Mel Kiper Is A Cocksucker

[Deviant]

Watching Sportscenter this morning and this douchecunt came on and released his rookie QB grades.

He gave Bradford a C (I think?). He said that Bradford's line didn't give him time to throw and he got pressured, but when he had time to throw, he made good passes. Said Feeley didn't look any better, so Bradford might be pushed to the starting position early.

Fair analysis. Next is Tebow.

He gave Tebow a B for his performance. But then, he says, well, let's not lose perspective here. He was playing against guys who will never play in the NFL. His motion still isn't quick and it was evident in the pocket.

Didn't even bother to talk about the positives of his performance, but that's fine. It's true, most of those guys won't play in the NFL. Next was Clausen.

He gave Clausen a B+. Really strange considering statistically Tebow was better and Tebow didn't throw a pick. But, he says Clausen looked really good out there. He was making great throws and looked composed.

Fair analysis. I thought Clausen did look good out there. But, uh, why does Clausen get such a positive review and Tebow gets shit when they both performed well when they were called to the field.

Last but not least, he give McCoy a D. Absolutely deserved. He bombed. But, Kiper says it was just a bad outing. He'll have time.

What the fuck? So, when Tebow does well, we have to keep in mind that he's playing against nobodies, but when McCoy plays them, he has time? Now, I'm not a huge fan of Tebow. I'd like to see him succeed, definitely. But why is Mel Kiper such a dick towards Tebow that he can't even just praise the guy for having the best night out of the four?

ESPN should fire him. He sucks. He predicts the 2001 Patriots would go 0-16, was highly critical of soon to be hall of famer Marshall Faulk, called Mike Williams a Hall-of-Famer, and let's not forget this shining moment:

<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZubYpplmzVk&rel=0&border=1&color1=0x2b405b&color2=0x6b8ab6&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZubYpplmzVk&rel=0&border=1&color1=0x2b405b&color2=0x6b8ab6&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>

 

[EmpireWF]

He can't be perfect.

 

[FirstTimer]

Mel Kiper>>>>You when it comes to player evaluation.

 

[killgod]

He can't be perfect and he's a better talent analysis than anyone here


BUT

That cracka said Dumbarcus is the next John Elway. Any idiot can see that he's black.

 

[MRN]

Black quarterback...stereotype turned out correct.

 

[theMINI]

What's the matter? He said in 2-3 years Russell can be a top 5 elite quarterback and he was right. He certainly had the talent and the skills to become a top 5 elite quarterback, he just didn't pan out because he was lazy or whatever.

 

[steeljake]

Watching Sportscenter this morning and this douchecunt came on and released his rookie QB grades.

He gave Bradford a C (I think?). He said that Bradford's line didn't give him time to throw and he got pressured, but when he had time to throw, he made good passes. Said Feeley didn't look any better, so Bradford might be pushed to the starting position early.

Fair analysis. Next is Tebow.

He gave Tebow a B for his performance. But then, he says, well, let's not lose perspective here. He was playing against guys who will never play in the NFL. His motion still isn't quick and it was evident in the pocket.

Didn't even bother to talk about the positives of his performance, but that's fine. It's true, most of those guys won't play in the NFL. Next was Clausen.

He gave Clausen a B+. Really strange considering statistically Tebow was better and Tebow didn't throw a pick. But, he says Clausen looked really good out there. He was making great throws and looked composed.

Fair analysis. I thought Clausen did look good out there. But, uh, why does Clausen get such a positive review and Tebow gets shit when they both performed well when they were called to the field.

Last but not least, he give McCoy a D. Absolutely deserved. He bombed. But, Kiper says it was just a bad outing. He'll have time.

What the fuck? So, when Tebow does well, we have to keep in mind that he's playing against nobodies, but when McCoy plays them, he has time? Now, I'm not a huge fan of Tebow. I'd like to see him succeed, definitely. But why is Mel Kiper such a dick towards Tebow that he can't even just praise the guy for having the best night out of the four?

ESPN should fire him. He sucks. He predicts the 2001 Patriots would go 0-16, was highly critical of soon to be hall of famer Marshall Faulk, called Mike Williams a Hall-of-Famer, and let's not forget this shining moment:

<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZubYpplmzVk&rel=0&border=1&color1=0x2b405b&color2=0x6b8ab6&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZubYpplmzVk&rel=0&border=1&color1=0x2b405b&color2=0x6b8ab6&hl=en_US&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>

I wanted to read your post and understand it, but it just sounded like you were mumbling around tebow's cock in your mouth...

 

[Blade]

What's the matter? He said in 2-3 years Russell can be a top 5 elite quarterback and he was right. He certainly had the talent and the skills to become a top 5 elite quarterback, he just didn't pan out because he was lazy or whatever.

For once I am in Kiper's corner. Jamarcus was just a fat lazy kid, who was high on codeine all the time turns out, I don't think even Kiper could have seen that coming.

Also, wasn't Clausen playing against the some first teamers and 2nd teamers? I didn't see the Browns game, but Tebow was playing against the last guys on the depth chart of a Training camp roster, he's got a point.

 

[ralaw]

Denver fans are becoming with Tebow what Dallas fans are with Romo.

 

[Senser81]

For once I am in Kiper's corner. Jamarcus was just a fat lazy kid, who was high on codeine all the time turns out, I don't think even Kiper could have seen that coming.

I disagree. Russell didn't play that much his freshman year, was ok his sophomore year, and was really good his junior year. Regardless of character/laziness issues, I was not in his corner simply because he was still unproven IMO. He wasn't a great college QB, he wasn't really the leader of his team, and it seemed like people just assumed he would have been awesome in his senior year had he stayed at LSU. I think a lot of people were premature in their judgment of Russell.

On a side note, WTF is Kiper even doing grading/regrading rookie QBs after one preseason game? If Colt McCoy went 14/14 for 250 yards and 4 TDs against a 3rd string defense, would Kiper say "McCoy is the next John Unitas?"

 

[kmanharris]

Denver fans are becoming with Tebow what Dallas fans are with Romo.

At least we waited until Romo started a game in the regular season before we began sucking him off.

Don't you compare us to the likes of GoblinSlayer!

 

[Deviant]

I wanted to read your post and understand it, but it just sounded like you were mumbling around tebow's cock in your mouth...

I couldn't care less if Tebow became a hall-of-famer or didn't make it out of preseason. I think people should be treated fairly in evaluation and shouldn't be downplayed because it's fun to make downplay the obvious target.

For once I am in Kiper's corner. Jamarcus was just a fat lazy kid, who was high on codeine all the time turns out, I don't think even Kiper could have seen that coming.

Also, wasn't Clausen playing against the some first teamers and 2nd teamers? I didn't see the Browns game, but Tebow was playing against the last guys on the depth chart of a Training camp roster, he's got a point.

That's why I said his points on Clausen were fair. I thought Clausen looked good out there since he came out in the Second Quarter and was going against mainly the second team. But, still, Tebow should be given a little more credit than Kiper gave him. McCoy was playing in the late 3rd Quarter and looked horrible. Limp noodle throws, no power behind them... Kiper never mentioned that though. But he was jumping all over Tebow and his throwing motion. He's so clearly biased against the guy for no reason other than that "he just shouldn't be a quarterback".

Denver fans are becoming with Tebow what Dallas fans are with Romo.

I'm a Giants fan. I'm don't care for Tebow, but it's stupid that he gets this bias. He'll be the 2nd/3rd string QB for Denver because Orton's clearly the starter right now, but Tebow certainly deserves some praise. He's definitely showed that he at the least has the ability.

 

[Deviant]

On a side note, WTF is Kiper even doing grading/regrading rookie QBs after one preseason game? If Colt McCoy went 14/14 for 250 yards and 4 TDs against a 3rd string defense, would Kiper say "McCoy is the next John Unitas?"

Exactly. It made no sense for him to even open his mouth when they've only played one game, nonetheless in the pre-season.

 

[Chadman]

I disagree. Russell didn't play that much his freshman year, was ok his sophomore year, and was really good his junior year. Regardless of character/laziness issues, I was not in his corner simply because he was still unproven IMO. He wasn't a great college QB, he wasn't really the leader of his team, and it seemed like people just assumed he would have been awesome in his senior year had he stayed at LSU. I think a lot of people were premature in their judgment of Russell.

On a side note, WTF is Kiper even doing grading/regrading rookie QBs after one preseason game? If Colt McCoy went 14/14 for 250 yards and 4 TDs against a 3rd string defense, would Kiper say "McCoy is the next John Unitas?"

I love you. Russell didnt do shit at lsu. That wasnt even his team when he was there. It was the defenses team + whatever running back they had. Russell went number 1 because of his upside, potential, what he was predicted to pan out into. However, he failed when he stepped foot in oakland. Who the hell is gonna get an oppurtunity to show potential in that hell hole? Brady quinn wasnt so hot coming out of college either. I ignored the talks of him not being able to win a good game and payed attention to the throws he made. He spent 75% of his time in a vertical offense chucking it deep to tall wideouts in samardjiza who was the second best wideout in college imo at the time, stovall, and the mcknight. When he wasnt chucking it deep, he was throwing inaccurate just about everywhere else. The only reason i had brady quinn over j roc was because i j roc was shit. before the offseason, i didnt even know who the fuck j roc was.


With the whole kiper thing, i agree. Tebow didnt look that impressive as a qb imo. Clausen had the best performance as he actually made throws downfield, and some sort of timing in the passing game. Tebows best throw all night, and only "legit" throw where he was going downfield was the pass that was dropped.

 

[ralaw]

I'm a Giants fan. I'm don't care for Tebow, but it's stupid that he gets this bias. He'll be the 2nd/3rd string QB for Denver because Orton's clearly the starter right now, but Tebow certainly deserves some praise. He's definitely showed that he at the least has the ability.

He did give him a B though....not really sure what that means or if it even matters though. I don't think anyone has ever denied Tebow would be the 2nd/3rd string QB this year, so I really don't get your complaint.

 

[Tailback U]

So let me get this straight.

He gave Clausen a B+ because he looked pretty good out there, better than all the other rookie QBs thus far. Which you agreed to.

He gave Tebow a B because he looked decent but played against terrible competition, which you again agreed to.

He gave McCoy a D for bombing, again which you agreed to.

So what the fuck are you crying about?

 

[Deviant]

He did give him a B though....not really sure what that means or if it even matters though. I don't think anyone has ever denied Tebow would be the 2nd/3rd string QB this year, so I really don't get your complaint.

He gave him a B because anything lower would have made him look like a complete hater. He graded Tebow like the teacher that really doesn't like you or wants to see you fail, but because you clearly have done well, he just left his hatred in the comments. If Tebow had bombed, he would have said, "I said it all along, Tebow can't not play at this level" which is strange considering that he gave pity to McCoy would absolutely bombed.

 

[ralaw]

He gave him a B because anything lower would have made him look like a complete hater. He graded Tebow like the teacher that really doesn't like you or wants to see you fail, but because you clearly have done well, he just left his hatred in the comments. If Tebow had bombed, he would have said, "I said it all along, Tebow can't not play at this level" which is strange considering that he gave pity to McCoy would absolutely bombed.

Are you sure you're not a Denver fan?

 

[KNUBB]

I don't even know why Russell's name is even being brought up, but to say he wasn't an impressive college QB is retarded. He threw for over 3000 yards and completed 68% of his passes with a 28-8 Td/Int ratio. I don't know about you but that is a hell of a season.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Champ]

Tapatalk works now?