suggestion. Even if no one agrees with it, id just like to state its simply a suggestion, nothing more.

Thank God the rankings idea you are standing behind used isn't subjective.

Makes perfect sense.

:lolwut:

How can you take yourself seriously when saying that Georgia being "deserving" is "subjective" and an "opinion" but then advocate using polling as a more impressive way of putting Alabam back in the SEC Title game?

:jonesy:

 

[ZoneBlitz]

I never, ever, ever said my suggestion wasnt subjective. Of course it is.

 

[FirstTimer]

I never, ever, ever said my suggestion wasnt subjective. Of course it is.

bama:

Then why even point out that saying Georgia is "deserving" is subjective?

That's irrelevant to the entire discussion then.

 

[FirstTimer]

Your "suggestion" gets worse by the post.