NBA Rumors Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • KNUBB
    WHITE RONDO
    • Jun 2009
    • 7973

    Originally posted by Juggernaut
    People said the same thing about LeBron/Wade/Bosh all signing on one team. It can be done, just someone would be getting fucked.
    The difference is that they REALLY can't afford it. Amare and Melo can't restructure and CP's contract is due more than they have.


    Comment

    • s@ppisgod
      No longer a noob
      • Apr 2011
      • 1032

      Originally posted by Juggernaut
      Sucks that teams are trying to become "super teams". Honestly, I wouldn't mind CP3 on the Knicks, but I rather have 3 other good starters and a deep bench. I can live with 2 superstars, but having 3 players who are top 15 on one team just isn't fun to watch anymore.
      Super teams is such an NBA idea. It's bad enough the difference one player can make, how it's a player-driven league that can reject coaching/coaches, etc. Now guys like Paul and Melo can just force their way out into a big city with other superstars and in essence run that team, get more calls from the refs. In the NBA, the inmates run the asylum.
      SAMSUNG-SGH-A887/A887UCIJ1 SHP/VPP/R5 NetFront/3.5 SMM-MMS/1.2.0 profile/MIDP-2.1 configuration/CLDC-1.1

      Comment

      • EmpireWF
        Giants in the Super Bowl
        • Mar 2009
        • 24082

        Originally posted by s@ppisgod
        Super teams is such an NBA idea. It's bad enough the difference one player can make, how it's a player-driven league that can reject coaching/coaches, etc. Now guys like Paul and Melo can just force their way out into a big city with other superstars and in essence run that team, get more calls from the refs. In the NBA, the inmates run the asylum.
        SAMSUNG-SGH-A887/A887UCIJ1 SHP/VPP/R5 NetFront/3.5 SMM-MMS/1.2.0 profile/MIDP-2.1 configuration/CLDC-1.1
        Denver could have played hardball and said either you go to New Jersey (for the better package) or we're willing to let you walk and you can take less money.

        They buckled.


        Comment

        • s@ppisgod
          No longer a noob
          • Apr 2011
          • 1032

          Originally posted by EmpireWF
          Denver could have played hardball and said either you go to New Jersey (for the better package) or we're willing to let you walk and you can take less money.

          They buckled.
          Yeah, but they were in a bad spot. They couldn't get the best package they could because teams didn't want to give up a lot of talent unless Melo would sign an extension that he wasn't gonna do because he made it known that he was going to NY. I mean, people went nuts towards Eli because he didn't want to go to SD, but Melo was UNDER CONTRACT with a team and everybody knew where he was going. What if mid-season, Prince Fielder all but came out and said he wanted to play for the Mets? He'd get torn to shreds. In the NBA, eh it's about par for the course.
          SAMSUNG-SGH-A887/A887UCIJ1 SHP/VPP/R5 NetFront/3.5 SMM-MMS/1.2.0 profile/MIDP-2.1 configuration/CLDC-1.1

          Comment

          • EmpireWF
            Giants in the Super Bowl
            • Mar 2009
            • 24082

            Essentially, it was a game of chicken and Denver folded first.


            Comment

            • IamMedellin
              Everything Burns...
              • Nov 2008
              • 10910

              actually the dolan folded by offering half the fuking team for melo

              and leaving the knicks with melo and 5 other scrubs in the playoff, getting their asses handed to them by a team that would go on to be swept by losing finals team...




              Comment

              • Archer
                Go the fuck outside
                • Oct 2008
                • 15303

                Yeah I don't think Denver folded at all

                They somehow got an entire team from the Knicks while they knew Melo was gone in 6 months anyways.

                Comment

                • Juggernaut
                  Sitting on the Sidelines
                  • Dec 2008
                  • 5670

                  Knicks got a great deal all things considering, its just they could have given less.

                  Comment

                  • IamMedellin
                    Everything Burns...
                    • Nov 2008
                    • 10910

                    Originally posted by Juggernaut
                    Knicks got a great deal all things considering, its just they could have given less.
                    they couldve given up nothing, by no means was it a great deal...
                    dolan stepped in, told donnie walsh to go home, all to get melo 3 months early and continue that celebrated knicks run of no playoff wins since 2001...

                    now Walsh is gone, Amare's a question mark and after Melo only 2 other guys are under contract past this year, So who's building this next powerhouse of a team?

                    oh right....





                    Comment

                    • Juggernaut
                      Sitting on the Sidelines
                      • Dec 2008
                      • 5670

                      Isiah's not coming back, that would mark the apocalypse.

                      And look at the pieces we did give Denver.

                      Look at it this way. If Melo had 4 more years on his contract at the time we traded for him, would Denver still take the deal? They Felton (who they traded away), Chandler (whose in China), Galo (useful, but one dimensional), Mozgov (lol shitty russian on a shitty contract). + useless draft picks.

                      New York got a STEAL, Melo is a top 10 player in the NBA. Knick fans are just upset because we could have had him much cheaper. But that's a big could, as we have no idea if Melo would have signed the extension with the Bulls or any other team (and why wouldnt he?) He'd be giving up a lot of dough if he didnt.

                      Comment

                      • Archer
                        Go the fuck outside
                        • Oct 2008
                        • 15303

                        Originally posted by Juggernaut
                        Isiah's not coming back, that would mark the apocalypse.

                        And look at the pieces we did give Denver.

                        Look at it this way. If Melo had 4 more years on his contract at the time we traded for him, would Denver still take the deal? They Felton (who they traded away), Chandler (whose in China), Galo (useful, but one dimensional), Mozgov (lol shitty russian on a shitty contract). + useless draft picks.

                        New York got a STEAL, Melo is a top 10 player in the NBA. Knick fans are just upset because we could have had him much cheaper. But that's a big could, as we have no idea if Melo would have signed the extension with the Bulls or any other team (and why wouldnt he?) He'd be giving up a lot of dough if he didnt.
                        Why would Denver be trading Melo if he had 4 years on his contract?

                        Using that logic... most deadline trades in any sport would be lop-sided.

                        The deal was good for both teams because...

                        1.New York needed/wanted another superstar and role players are easier to find then stars.
                        2.Denver got some actual useful peices back for a player who was NEVER going to sign another contract for them.

                        Comment

                        • EmpireWF
                          Giants in the Super Bowl
                          • Mar 2009
                          • 24082

                          The Jersey offer was tons better than the Knick offer, point being Denver wasn't roped into anything. I fully believe that if they stuck to their guns, they could have sent Melo to Jersey and he would've signed, no matter what the rumors said.

                          A gamble, I guess.
                          ------

                          Apparently, the Knicks are only offering FA's 1-year deals to maintain flexibility for next year. So, don't expect them to sign anyone significant.

                          Plus, New Orleans has spoken with them about Paul but the Post says they don't like the roster and figure there isn't enough for a trade.


                          Comment

                          • FedEx227
                            Delivers
                            • Mar 2009
                            • 10454

                            Why Josh Howard Is Not a Good Fit for the Chicago Bulls
                            Multiple sources, including Chris Broussard of ESPN, have indicated the Chicago Bulls have shown "serious interest" in acquiring free agent Josh Howard ...


                            Read it
                            VoicesofWrestling.com

                            Comment

                            • FirstTimer
                              Freeman Error

                              • Feb 2009
                              • 18729

                              Originally posted by s@ppisgod
                              Super teams is such an NBA idea. It's bad enough the difference one player can make, how it's a player-driven league that can reject coaching/coaches, etc. Now guys like Paul and Melo can just force their way out into a big city with other superstars and in essence run that team, get more calls from the refs. In the NBA, the inmates run the asylum.
                              Racist motherfucker.

                              Comment

                              • Point Blank
                                Needs a hobby
                                • Oct 2008
                                • 14184

                                Find all the latest Rotoworld fantasy sports news, live coverage, videos, highlights, stats, predictions, and results right here on NBC Sports.

                                Comment

                                Working...