This post is really stupid.
Trumbo is 26. By age 26, Dunn had 200 HR's already (actually, 198).
Where is the evidence for this supposed great Trumbo upside? Dunn spent a decade flirting with a .400 OBA every season, Trumbo struggles to climb over .300. Dunn is on his way to his 6th 40+ HR season, Trumbo will probably be lucky if he gets to one.
Dunn's ceiling was .260/.390/.550/.940, 40 HR, 100 RBI, 100 BB, 100 R. He did that for like six consecutive seasons, and he did it at the same age Trumbo is right now. And you are saying Trumbo's ceiling is higher than that? Do you really think Trumbo can exceed those Dunn peaks? And do it well into his 30's?! Seriously?
Basically, you are saying Trumbo is potentially a hall of famer or all time great if his ceiling is higher than Adam Dunn. Because he'd have to be putting up 1.000 OPS's and 45 HR's and 120 RBI and .400 OBA, and he'd have to do it for nearly a decade straight. Into his mid 30's. LOL.
Awful, awful post.