wtf 22 sacks as a sophmore and as a mobile qb
21 sacks his freshman year. 56.6 completion percentage? 18 tds...11 ints? No more than 300 passing yards in a single game? 7.10 yards per throw?
1st game-Purdue(7gms): 89/159 (56.0%), 1169 yards, 10 TD, 8 INT; Rushing: 86 attempts, 367 yards (4.3 YPC), 4 TD's
Post-Purdue(6gms): 78/136 (57.4%), 925 yards, 8 TD's, 3 INT; Rushing: 76 attempts, 412 yards (5.4 YPC), 3 TD's
Pryor definately improved as the season went on, culminating in his Rose Bowl performance against Oregon.
44.4 completion percentage vs usc
38.5 vs wisconsin
No doubt, USC game he was a disaster.
Wisconsin was kind of meh, we started off the 2nd half with a pick-6 and KR for a TD and the offense was bascially shut down after that since that gave us a sizeable lead. He didn't really play well, but he didn't really have to at that point.
Pryor actually had 2 bubble screens that were counted as runs... not that it really makes much of a difference only bringing it up to 52%.
Yuck. He still cant pass. If he knows whats best for him..he better stay untill he is a senior if he wants to have a legit shot in the NFL. If not...hes the next black scrambling qb to not do shit...as an actual QB.
Unless he develops into the second coming of Peyton Manning next year he'll be a four year player.
if you think that sounds bad..try watching him pass the ball from the pocket and in game. he has no since of timing in the passing game, accuracy, and for being touted for having a big arm..rarely do you see that big arm in action.
Did you even watch the Rose Bowl? Pryor was a completely different QB, that was painfully obvious for all to see, against a defense ranked in the top 25 in the nation in passing efficiency. He was reading defenses much better, hitting Saine up the sideline against a Cover 2, throwing a dart to Posey right as he made his cut on a slant against a cover 2 inside the corner, multiple backshoulder fades to Posey against tight man to man coverage, etc., finding Dane right away against a 0 blitz, I could go on.
The biggest difference with Pryor as the season wore on was a schmatic one from JT and the staff. Early in the year he really didn't have a running game backing him up, and for the most part our "running" game consisted of zone reads with Pryor out of the gun, and then there was the Purdue disaster. After that, JT went to a much more pro-style attack, and gave Pryor that running game he needed (We put up over 200 yards on the ground against such stout defenses as Penn State and Iowa), allowing him to grow as a passer as the defenses couldn't key on him completely. The bowl practices is where he grew the most though... the difference from the USC game to Penn State or Iowa was already significant, but it was night and day from Michigan to the Rose Bowl.
He had a great spring. We return 9 starters on offense (It's basically 10 since Mike Adams started 3-4 games last year). The only player of any significance we lose is Jake Ballard, and Jake Stoneburner is an upgrade in the passing game at TE over him (Although we are losing something in terms of blocking). His top 2 targets are back... we have an stable of talented backs... chances are he's going to have a pretty good year and he'll continue to grow as a passer.
I feel like this year, Pryor will continue his growth and have a good season. He won't put up Heisman numbers, but I'm expecting something along the lines of 60-61% completion, 2500-2700 yards, 23-25 TD's and 5-8 INT.