Every season, there is a 6.25% (1 in 16) chance that an NFL team will play at their home stadium for the Super Bowl. Those are frighteningly bad odds, which is why it's never happened.
But even if it did happen, there won't be any rule changes...frankly, that's a stupid question, and it's even more stupid for you to assume that this is the first year that the team hosting the Super Bowl has a decent shot at making it. Super Bowl tickets are hard to come by, and ridiculously expensive to boot. There won't be a massive influx of fans to create a significant homefield advantage...and even if there were, that's part of the game. What do you suggest they do, host the Super Bowl at stadiums capable of hosting such a big event that do not house NFL teams? Or just wait and see which teams suck ass, and schedule Super Bowls there?
But even if it did happen, there won't be any rule changes...frankly, that's a stupid question, and it's even more stupid for you to assume that this is the first year that the team hosting the Super Bowl has a decent shot at making it. Super Bowl tickets are hard to come by, and ridiculously expensive to boot. There won't be a massive influx of fans to create a significant homefield advantage...and even if there were, that's part of the game. What do you suggest they do, host the Super Bowl at stadiums capable of hosting such a big event that do not house NFL teams? Or just wait and see which teams suck ass, and schedule Super Bowls there?
Comment