Pinning it all on Favre is ridiculous

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Rayman
    Spic 'n Spanish
    • Feb 2009
    • 4626

    #76
    Originally posted by Prodigal Son
    Favre was quoted as saying, he didn't know how many yards they needed to be in FG range.
    I wonder if he ever does when he throws one of his patented "funballs".



    Comment

    • ram29jackson
      Noob
      • Nov 2008
      • 0

      #77
      Originally posted by Nukleopatra
      If Brett Favre posted here at VSN, I'd groan bomb his fucking ass.

      you get hit that many times in a game and see if you can hang in the league......man, wow , Nina Hagen hehehe you really find the obscure stuff dude...Nina Hagen..of all things hehehe...impressive

      Comment

      • citizenerased
        Rugby World Cup Champion
        • Mar 2009
        • 1580

        #78
        Originally posted by Ratty Ratzlaff
        The storybook ending:



        :jhenbeatkwon:
        Sad and Bitter Packers Fan is Sad and Bitter.
        Don't Sit Down 'Cause I've Moved Your Chair

        Comment

        • DoubleDeuce
          Spellin' n' shit
          • Feb 2009
          • 5873

          #79
          Originally posted by Archer
          Yeah he was on fire with that 60 yard second half performance
          You're just jealous he's better than Peyton Manning

          strong jk

          Comment

          • Bear Pand
            RIP Indy Colts
            • Feb 2009
            • 5945

            #80
            [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ncoblvNQC48"]YouTube- Rome's Jungle Take on Brett Favre Throwing INT in NFC Championship Game[/ame]

            Comment

            • Nukleopatra
              Posts a lot
              • Nov 2008
              • 4365

              #81
              Originally posted by RayManHCP42
              This guy blames Favre (Gloriously NSFW)


              YouTube- 034.AVI
              That is so me during Arizona games.

              :uglyhammer:

              Comment

              • bucky
                #50? WTF?
                • Feb 2009
                • 5408

                #82
                Originally posted by MrBill
                Brett Favre is the best QB in the history of the Packers and yes I know who Bart Starr is.
                Sorry Mr. Bill, but Bart Starr >>>> Brett Favre,

                Comment

                • Senser81
                  VSN Poster of the Year
                  • Feb 2009
                  • 12804

                  #83
                  Originally posted by bucky
                  Sorry Mr. Bill, but Bart Starr >>>> Brett Favre,
                  Bart Starr was great and highly underrated, but I think a point in Favre's favor is that he played QB in an era when the QB was by far the most important player on the field. Favre threw the ball 34 times a game and accounted for about 28 TDs per year. Starr threw the ball about 20 times a game and accounted for about 12 TDs per year.

                  Comment

                  • Bear Pand
                    RIP Indy Colts
                    • Feb 2009
                    • 5945

                    #84

                    Comment

                    • bucky
                      #50? WTF?
                      • Feb 2009
                      • 5408

                      #85
                      Originally posted by Senser81
                      Bart Starr was great and highly underrated, but I think a point in Favre's favor is that he played QB in an era when the QB was by far the most important player on the field. Favre threw the ball 34 times a game and accounted for about 28 TDs per year. Starr threw the ball about 20 times a game and accounted for about 12 TDs per year.
                      Senser, I'm looking more at Playoff games and not regular season. Go look at Starr's number's in the Playoff's (Clutch Games) and compare them to Favre's. It's not even close.

                      Also, the last two SB years, the GB running game was less effective and more of the offensive burden fell on Starr and the passing game, during a time when it was much more difficult for a team to be successful passing.

                      Here is how I break it down:
                      Favre's style of play is much more successful in the regular season. With the gunslinger style, you can have critical mistakes in a game and still have a very good season record. Not as successful in the playoffs where one loss and you are out. A QB can't make those critical mistakes in the playoffs.

                      SO....

                      Favre >>> Starr Regular Season
                      Starr >>>>>>> Favre Playoffs

                      So, to me, Starr >>> Favre

                      Comment

                      • JBregz
                        Follow me! @JBregzz
                        • Nov 2008
                        • 3837

                        #86
                        Originally posted by bucky
                        Senser, I'm looking more at Playoff games and not regular season. Go look at Starr's number's in the Playoff's (Clutch Games) and compare them to Favre's. It's not even close.

                        Also, the last two SB years, the GB running game was less effective and more of the offensive burden fell on Starr and the passing game, during a time when it was much more difficult for a team to be successful passing.

                        Here is how I break it down:
                        Favre's style of play is much more successful in the regular season. With the gunslinger style, you can have critical mistakes in a game and still have a very good season record. Not as successful in the playoffs where one loss and you are out. A QB can't make those critical mistakes in the playoffs.

                        SO....

                        Favre >>> Starr Regular Season
                        Starr >>>>>>> Favre Playoffs

                        So, to me, Starr >>> Favre
                        Lol. You need to get to the playoffs first. When you refer to Favres critical errors you mean his interceptions right?
                        Read this: http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2...rception-myth/

                        Bart Starr had a 1.1 158 TD's and 138 INT
                        Brett Favre had a 1.57 with 497 TD and 316 INT

                        Also Brett Favre played in a era where passing was the way. Which equals more attempts, which ultimately leads to more interceptions one way or another.

                        Bart Starr had those numbers throwing 20 times a game where Favre had those numbers throwing 30+ yards a game.

                        Also when your in a game long enough your ratios tend to get worse as it balances out.

                        Follow me on twitter @JBregzz
                        Follow me on twitch bitch http://www.twitch.tv/jbregz/
                        Redskins TGT Scheduling Thread http://www.virtualsportsnetwork.com/...eduling-Thread

                        Comment

                        • Colonel Angus
                          No longer a noob
                          • Jan 2010
                          • 1935

                          #87
                          Pretty sure Bart Starr has twice as many rings as Favre. He also won 3 other pre-Superbowl NFL Championships. Favre may have the records and the better stats, but Starr was a fucking winner.

                          Comment

                          • dave
                            Go the fuck outside
                            • Oct 2008
                            • 15492

                            #88
                            Originally posted by Josh
                            Lol. You need to get to the playoffs first. When you refer to Favres critical errors you mean his interceptions right?
                            Read this: http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2...rception-myth/

                            Bart Starr had a 1.1 158 TD's and 138 INT
                            Brett Favre had a 1.57 with 497 TD and 316 INT

                            Also Brett Favre played in a era where passing was the way. Which equals more attempts, which ultimately leads to more interceptions one way or another.

                            Bart Starr had those numbers throwing 20 times a game where Favre had those numbers throwing 30+ yards a game.

                            Also when your in a game long enough your ratios tend to get worse as it balances out.
                            Starr played in an era where there was no 5-yard buffer. Receivers got the shit kicked out of them during the entire route.

                            I'm not saying Starr is better than Favre, but the old QBs had it way worse than today's QBs do.
                            My Twitch video link: http://www.twitch.tv/dave374000

                            Twitch archived games link: http://www.twitch.tv/dave374000/profile/past_broadcasts

                            Comment

                            • bucky
                              #50? WTF?
                              • Feb 2009
                              • 5408

                              #89
                              Fellow Packer Buddy. How's it goin????

                              Originally posted by Josh
                              Lol. You need to get to the playoffs first.
                              And both made it to the playoffs quite a bit.

                              Originally posted by Josh
                              When you refer to Favres critical errors you mean his interceptions right?
                              Yes, I'm referring to critical errors in CRITICAL games (like playoff games).


                              Originally posted by Josh
                              Bart Starr had a 1.1 158 TD's and 138 INT
                              Brett Favre had a 1.57 with 497 TD and 316 INT
                              Those are a lot of Playoff TD's and Ints. Cause I was talking about playoffs and critical games. Yes, I do believe those include regular season stats. Now look at the post season stats. This just proves my:

                              Favre >>> Starr Regular Season
                              Starr >>>>>> Favre Playoffs
                              So
                              Starr >>> Favre

                              Originally posted by Josh
                              Also Brett Favre played in a era where passing was the way. Which equals more attempts, which ultimately leads to more interceptions one way or another.
                              Passing is the way because the league made it SOOO MUCH EASIER to pass from the late 70's on. Especially, rules changes in the 90's. Almost every rule change, and how the officials implement the rules have helped offense, scoring and PASSING. Of course passing will be the way. It's WAY easier to do in today's game.

                              Originally posted by Josh
                              Bart Starr had those numbers throwing 20 times a game where Favre had those numbers throwing 30+ yards a game.
                              Starr was at his best in critical games. He was almost perfect in the playoffs.


                              Starr >>> Favre.

                              Comment

                              • JBregz
                                Follow me! @JBregzz
                                • Nov 2008
                                • 3837

                                #90
                                Originally posted by Colonel Angus
                                Pretty sure Bart Starr has twice as many rings as Favre. He also won 3 other pre-Superbowl NFL Championships. Favre may have the records and the better stats, but Starr was a fucking winner.
                                Yeah well thats when the Packers dominated. Simply teams were so uneven.

                                Follow me on twitter @JBregzz
                                Follow me on twitch bitch http://www.twitch.tv/jbregz/
                                Redskins TGT Scheduling Thread http://www.virtualsportsnetwork.com/...eduling-Thread

                                Comment

                                Working...