The Sporting News' 10 Greatest NFL Teams Ever

[KINGOFOOTBALL]

As always Im assuming this is all on one year accomplishment not talent level and likelyhood of winning head to head.

2007 Patriots and 2001 Rams would beat most of these teams in a best of three. Pats would sweep almost all of them.

I hope this is schtick.

Rams had enough speed and so much offensive depth to stand a chance and likely beat 3-4 of these. But LOL at 07 pats against most of these teams.

Im assuming this takes place with todays pathetic rule set for you to fathom this.

94 niners ,83 skins beat both 01 Rams and 07 Pats.

The '89 niners not making this list is shameful. They should be hovering in the 8 to 7 range IMO. Maybe higher. The '92 Boys are lucky Montana was injured that year, or else their playoff meeting would have turned out different.

What on earth did Montana have to do with the Niners after Leonard Marshall one man gang raped him in 90 ?

If you teleport Deion onto the 92 team noone else on the list is even close what good does that do us ?

((p.s 93 fwiw Cowboys were a better and more talented team))

Just think if Asante Samuel could catch .. the 07' Pats would be the #1 team on this list.. instead, not even on the top 10 (which I disagree strongly with btw).

The least talented , least depth , and one of the slowest defenses in comparison to these.

LOL at thinking Wes Welker and Randy Moss last 2 quarters without cracking in half or dying against a team like 78 steelers or 85 Bears.
They averaged 10ypc with 1 td with modern rules against an atrocious secondary , decent LBers , and a top grade Dline. Theyd be toast against teams who had elite play coming from all 3 units and smarter coordinators.


Your best weapon cant be "Bill Bellycheck" when the other side has guys like Knoll , Shula , Madden , Landry , Lombardi , and THE greatest defensive/Offensive minds ever in Buddy Ryan and Bill Walsh.




When the singularity hits and computers can map and reconstruct humans they will clone all teams in there prime year , give them equal training and nutrition , play by a random 70s-90s rule book and the top 4 will be.

85 Bears , 78 Steelers , 93 Cowboys ,84 Niners.

 

[FirstTimer]

The '89 niners not making this list is shameful. They should be hovering in the 8 to 7 range IMO. Maybe higher. The '92 Boys are lucky Montana was injured that year, or else their playoff meeting would have turned out different.

Uhhh..that Niners team was 14-2 Steve Young was really fucking good anyways.

Why would Montana have mattered?

 

[Saluki]

Uhhh..that Niners team was 14-2 Steve Young was really fucking good anyways.

Why would Montana have mattered?

Teams get spoiled with all these HOF Quarterbacks. 1x pro-bowler jim mcmahon FTW

 

[KINGOFOOTBALL]

Teams get spoiled with all these HOF Quarterbacks. 1x pro-bowler jim mcmahon FTW

While they may have the most questionable QB.....they have arguably the best RB in the crop.
Any team facing Bears/Cowboys is going to have to worry about stopping the two most prolific and determined runners of all time. Both of them have top grade defenses preventing shoot it out leads from keeping them out of the game.
Not a problem you face with the other teams.

 

[Senser81]

Any team facing Bears/Cowboys is going to have to worry about stopping the two most prolific and determined runners of all time. Both of them have top grade defenses preventing shoot it out leads from keeping them out of the game.
Not a problem you face with the other teams.

The 95 Steelers seemed to have little problem stopping a prolific Emmitt Smith (18 carries, 49 yards), while the cocaine-addled 85 Patriots had no trouble containing a determined Walter Payton (22 carries, 61 yards, 1 fumble).

 

[FirstTimer]

The 95 Steelers seemed to have little problem stopping a prolific Emmitt Smith (18 carries, 49 yards), while the cocaine-addled 85 Patriots had no trouble containing a determined Walter Payton (22 carries, 61 yards, 1 fumble).

Then again the 85 Patriots sold out completely on stopping Walter and let Matt Suhey and Jim McMahon/Willie Gault get off.

The Patriots sole purpose was to stop Walter...and they ended up giving up 37 points.

 

[Senser81]

Then again the 85 Patriots sold out completely on stopping Walter and let Matt Suhey and Jim McMahon/Willie Gault get off.

The Patriots sole purpose was to stop Walter...and they ended up giving up 37 points.

I didn't say the 85 Patriots were good.

 

[FirstTimer]

I didn't say the 85 Patriots were good.

Fully aware.

Just wanted to point out that while the Patriots shut down Payton they paid a large price to do so. As such, pointing out that Payton could be contained and giving an example of a game Payton's team won by 36 points, in part because New England's sell out tactic against Payton allowed other players to shine, didn't make much sense to me.

 

[Senser81]

Fully aware.

Just wanted to point out that while the Patriots shut down Payton they paid a large price to do so. As such, pointing out that Payton could be contained and giving an example of a game Payton's team won by 36 points, in part because New England's sell out tactic against Payton allowed other players to shine, didn't make much sense to me.

I could point out other times that Payton was shut down in the Super Bowl, but the Bears failed to play in another one.

In 9 postseason games, Payton went over 100 yards only once, and that was his 104-yard game against the Redskins in 1984. He also had a few putrid games, like his 18 carry-32 yard 1985 NFC championship against the Rams and his 14 carry-38 yard game against the Skins in 1986.

Payton was great. Payton was consistent. But Payton wasn't anymore "unstoppable" than lesser RBs on the list like Larry Csonka and Franco Harris.

 

[FirstTimer]

I could point out other times that Payton was shut down in the Super Bowl, but the Bears failed to play in another one.

In 9 postseason games, Payton went over 100 yards only once, and that was his 104-yard game against the Redskins in 1984. He also had a few putrid games, like his 18 carry-32 yard 1985 NFC championship against the Rams and his 14 carry-38 yard game against the Skins in 1986.

Payton was great. Payton was consistent. But Payton wasn't anymore "unstoppable" than lesser RBs on the list like Larry Csonka and Franco Harris.

Whatever. I played with him in TECMO.

I know what's up.

 

[Senser81]

Whatever. I played with him in TECMO.

I know what's up.

If thats the case, then I say the 1988 LA Raiders are the best team of all-time.

 

[Rayman]

The 95 Steelers seemed to have little problem stopping a prolific Emmitt Smith (18 carries, 49 yards), while the cocaine-addled 85 Patriots had no trouble containing a determined Walter Payton (22 carries, 61 yards, 1 fumble).

And still lost.

:smug:

((p.s 93 fwiw Cowboys were a better and more talented team))

Never quite got why people say the 92 team was so great and leave out the 93 team. They humiliated the 49ers in the NFCCG (The real Super Bowl at the time) and put zero effort into the first half against Buffalo and still ended up rolling them in XXVIII.

Same exact group of guys, just happened to actually win home field in the NFC that year.

 

[jms493]

86 Giants...........runs out of here

 

[Bear Pand]

You can groan all you want Aso, but you can't be a top 10 NFL team of all time without the ring.

So you're telling me that if you had two of the best teams of all time playing during the same season...the team that eventually missed/lost the SB wouldn't be in the top 10?

Not saying any team meets this criteria. But it should still be possible to be a top 10 team w/o winning a ring.

 

[KINGOFOOTBALL]

95 Steelers had as much talent as most teams on the list. Dick Lebeau ,2 hof caliber players and at least 5 pb caliber guys on opening day.
Against a 95 team without Turner at oc , without Harper/Stepnoski/Gogan and a post injury Erik Williams. They still played 8 in the box.

Ft already addressed 85.

There is a significant gap between bears/cowboys running backs and the rest.

 

[Rayman]

95 Steelers had as much talent as most teams on the list. Dick Lebeau ,2 hof caliber players and at least 5 pb caliber guys on opening day.
Against a 95 team without Turner at oc , without Harper/Stepnoski/Gogan and a post injury Erik Williams. They still played 8 in the box.

Ft already addressed 85.

There is a significant gap between bears/cowboys running backs and the rest.

Defensively, at least.

 

[KINGOFOOTBALL]

Defensively, at least.

Yes on defense. But Neil yancey and bam were the next triplets.

 

[Rayman]

Yes on defense. But Neil yancey and bam were the next triplets.

Andre Hastings the Touchdown Maker.


:shifty:

 

[Hasselbeck]

You can groan all you want Aso, but you can't be a top 10 NFL team of all time without the ring.

Their only loss was in the Super Bowl.. and even then it took a dropped pick and a miracle catch to help knock them out.

I see your point, but I would still take the 07' Pats against most of the teams in this top 10 list. For most of that season you'd be lucky to stay within 3 touchdowns of them.

The 85 Bears vs. the 07' Pats would be one fun matchup to dream up though.

 

[G-men]

Their only loss was in the Super Bowl.. and even then it took a dropped pick and a miracle catch to help knock them out.

I see your point, but I would still take the 07' Pats against most of the teams in this top 10 list. For most of that season you'd be lucky to stay within 3 touchdowns of them.

The 85 Bears vs. the 07' Pats would be one fun matchup to dream up though.

And just imagine if those Pats had any sort of running game.

The 2007 Pats IMO should be ranked here. Them losing one game, albeit the Super Bowl, doesn't make them any worse of a team talent-wise.