I haven't followed this series, but how much blame gets put on Dusty Baker for this collapse? I've never really thought of him as a good manager, yet he's always winning awards. But this type of postseason collapse seems to be par for the course for Baker.
Like usual, there are some observers who are following the same old knee jerk 'blame Dusty' narrative.
A failed hit & run cost the Reds big, but way too much is being made of that by writers who don't know the team. There is only one player on the team who Dusty uses the hit & run with, Ryan Hanigan, and that's who was batting in this situation. He has the best contact rate on the team, and one of the best contact rates in all of baseball. He took a 3-2 pitch that was a foot outside, got rung up, and Jay Bruce was hung out to dry at 3B (and Sandoval may have missed the tag). So no outs, bases loaded turned into two outs, man on second.
Dusty left Leake in for too long game 4, and left Latos in too long game 5.
Other than that, he managed a good series. Used his bullpen very well. Despite having zero save situations, he used Chapman nearly every game. He used Sean Marshall for multiple innings instead of inferior relievers. He handled the Cueto situation Game 1 perfectly, using Lecure first and allowing Latos proper time to get warm.
Johnny Cueto facing one batter the entire series cost the Reds way more than Dusty did. Sure, the Reds won Game 1 anyway, but it threw off the entire rotation, forced Mike Leake to start a game, and not having Cueto for the critical Game 5 at home was huge.
But it's Dusty, so people are looking for ways to blame him.