UFC 98: Machida vs Evans

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Kuzzy Powers
    Beautiful Like Moses
    • Oct 2008
    • 12542

    Originally posted by EmpireWF
    Griffin's chin is not as damaged as Arlovski's. However, Griffin did go 5-rounds with Rampage.

    Griffin has a weaker chin than most, even though he usually always takes a lot of damage.

    Did I just contradict myself?
    Yes.. yes you did. Griffin is one of the toughest LHW's out there. I dont know if that translates into a good chin but Griffin can certainly take a beating.

    Comment

    • Liquidrob
      Izzy is a bum
      • Feb 2009
      • 11785

      Originally posted by EmpireWF
      Griffin's chin is not as damaged as Arlovski's. However, Griffin did go 5-rounds with Rampage.

      Griffin has a weaker chin than most, even though he usually always takes a lot of damage.

      Did I just contradict myself?
      yes you did, lol

      anyway, what I was trying to point out earlier in this thread is that in MMA with the small gloves anything can happen, there are not many fighters in MMA who have great chins, maybe a hand full, the key is more not getting hit flush

      You cant tell me Fedor has a great chin or Silva, Machida, etc...because they rarely if ever get hit flush

      AA has been hit flush just to much, those shots would have dropped 99% of the MMA fighters out there because thats the nature of the sport, only questionable 1 was the Tim punch, but it was a short shot where he was coming in and it stunned him, just look at Hunt/Manhoef, Hunt has been blasted and barely flinches, but he got caught running in against a 185 lber and was put to sleep

      Only truely great chins we have seen in MMA have been Big Nog, Cabbage, Hunt and maybe a couple of others, but it is a short list

      Rampage has a good chin, he was put out by Wand and Shogun but those were more of beatings that finally put him down and has come back strong, Penn has showed a very good chin and can take damage

      I would say there are only a couple glass jaws out there right now, and more of it has to do with age and not being able to get out of the way of a clean shot, Ken is 1 of them, Chuck looks to be in the same boat, Tito cant take a hit, Randy could be put in that same boat but he is better at changing his gameplan and not getting hit in fights and Wand has always had a suspect chin but had great recovery time which he no longer has

      Those gloves are worse than getting hit than bare knuckle, they are wrapped and taped and makes you hand like a brick, if it was still bare knuckle you wouldnt see half the KO's you see now a days

      People say GSP has a weak chin, lol, he hasnt even been hit cleanly on the chin, Serra clubbed him like a baby seal on the ear/back of the ear, I dont see where people think he has a weak chin, just something they say

      sidenote: anyone else find it funny I'm sticking up for AA's chin and I have a picture of him half dead in my avatar? lol
      Last edited by Liquidrob; 05-27-2009, 11:25 AM.
      Liquidrob's Top 10 Fighters Rankings


      The 10 Fighters Who Changed The Game

      Comment

      • Liquidrob
        Izzy is a bum
        • Feb 2009
        • 11785

        Originally posted by Steel Mamba
        Ok, forget who beat who and tell me straight up who has a better standup game machida and silva or fedor?
        if you want to get technical about Machida, his hands are not perfect, he has a great left straight, his best punch, but his other punches are average at best, what makes it work is his tactics and elusiveness

        his footwork is great, but he leaves his chin out there and drops his hands a lot, but he makes it work for him with his other qualities like Fedor does

        even in the end of the rashad fight he was just swinging (he did show nice killer instinct though), if he leaves his chin out like that against Rampage its lights out

        <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/gMYJc1OkttY&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/gMYJc1OkttY&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

        Last edited by Liquidrob; 05-27-2009, 11:44 AM.
        Liquidrob's Top 10 Fighters Rankings


        The 10 Fighters Who Changed The Game

        Comment

        • Liquidrob
          Izzy is a bum
          • Feb 2009
          • 11785

          Originally posted by KINGOFOOTBALL
          Being top 5 in your weight class doesnt qualify someone as elite. You cant sit there and tell me between 155-hw theres minimum 25 "elite" fighters.
          wait, so you're saying there is not 5 elite fighters in each weight class?

          ok, I'll name some

          HW

          Fedor
          Barnett
          AA
          I'll throw in Brock and Mir and leave Tim out for you, but Tim is argueable because of who he fought and Mir and Brock are the 'champs'
          Brock
          Mir

          LHW

          Machida
          Rampage
          Forrest
          Shogun
          Rashad

          MW

          Silva
          Lawler
          Okami
          Belfort
          Winner of Bisping/Hendo
          Depending on weight, Mousasi is right there at MW and on the verge of LHW
          Winner of Maia and Nate is right there also

          WW

          GSP
          Alves
          Fitch
          Hughes
          Jake Shields

          LW

          Penn
          Aoki
          Hansen
          JZ
          Florian
          With guys like Alvarez, Thompson, Griffin, etc.. right behind them

          So, there are atleast 5 a weight class, throw in Rich at MW or LHW if he does something, alos left out Wand and Cro Cop if they make a splash, Nick Diaz wherever you put him, I'm sure I''m missing more, this is just off the top of my head
          Last edited by Liquidrob; 05-27-2009, 12:00 PM.
          Liquidrob's Top 10 Fighters Rankings


          The 10 Fighters Who Changed The Game

          Comment

          • Steel Mamba
            Nasty
            • Nov 2008
            • 2549

            Originally posted by Liquidrob
            if you want to get technical about Machida, his hands are not perfect, he has a great left straight, his best punch, but his other punches are average at best, what makes it work is his tactics and elusiveness

            his footwork is great, but he leaves his chin out there and drops his hands a lot, but he makes it work for him with his other qualities like Fedor does

            even in the end of the rashad fight he was just swinging (he did show nice killer instinct though), if he leaves his chin out like that against Rampage its lights out

            <object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/gMYJc1OkttY&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/gMYJc1OkttY&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>


            It's hard to say that Machida is doing certain things wrong because his style is so unique. It's not a boxing or kick boxing style, it's some slick karate shit, so you can't really analyze him the same way you would with mostly anyone else.

            Let me put it like this, you're going to have a much easier time coming up with a gameplan to beat Fedor standing than you would with Machida.

            Comment

            • Kuzzy Powers
              Beautiful Like Moses
              • Oct 2008
              • 12542

              This argument is getting pretty ridiculous..

              Comment

              • Liquidrob
                Izzy is a bum
                • Feb 2009
                • 11785

                Originally posted by Bob Kuzzy
                This argument is getting pretty ridiculous..
                than dont post if you have nothing to add but this, I for 1 like this thread
                Liquidrob's Top 10 Fighters Rankings


                The 10 Fighters Who Changed The Game

                Comment

                • Steel Mamba
                  Nasty
                  • Nov 2008
                  • 2549

                  Originally posted by Liquidrob
                  fedor has done better against better comp, thats what counts

                  machida probably is the most tactical, never really gets hit, but hasnt faced anyone as good as AA and Cro Cop

                  silva is more flashy, looks pretty but just like Machida hasnt faced the level of striker Fedor has faced
                  I said forget who beat who. But, anyway I know you know the deal, you're just not going to admit it. It's the same thing with basketball, people know Kobe Bryant is better than Jordan, but for whatever reason they're just afraid to admit it. :bandit:

                  Comment

                  • Kuzzy Powers
                    Beautiful Like Moses
                    • Oct 2008
                    • 12542

                    Originally posted by Liquidrob
                    than dont post if you have nothing to add but this, I for 1 like this thread
                    You dont like being called ridiculous Rob? Im sure its not a first for you.

                    You guys are going back and forth and accomplishing nothing. You're discussing whos faced more technical boxers.. as if something like this can be proven on either end. You've also now branched into whether or not Machida or Fedor is harder to plan for. What are the solid guidelines in determining this? You're a Fedor dick rider and noone is going to convince you otherwise.. and its pretty evident you're not going to prove Mamba otherwise either.

                    And dont cry, been adding my input on MMA since before you even came to VSN.
                    Last edited by Kuzzy Powers; 05-27-2009, 12:43 PM.

                    Comment

                    • Liquidrob
                      Izzy is a bum
                      • Feb 2009
                      • 11785

                      Originally posted by Bob Kuzzy
                      You dont like being called ridiculous Rob? Im sure its not a first for you.

                      You guys are going back and forth and accomplishing nothing. You're discussing whos faced more technical boxers.. as if something like this can be proven on either end. You've also now branched into whether or not Machida or Fedor is harder to plan for. What are the solid guidelines in determining this? You're a Fedor dick rider and noone is going to convince you otherwise.. and its pretty evident you're not going to prove Mamba otherwise either.

                      And dont cry, been adding my input on MMA since before you even came to VSN.
                      Umm, so what, this is the most posts that the MMA threads have gotten in VSN history and thats a good thing

                      Hey, I got an idea, lets go back to a couple posts a day, thats sounds like fun!

                      I like reading Steel Mambas posts and RS, etc...its a good discussion and I like to see where people stand on certain fighters and whats there level of MMA knowledge, this is how you get it out of them, not by saying 'GSP is a beast', or stuff like that and everyone agreeing
                      Liquidrob's Top 10 Fighters Rankings


                      The 10 Fighters Who Changed The Game

                      Comment

                      • Kuzzy Powers
                        Beautiful Like Moses
                        • Oct 2008
                        • 12542

                        Hey by all means discuss MMA. Im just saying what the convo has ventured into is ridiculous cause neither of you can really prove a solid point.

                        Point taken.. ridiculous or not, MMA discussion is good discussion.

                        Comment

                        • Liquidrob
                          Izzy is a bum
                          • Feb 2009
                          • 11785

                          Originally posted by Steel Mamba
                          I said forget who beat who. But, anyway I know you know the deal, you're just not going to admit it. It's the same thing with basketball, people know Kobe Bryant is better than Jordan, but for whatever reason they're just afraid to admit it. :bandit:
                          technically, I would say Silva is the best looking of the 3, Machida has the best tactics, Fedor has done it against better strikers

                          machidas and fedor are probably technically on the same level, Machida blends his Karate and Muay Thai with a counter style, Fedor uses more Russian boxing techniques and blends in his Sambo grappling with putting more power behind his shots

                          Fedor can go easily from striking to grappling than both, Machida can keep the distance better than both without getting hit and Silva is more accurate than both

                          sidenote: I find it funny that when I pointed out Machidas technically faults you say you cant judge him because he fights with a karate style but than you hold Fedors striking faults to a boxers style, that doesnt seem right
                          Last edited by Liquidrob; 05-27-2009, 12:59 PM.
                          Liquidrob's Top 10 Fighters Rankings


                          The 10 Fighters Who Changed The Game

                          Comment

                          • Steel Mamba
                            Nasty
                            • Nov 2008
                            • 2549

                            Originally posted by Liquidrob

                            sidenote: I find it funny that when I pointed out Machidas technically faults you say you cant judge him because he fights with a karate style but than you hold Fedors striking faults to a boxers style, that doesnt seem right
                            Well yeah because Fedors striking is based off of boxing, whereas Machidas is not. So, I can't judge him on what he's not trying to do. You can say that the style itself is bad, but given the results he has had with it that's going to be a hard sell.

                            His striking is great and you know this, you even said that Rashad should have taken Machida down, and Rashad has pretty good hands and always comes out with a solid gameplan for the standup battle. He's very, very hard for anyone to strike with and we'll continue to see that.

                            Comment

                            • Liquidrob
                              Izzy is a bum
                              • Feb 2009
                              • 11785

                              Originally posted by Steel Mamba
                              Well yeah because Fedors striking is based off of boxing, whereas Machidas is not. So, I can't judge him on what he's not trying to do. You can say that the style itself is bad, but given the results he has had with it that's going to be a hard sell.

                              His striking is great and you know this, you even said that Rashad should have taken Machida down, and Rashad has pretty good hands and always comes out with a solid gameplan for the standup battle. He's very, very hard for anyone to strike with and we'll continue to see that.
                              of course he is and so is fedor, I dont see why you cant see that point, just because AA threw some glancing blows that did zero damage before being KO'd?

                              Machida, Silva and Fedor have all proven to be great MMA strikers
                              Liquidrob's Top 10 Fighters Rankings


                              The 10 Fighters Who Changed The Game

                              Comment

                              • Liquidrob
                                Izzy is a bum
                                • Feb 2009
                                • 11785

                                Chuck has proven to be a great MMA striker, but he is not technically sound either, but thats what worked for him, the difference between Chuck and Fedor is when he has fought top strikers Fedor has beat them and Chuck has been knocked into next week
                                Liquidrob's Top 10 Fighters Rankings


                                The 10 Fighters Who Changed The Game

                                Comment

                                Working...