That's your own opinion. Vick has a career 53.8 passing percentage. A 75.7 career QB rating, and also led his team to a NFC Championship game. The guy wasn't the best passer in the league, but to say he wasn't a good QB is just speaking out of your ass. The guy was an NFL QB and got the job done. Plus 2006 was his best year as a passer, so you could see he was coming into his own. He had a cannon for an arm, not very good accuarcy, but no, he didn't "just run".
I'm not a huge Michael Vick fan, and would I welcome him on the Jaguars? No. But that is because my team is starting to base them selves off of good character guys and at this point don't need a huge media circus in that locker room all summer when they are trying to get back to being a successful ball club. Plus I am a believer in David Garrard and believe if he is given time in the pocket that he can be a good QB in this league.
Now if I am a team who is desperate for QB help and need a spark plug on the offensive side of the ball, then yes I would take a shot at Mike Vick. I personally think he would look good in the Vikings offense. With having such a successful run game like he had in Atlanta, I think Mike would come right in and add another dynamic element to that offense. Plus Mike and Percy Harvin in the Wildcat formation could be one of the most dangerous things in football. When guys like Ray Lewis, Leonard Little and Pacman Jones are all given second chances but say Mike Vick shouldn't have one are just pathetic. I hate people who value animals lives or humans, it has never made sense to me and never will. It's ok to murder another human being, but it's the biggest crime in the world if a man funds dog fights. Please.