Yay or Nay for Rooney Rule?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Champ
    Needs a hobby
    • Oct 2008
    • 14424

    Yay or Nay for Rooney Rule?

    Are you for it or against it?

    There are some pros like giving minorities a chance at a job opportunity.

    Im against it. How does the Rooney Rule not have a guy like Fewell going into interviews wondering if he is a serious contender or just the token interview? It is a disgrace.




    And for the retards like PB


  • NAHSTE
    Probably owns the site
    • Feb 2009
    • 22233

    #2
    I'm gonna vote yes, but first I need to sit down and talk with no and see if that would be the better option.

    Comment

    • mgoblue2290
      Posts too much
      • Feb 2009
      • 7174

      #3
      Its a waste of time for teams who already know who their coach will be. NFL teams are going to hire the best possible candidate, regardless of race. I seriously doubt its helped any coaches get a job they didn't already have based on their abilities.

      Comment

      • Champ
        Needs a hobby
        • Oct 2008
        • 14424

        #4
        Per Wikipedia
        In 2003, the NFL fined the Detroit Lions $200,000 for failure to interview minority candidates for the team's vacant head coaching job. After Marty Mornhinweg was fired, the Lions immediately hired former San Francisco 49ers head coach Steve Mariucci to replace him without interviewing any other candidates. The Lions claimed they attempted to interview other candidates but that the minority candidates withdrew from interviews, believing Mariucci's hiring was inevitable.
        Do you guys think the Lions did something wrong?


        Comment

        • mgoblue2290
          Posts too much
          • Feb 2009
          • 7174

          #5
          Originally posted by Chubby Giangio
          Per Wikipedia


          Do you guys think the Lions did something wrong?
          We've been doing it wrong since 1957.

          Comment

          • Leftwich
            Bring on the Season

            • Oct 2008
            • 13700

            #6
            Originally posted by Chubby Giangio
            Per Wikipedia


            Do you guys think the Lions did something wrong?
            Yeah... not even mooch could have saved that franchise.

            Originally posted by Tailback U
            It won't say shit, because dying is for pussies.

            Comment

            • JayDizzle
              Let's Go All The Way...
              • Nov 2008
              • 14215

              #7
              As long as they're truthfully interviewing and not just going through the motions, I'm okay with the Rooney Rule.

              Comment

              • ryne candy
                Aggie C/O '01
                • Feb 2009
                • 4355

                #8
                I'm for it because if a guy goes in acting like he doesn't care (thinking someone else gots the job), that isn't the teams fault. Word gets around and if the person takes it serious, he may get a shot to another job. It also helps that person get more experience in what kind of questions will be asked.....toning his interviewing skills.

                Comment

                • Senser81
                  VSN Poster of the Year
                  • Feb 2009
                  • 12804

                  #9
                  Yay. Any Dennis Green reference is good.

                  Comment

                  • BigHouseUSA
                    Late to the party.
                    • Jun 2009
                    • 4907

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Chubby Giangio
                    Per Wikipedia


                    Do you guys think the Lions did something wrong?
                    Hiring Mariucci

                    Originally posted by Leftwich
                    Yeah... not even mooch could have saved that franchise.
                    That's because he did everything wrong. Wrong fit, wrong time.
                    Originally posted by mgoblue2290
                    If you want to win, put Drew in.

                    Comment

                    • jeffx
                      Member
                      • Jun 2009
                      • 3853

                      #11
                      I'm torn on this - it does smack of tokenism, but how are these no-name guys going to get noticed?

                      Like ryne said, if the guy has a good interview, he might get referenced for another job. I don't know...

                      Comment

                      • Fox1994
                        Posts too much
                        • Dec 2008
                        • 5327

                        #12
                        I'm for it. It's been said by someone here that Tomlin got his job because of the Rooney rule. And it's not like they have to hire a minority coach, they just have to interview one.

                        Comment

                        • Tengo Juego
                          Posts a lot
                          • Jun 2009
                          • 4289

                          #13
                          I'm a retard.

                          Comment

                          • adembroski
                            All-Inclusive!
                            • Feb 2009
                            • 1815

                            #14
                            I was against the Rooney Rule from the start. It's blatant racism in and of itself.

                            It also encourages teams to interview people who otherwise wouldn't get an interview. This, contrary to popular belief, is not a good thing. I'm almost certain Singletary was named interim because by doing so, the team essentially bypassed the Rooney rule (by calling the interimship an extended interview) and would be allowed to hire Martz as the head coach... unfortunately, the team starting winning, and the fans like Singletary, so the Yorks were kind of forced to go with him... far from being ready.

                            So it works the same way as California's race-based quotas in public universities. The kid from a shitty high school in Compton is not prepared to handle classes at Stanford, but gets the spot because he's black. He fails out. If he'd gone to some community college in Los Angeles, he'd have gotten a degree... and while it wouldn't have been as impressive a degree as the one at Stanford, he's a hell of a lot better of than if he'd failed.

                            Affirmative Action drove up black admission rates at major universities, didn't effect overall black admission rates at all, and drove up black dropout and failure rates in California. When they repealed it, all of these went back to normal.

                            Anytime you create rules that give a race advantages, you will invoke the law of unintended consequences.

                            All that said, there have been positive changes due to the Rooney Rule. However, those changes have taken root. It's time to get rid of it.
                            S.P.Q.A.

                            Comment

                            • MrBill
                              Billy Brewer Sucks Penis
                              • Feb 2009
                              • 0

                              #15
                              I believe for now it serves a purpose but one day in the not so distant future it should no longer be needed.

                              Comment

                              Working...