Stoudemire won't be traded to the Cavs, but this thread is still very lulzworthy.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • FedEx227
    Delivers
    • Mar 2009
    • 10454

    #46
    Originally posted by BUCK3YE5
    If you people think +/- means anything in the NBA, you are dumber than I thought. Keep in mind, the Cavs bench is basically another starting lineup, so of course they are gonna be + against other teams' benches.
    ......what?
    VoicesofWrestling.com

    Comment

    • BUCK3YE5
      CP 2K12
      • Aug 2009
      • 1410

      #47
      So you are saying Delonte West is a top 5 player in the NBA? Because last year he was in +/-

      Comment

      • DoubleDeuce
        Spellin' n' shit
        • Feb 2009
        • 5873

        #48
        Originally posted by BUCK3YE5
        Your an idiot. Shaq essentially cancels out or does better than every big man he faces. Including Dwight.
        Oh yeah, because Brook Lopez going 23 and 14(8 offensive) is really cancelled out. Shaq went 7 and 8 that game.

        Or David Lee getting 20 and 8 while Shaq got 19 and 1

        Or DeAndre FUCKING Jordan outrebounding Shaq by 5.

        Need I go on?

        Comment

        • FedEx227
          Delivers
          • Mar 2009
          • 10454

          #49
          So you are saying Delonte West is a top 5 player in the NBA? Because last year he was in +/-
          Yes because +/- means you're the best in the league. I never said that.

          I didn't say it's the be-all, end-all. It's extremely dependent on your teammates. That's why I tend to look at the 5-man units one more so than straight +/- for 1 player. It still shows that when Delonte West was in the game, the Cavaliers as a team were pretty good. It doesn't mean Delonte is top 5 in the league (13.5 PER), nobody is saying that... you can't take +/- to be IT.

          You can't ignore it and think it's retarded but you can't rank the NBA players by it.
          VoicesofWrestling.com

          Comment

          • Sportsbuck
            Buckeye For Life
            • Dec 2008
            • 3045

            #50
            Shaq isn't a dominant player anymore obviously, but his prescence on the floor is big for the Cavs in what it means for matchups. Last year we would've got torn up by the Lakers because all we had in terms of big men was Z, now with Shaq we can get them both on the floor at the same time and it lets Z play his game without worrying about guarding Dwight Howard.

            Shaq isn't a dominating defender by any stretch of the imagination and he's not going to cancel out Dwight Howard, but he makes the other matchups on the court much better. Nothing was worse than watching AV try to guard Dwight last year when Z needed a breather. Dude tries hard, but my god.

            Comment

            • Woy
              RIP West
              • Dec 2008
              • 16372

              #51
              Originally posted by BUCK3YE5
              In a couple year he'll be an all-star.


              He said he was leaning towards re-signing


              Your an idiot


              Your an idiot. Shaq essentially cancels out or does better than every big man he faces. Including Dwight.

              If you people think +/- means anything in the NBA, you are dumber than I thought. Keep in mind, the Cavs bench is basically another starting lineup, so of course they are gonna be + against other teams' benches.
              You're*



              ^ Shouts to MvP for the sick sig. GFX TEAM BACK

              .

              Comment

              • FedEx227
                Delivers
                • Mar 2009
                • 10454

                #52
                The Cavs biggest problem last year wasn't Howard though, I think it was the Pietrus/Lewis/Hedo combo. They made it impossible for the Cavs to put a balanced lineup out there. If they went small to guard those guys Howard had his way, but if they went big you had Anderson trying to guard perimeter guys.
                VoicesofWrestling.com

                Comment

                • Juggernaut
                  Sitting on the Sidelines
                  • Dec 2008
                  • 5670

                  #53
                  Originally posted by FedEx227
                  The Cavs biggest problem last year wasn't Howard though, I think it was the Pietrus/Lewis/Hedo combo. They made it impossible for the Cavs to put a balanced lineup out there. If they went small to guard those guys Howard had his way, but if they went big you had Anderson trying to guard perimeter guys.
                  So...they got Amar'e to help...defensively?



                  Amar'e may be a bigger body yet he's a shit defender, maybe he'll decide to play defense with LeBron nagging his ass but otherwise Amar'e just helps LeBron since he'll be able to take some of LeBron's shots away and allow LeBron to focus on defense.

                  Comment

                  • ralaw
                    Posts too much
                    • Feb 2009
                    • 6663

                    #54
                    Amare with Lebron? That is a scary combo....scary. While Amare might not be as explosive and dominant as he once was, he'll still instantly be the best player Lebron has ever had. His ability to play inside and out fits well with this team.
                    If you're the Cavs, you have to take the chance..... Hickson is a good young player, but in the end he's just not a player that you keep to pass on Amare.

                    Comment

                    • DJ Rhude
                      #42 G.O.A.T.
                      • Feb 2009
                      • 4359

                      #55
                      ^^^^ Agreed, and Stoudemire is not exactly over the hill so it's not like they're giving up a young player for an aging one in his twilight years.....they'll beast with Stoudemire for some years (I'm thinking Lebron is staying put)

                      Comment

                      • RainboUnicorn
                        No Homo
                        • Nov 2008
                        • 1873

                        #56
                        I thought the Suns tried the Amare/Shaq thing and it didn't work quite well if I'm not mistaken.

                        Comment

                        • DJ Rhude
                          #42 G.O.A.T.
                          • Feb 2009
                          • 4359

                          #57
                          This would be more like the Lebron/Amare thing though.....Suns also ran a different offensive system than the Cavs do....Shaq will get in where he fits in....Cavs would be crazy not to make this deal

                          Comment

                          • BUCK3YE5
                            CP 2K12
                            • Aug 2009
                            • 1410

                            #58
                            Originally posted by FedEx227
                            The Cavs biggest problem last year wasn't Howard though, I think it was the Pietrus/Lewis/Hedo combo.
                            Somebody didnt watch Game 6 of the ECF...

                            Comment

                            • Argath
                              $2 whore
                              • Apr 2009
                              • 9241

                              #59
                              Originally posted by BUCK3YE5
                              Somebody didnt watch Game 6 of the ECF...
                              somebody didn't watch the entire ECF last year

                              Comment

                              • BUCK3YE5
                                CP 2K12
                                • Aug 2009
                                • 1410

                                #60
                                Originally posted by RainboUnicorn
                                I thought the Suns tried the Amare/Shaq thing and it didn't work quite well if I'm not mistaken.
                                Lets review...Suns do a run n gun offense. Cleveland is mostly a half-court offense. Suns dont play defense...Cleveland is one of (if not THE) best defensive teams in the league. So what they did in Phoenix together has NOTHING to do with what they will do together in Cleveland. (I say will because it seems like this is gonna get done--whether its Phoenix getting Hickson or Philly getting Hickson and Phoenix getting Iggy.

                                Also I dont think Amare will be a liability on defense. Players (like Mo Williams) came to Cleveland to win a ring, so they stepped up their games (especially ondefense) I would be surprised if Amare was a problem defensively.

                                Comment

                                Working...