Falcons release Vick

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Senser81
    VSN Poster of the Year
    • Feb 2009
    • 12804

    Originally posted by BrahMan
    Not really saying Vick compares to Cunningham, more about what's asked.
    MVP usually come with the numbers, something Vick rarely had in part because of himself, in part because a lack of faith, right or wrong, from the staff that replaced the one that had utmost faith in him and his playmaking ability.
    Yeah, MVP "usually come with the numbers", and Vick never had the numbers. Because he wasn't much of a passer. End of story. Stop comparing Vick to Randall Cunningham.

    Originally posted by BrahMan
    More to how trivial Vick not crossing 3000 is, and really overall how trivial yds racked up is overall depending on what's asked of the QB. Like the people who used to indict Brady for not crossing 4000, wasn't asked, wasn't the game his team played.
    Vick being a poor passer is not 'trivial'. Even when you ignore his absurdly low yardage totals, you can see how inefficient he was. He rarely completed passes to his WRs downfield. Most of the time he was throwing to Crumpler or checking off to his RBs. Stop comparing Vick to Tom Brady.

    Originally posted by BrahMan
    Get Vick to launch 500 passes, you'd get 3000 yds. Probably get bunch of losses too, still get the numbers. Combine his rushing and passing, comparable to other trivial QBs in ball control O's with solid D.
    Agree that you'd get a bunch of losses. If Vick launched 500 passes, he'd be getting sacked 150 times. I find it amazing that nearly every year he played Vick averaged more yards per rush than yards per pass. In his career, he averaged 7.3 yards per rush and only 6.7 yards per pass. Its truly bizarre.

    Originally posted by BrahMan
    Vick's downfall isn't he doesn't want to be a passer, but with his physical gifts its not instinct. He was oblivious and lacked poise in the pocket after years of rolling outside under pressure and chucking it. How he was used to taking over games. Dangerous, but not efficient. Some coaches will accept it, some rather live without it. Can see either side depending on philosophy.
    The coaches who accept it are the ones who are fired in short order. Jim Mora wasn't kidding when he called Mike Vick a 'coach killer'.

    Comment

    • FirstTimer
      Freeman Error

      • Feb 2009
      • 18729

      Originally posted by BrahMan



      Get Vick to launch 500 passes, you'd get 3000 yds. Probably get bunch of losses too, still get the numbers. Combine his rushing and passing, comparable to other trivial QBs in ball control O's with solid D.
      And when Cunningham was throwing for 3000+ yards and running for nearly 1,000yds he was taking teams to the playoffs and winning MVP's. When Vick ran for nearly 1,000 he was 7-9 and murdering dogs.

      STFU


      See below....

      Originally posted by Hasselbeck
      Ever think Mora/Knapp didn't want Vick to throw so much because he sucked as a QB?

      Comment

      • ThunderHorse
        Grind.
        • Nov 2008
        • 2702

        3 days later,

        Sensor and First Timer are still fighting to the death the idea that Vick was a sub-par football player.

        yet they claim the "vick fanboys" who defend him have a problem.

        Comment

        • Senser81
          VSN Poster of the Year
          • Feb 2009
          • 12804

          Originally posted by userpikk187
          3 days later,

          Sensor and First Timer are still fighting to the death the idea that Vick was a sub-par football player.

          yet they claim the "vick fanboys" who defend him have a problem.
          3 days later, userpikk still resorting to personal attacks in his defense of Mike Vick, yet he claims his label of "vick fanboy" is misrepresentative.

          Comment

          • ThunderHorse
            Grind.
            • Nov 2008
            • 2702

            Originally posted by Senser81
            3 days later, userpikk still resorting to personal attacks in his defense of Mike Vick, yet he claims his label of "vick fanboy" is misrepresentative.
            ha,

            The Irony mixed with hypocrisy in this post is full of win.

            Comment

            • Senser81
              VSN Poster of the Year
              • Feb 2009
              • 12804

              Originally posted by userpikk187
              ha,

              The Irony mixed with hypocrisy in this post is full of win.
              Its not ironic nor hypocritical on my part. I back up what I saw with facts (i.e. what actually happened). You flame people. The only explanation is that when I say you are a Vick 'fanboy', you equate 'fanboy' with "n*****" and "motherfu**er".

              You lose.

              Comment

              • ThunderHorse
                Grind.
                • Nov 2008
                • 2702

                Originally posted by Senser81
                Its not ironic nor hypocritical on my part. I back up what I saw with facts (i.e. what actually happened). You flame people. The only explanation is that when I say you are a Vick 'fanboy', you equate 'fanboy' with "n*****" and "motherfu**er".

                You lose.
                right...

                Comment

                Working...