Dell's Good, Bad & Ugly Movie Reviews

[dell71]

Sorority Row
Directed by Stewart Hendler.
2009. Rated R, 101 minutes.
Cast:
Briana Evigan
Leah Pipes
Rumer Willis
Jamie Chung
Audrina Patridge
Julian Morris
Margo Harshman
Carrie Fisher
Matt Lanter​

During a sorority party, a prank goes terribly wrong and one of the most popular members of Theta Pi takes a tire iron through the chest. Since her sorority sisters and dim-witted boyfriend are to blame, but haven’t been witnessed, except by each other, they dump the body in a nearby mine shaft and pretend she’s gone missing. Nine months later, she has apparently risen from the dead and starts picking off her former friends. Oh yeah, this is your run of the mill chop ‘em up so she picks them off…(ahem)…(doing my best Vincent Price impersonation)…one…by…one, muwahahahah…(ahem)…sorry.


Anyhoo, the reality of it is it’s a not-as-good update of <em>I Know What You Did Last Summer</em>, but with almost all girls. By the way, those girls come straight from all those movies about teenagers in cliques. There’s the domineering blonde, the slut, the nerd, the Asian girl…hmmm. How they didn’t have the chubby girl or the Black girl is beyond me. Haven’t these people seen any of the <em>High School Musical</em> movies? Someone must’ve been asleep on the casting couch.

<em>SR</em> also borrows heavily from <em>Scream</em>. The ending is clearly inspired by it. In addition, where that movie uses 70s icon Henry Winkler, AKA The Fonz, this one uses Carrie Fisher, AKA Princess Leia. As the heavy drinkin’, shotgun totin’ house-mom she gets some of the best parts of the movie. Finally, <em>Scream’s</em> director Wes Craven should probably sue the makers of <em>SR</em> for the way the killer is dressed.

If it isn’t obvious, one shouldn’t expect much, other than what one watches these movies for – namely, seeing people get hacked up in creative ways. And for some, the opportunity to see bare breasts without the use of a website that’s potentially harmful to your computer. While there are enough boobies to keep the average boy somewhat interested, it falls woefully short in the death department. At the risk of promoting sadism, I have to say they’re not nearly spectacular enough. Even worse for a slasher fan, they’re often obscured from view by a wall, a sheet, the camera cutting away. I would expect this from a PG-13 money grab like the <em>Prom Night</em> remake but not in a low-budget R-rated hack flick that knows its bread is buttered by blood and guts.

Lame kill scenes combined with a storyline we’ve already seen in other, better movies render <em>SR</em> a rather ho-hum experience. In fact, you might have a hard time remembering what you just saw as the credits start to roll.

The Opposite View: Matthew Turner, ViewLondon

What the Internet Says: 5.1/10 on imdb.com (8/9/10), 23% on rottentomatoes.com, 24/100 on metacritic.com

MY SCORE: 3/10​

SLASHER MOVIE SCORE: 5/10​

 

[dell71]

The Black Gestapo
<strong>Directed by Lee Frost.</strong>
<em>1975. Rated R, 88 minutes.
Cast:
Rod Perry
Charles P. Robinson
Phil Hoover
Angela Brent
Wes Bishop
Lee Frost
Donna Young
Uschi Digard</em>​

The Peoples’ Army is an all Black army in Watts, California trying to protect the community from the White gangsters who get a substantial cut of every dollar that moves within the city. It seems TPA is rather unsuccessful as the gangsters not only come and go as they please, they also do as they please to anyone, anywhere, anytime.

General Ahmed (Perry) is TPA’s leader. His girlfriend Marsha (Brent) is nearly raped by the bad guys. This prompts him to allow his second-in-command, Col. Kojah (Robinson) to head up a special security force with a few handpicked men. The colonel is sick of his boss’ reactionary and seemingly passive leadership and decides to be more productive.

What starts out as just another Blaxploitation flick where the endgame is simply “stickin’ it to The Man” throws us a curveball. We get a very nice twist that elevates it above most of its genre. While doing so, it still maintains much of the silliness the genre is known for: unintentional humor, cheesy 70s music and gratuitous female nudity. Speaking of females, they really get the short end of the stick, pardon the pun. The movie can certainly be construed as misogynistic. Another flaw is our hero. He seems too weak to even hold the position he does, let alone go all Schwarzenegger-in-<strong>Commando</strong> like the way he does.

To the good is the surprisingly sharp dialogue. There’s plenty of 70s lingo and some of it is indeed corny. Still, there are enough lines that actually qualify as good writing which places this a cut above its contemporaries. In all, it’s a very flawed movie. It’s flawed enough to be so bad, it’s awesome!

<strong>MY SCORE: <span style="color:#ff0000;">-10</span>/10</strong>​

 

[dell71]

Percy Jackson & the Olympians:
The Lightning Thief
<strong>Directed by Chris Columbus.</strong>
<em>2010. Rated PG, 118 minutes.
Cast:
Logan Lerman
Brandon T. Jackson
Alexandra Daddario
Pierce Brosnan
Sean Bean
Steve Coogan
Catherine Keener
Rosario Dawson
Joe Pantoliano
Uma Thurman</em>​

Someone has stolen Zeus’s lightning bolt. He’s so pissed, he warns Poseidon that if he doesn’t get it back soon, there will be hades to pay. See, Zeus believes that Poseidon’s son is the culprit. Poseidon’s son is none other than Percy Jackson (Lerman), a high school kid who thinks he’s just an ordinary joe whose life sucks. He’s got a slight case of ADHD and apparently severe dyslexia. However, we soon discover that the writers are fans of <em>The Facts of Life</em> because no one in this movie is handicapped, they’re “handi-capable.” If you’re under 30, you probably don’t get that joke, but whatever. Laugh now, google it later.

This is a classic case of the filmmakers trying to keep us from thinking about the lame-brained script by distracting us with lots of shiny objects. Yes, it’s action-packed almost literally from wall to wall. With beautifully rendered creatures and exciting battles scenes, it’s generally a fun watch.

It’s also incredibly stupid. Things that make no sense kepp happening. There seems to be no logical explanation for many of the things people do. This includes actually trying to kill each other during training excercises. Imagine young soldiers in training actually shooting one another with live rounds. That doesn’t make any sense, now does it?

There are other problems, as well. The attempts at comic relief are horrendous, our heroine evidently likes having a guy that can smack her around and the sidekick has a horrible case of “Magical Negro” disease. If you’re unfamiliar with that particular stereotype, the “Magical Negro” is a black character in American literature or cinema with special powers whose sole purpose is to protect and/or enrich the life of the white protagonist. Think <em>The Legend of Bagger Vance</em> or <em>The Green Mile</em>. While that aspect of those films is bothersome, it worked because they were generally well-written stories whether they used stereotypes or not. In a lesser movie such as this, it’s closer to being an unforgivable offense.

The bottom line on <em>Percy Jackson</em> is it’s often dazzling to “look at” but if you’re over 12, it’s probably a chore to “watch”. Oh, since I know you’re smarter than I, when you see it, or if you’ve already seen it, please explain to me how Pierce Brosnan’s character ever sat in a wheelchair.

<strong>The Opposite View:</strong> <a href="http://www.blogger.com/”http://www.time.com/time/arts/article/0,8599,1963804,00.html”">Mary Pols, Time</a>

<strong>What the Internet Says:</strong> <a href="http://www.blogger.com/”http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0814255/”">5.8/10 on imdb.com</a> (8/11/10), <a href="http://www.blogger.com/”http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/0814255/”">50% on rottentomatoes.com</a>, <a href="http://www.blogger.com/”http://www.metacritic.com/film/titles/percyjackson”">47/100 on metacritic.com</a>

<strong>MY SCORE: 4.5/10</strong>​

 

[dell71]

Brooklyn's Finest
<strong>Directed Antoine Fuqua.</strong>
<em>2010. Rated R, 132 minutes.
Cast:
Don Cheadle
Ethan Hawke
Richard Gere
Wesley Snipes
Will Patton
Lili Taylor
Ellen Barkin
Wass Stevens
Vincent D’Onofrio</em>​

Three Brooklyn police officers with various problems try to do their jobs and gain control of their personal lives. Tango (Cheadle) is so deep undercover he’s starting to forget who he is. Sal (Hawke) is trying desperately to move his family into a bigger, better house. Not only does he already have six kids, his wife Angela (Taylor) is pregnant. Finally, Eddie (Gere) is a mere week away from retirement. Apathy has set in. He’s also a heavy drinker who happens to be in love with a prostitute.

The question of right and wrong is at the heart of all three stories. More importantly, what the benefits are of each and just who is actually benefiting is analyzed. As we follow these three men, these themes arise time and again. Actually reaping rewards for your work is something that seems just out of reach.

Antoine Fuqua, most known for directing <em>Training Day</em>, crafts another engaging cop drama with three situations that feel genuine and have no easy solutions. In fact, many have compared this to <em>TD</em> but I think that’s a mistake. <em>BF</em> is told in a similar style but is a very different film. <em>TD</em> is much more black and white. There is very clearly a hero and a villain. Here, there are plenty of villains. However, it seems that other villains control our her0es. The powers that be are as self-centered and self-preserving as the criminals they purport to hunt.

If there is a movie <em>BF</em> reminds me of, it’s <em>The Departed</em>. Don’t go getting your panties in a bunch. I’m not saying this is anywhere near as good. I am saying that the storyline with Tango is similar as are the fireworks that play out at the end.

Don’t go looking for a Steven Soderbergh style linking of the stories, either. They’re only connected by proximity. None of our three leads seems to know either of the others and only pass one another on the streets a couple times while on their disconnected paths. I suspect this is the source of much of the hatred directed towards this movie since this gives it a disjointed feel. When we come back to one storyline or another we realize it’s been a long time since. In addition, we keep waiting to see how the stories are linked and though it happens physically, it never does on any level worthy of our anticipation. It could just have easily been three separate movies.

Our three leads all turned in outstanding work. There doesn’t seem to be a sour note hit. It is also nice to see the return of Wesley Snipes from his problems with the IRS and the straight-to-DVD hell his career was stuck in. Among the supporting players, Ellen Barkin stood out and displayed a commanding presence during her few scenes.

For me, it’s a thoroughly enjoyable experience. It seems to have received a lot of negative backlash for some of the reasons I gave above. It’s also not one of the best crime dramas of all time, like it was hyped to be. Still, it is a lot more cerebral with less action and more to think about than <em>TD</em>. Like I said, there are no easy answers. The masses tend to shy away from puzzles that aren’t solved for them.

<strong>The Opposite View:</strong> <a href="http://www.blogger.com/”http://www.azcentral.com/thingstodo/movies/articles/2010/03/03/20100303brooklyn0305.html”">Kerry Lengel, Arizona Republic</a>

<strong>What the Internet Says:</strong> <a href="http://www.blogger.com/”http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1210042/”">7.0/10 on imdb.com</a> (8/11/10), <a href="http://www.blogger.com/”http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/brooklyns_finest/”">43% on rottentomatoes.com</a>, <a href="http://www.blogger.com/”http://www.metacritic.com/film/titles/brooklynsfinest”">43/100 on metacritic.com</a>

<strong>MY SCORE: 7.5/10</strong>​

 

[Fox1994]

Is it really that good? I mean, I wanted to see it, Buzzman thought very, very, very lowly of it, and I hold his review opinion almost as high as yours.

 

[dell71]

Is it really that good? I mean, I wanted to see it, Buzzman thought very, very, very lowly of it, and I hold his review opinion almost as high as yours.

I thought so. But I realize it is very disjointed. The three stories really aren't related to each other and that seems to be a turn off. This is one where I know I'm going against the grain, but I'm cool with that.

 

[Fox1994]

I thought so. But I realize it is very disjointed. The three stories really aren't related to each other and that seems to be a turn off. This is one where I know I'm going against the grain, but I'm cool with that.

If you say it's alright, it must be. :wub: I'll check it out.

 

[dell71]

If you say it's alright, it must be. :wub: I'll check it out.

You might even surprise yourself and like it. Let me know.

 

[Maynard]

i watched the entire film, but i honestly didnt enjoy it to much. i didnt mind the stories not being connected. I just didnt feel like any of the stories really mattered.

The film felt like a roller coaster ride without any thrills. your like, ok its a ride i will go on, but im not getting anything out of it

 

[dell71]

Where the Wild Things Are
<strong>Directed by Spike Jonze.</strong>
<em>2009. Rated PG, 101 minutes.
Cast:
Max Records
James Gandolfini
Catherine Keener
Paul Dano
Catherine O’Hara
Pepita Emmerichs
Mark Ruffalo
Vincent Crowley
Sonny Gerasimowicz
Nick Farnell</em>​

Tiny Max (Records) is going through a crisis. His big sister hardly pays him any mind and since his single-but-dating mom works all day, he’s left mostly to his own devices. One night, after throwing a particularly dramatic temper tantrum he runs away from home, goes down to the nearby coast, hops in a boat, crosses a raging sea and winds up on a strange island filled with bickering and depressed creatures that look like out-of-work mascots. When he figures out they want to eat him, he makes up some cockamamie reason why they shouldn’t. He tells them he’s got special powers and promises to make all the sadness in their lives disappear. Of course, the mascots do the only logical thing they can and make him king.

I’ve given you the first thirty minutes. For the next hour plus, we watch Max run, jump and play with the mascots, trying his darndest to keep his promise about ending sadness. Obviously, the task seems impossible. It is especially so when dealing with such a morose group. Conflict raises its head time and again. Most of the time, it involves the easily upset and heartbroken Carol. Carol is voiced wonderfully by James Gandolfini. Yes, Carol is a he. Just a little fyi: Tony Soprano is not actually in the suit. That would be Vincent Crowley. Anyhoo, we come to see Carol largely as this island’s version of Max. Between Carol, Max and the rest of the group, life lessons and dirt clods are bandied about.

It’s an odd watch that ignores any plausible real-world consequences of his actions, including just how much time actually passes. Then again, the movie never definitively says that Max went to a real place. That much is up to you. Whether or not the island is real, the movie focuses solely on the wonderland this particular Alice has fallen into and the therapy it provides. I can see some kids being totally enthralled by watching another child just play while also empathizing with the mascots. I can see others bored to tears because once you get past how these creatures look, it lacks the fizz and pop of most movies aimed at the pre-teen audience. The personalities of our friends are droll, at best. The movie seems to drag on and on…and on. There’s also not much in the way of special fx and though there is humor, it’s not made up of pratfalls and fart jokes.

The lack of crassness may be a welcome reprieve for parents. However, the same sentiments apply. You’ll have to think your way through this one. Normally, that’s not a problem for me, but here it was a chore. Unfortunately, big action scenes where our hero battles the bad guy and hordes of his minions never come. Therefore, if you don’t mind the slowness of the proceedings then this will be a nice treat for you. If you’re easily bored, don’t bother.

<strong>The Opposite View:</strong> <a href="http://www.blogger.com/”http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,20312172,00.html”">Lisa Schwarzbaum, Entertainment Weekly</a>

<strong>What the Internet Says:</strong> <a href="http://www.blogger.com/”http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0386117/”">7.2/10 on imdb.com</a> (8/11/10), <a href="http://www.blogger.com/”http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/where_is_where/”">73% on rottentomatoes.com</a>, <a href="http://www.blogger.com/”http://www.metacritic.com/film/titles/wherethewildthingsare”">71/100 on metacritic.com</a>

<strong>MY SCORE: 5.5/10</strong>​

 

[dell71]

Not Quite Hollywood:
The Wild, Untold Story of OZploitation!
<strong>Directed by Mark Hartley.</strong>
<em>2008. Rated R, 103 minutes.
Cast:
Phillip Adams
Graeme Blundell
Glory Annen
Christine Amor
Victoria Anoux
Quentin Tarantino
Deborah Gray
Jamie Lee Curtis
Dennis Hopper</em>​

In the early 1960s the Australian film industry was almost nonexistent. With a little nudging from the powers that be, the industry explodes with an enormous output of b-movies and flourishes for the next two decades. At some point thes films came to be known as Oz-ploitation and peaked with the movie that made Mel Gibson a star, <em>Mad Max</em>. They were filled with action, gore, low-brow comedy and naked bodies. So, too, is this documentary. We listen to the people who were there and/or helped create the style of the vast majority of Australia’s cinematic exports. Oh, and a lot of famed director/movie geek Quentin Tarantino plus a little Jamie Lee Curtis and Dennis Hopper thrown in. For film buffs and fans of b-movies, this is a goldmine. For others, it’s a bunch of people, most of whom you’ve never heard of, discussing and showing clips from a lot of bad movies you probably didn’t know existed. I fall into the first category and had a blast watching. Many of our interviewees were quite funny and the clips were amazing. I understand that it’s not for everyone, though.

<strong>MY SCORE: 8/10</strong>​

 

[dell71]

Broken Embraces
AKA Los Abrazos Rotos
<strong>Directed by Pedro Almodóvar.</strong>
<em>2009. Rated R, 127 minutes.
Cast:
Penélope Cruz
Lluís Homar
Blanca Portillo
Jose Luis Gómez
Rubén Ochandiano
Tamar Novas</em>​

Sometimes, really good movies aren’t really about what they seem. For instance, to borrow from Roger Ebert, really manipulating his words just a bit to fit my exact interpretation, the classic comedy <em>Some Like it Hot</em> pretends to be about two guys on the run from the mob, their friendship and Joe’s (Tony Curtis) romance with Sugar (Marilyn Monroe). In the end, it’s really just about sex and sexuality. Pedro Almodóvar’s <em>Broken Embraces</em> pulls a sleight of hand at least as impressive.

When the movie opens we meet Harry Cain (Homar) a famous screenwriter and former director who also happens to be blind. One day a frantic young man named Ray X (Ochandiano) mysteriously shows up at his door and says he wants to work with him on a script. Once he figures out who the man is, Harry then reflects on the events that led to this meeting. This is the story <em>BE</em> pretends to tell.

Make no mistake, it does an excellent job of pretending. Sex, jealousy and guilt swirl round and round, spinning a saucy tale. It’s fantastic melodrama, an R-rated soap opera, if you will. To pull off this part of his movie Almodóvar draws on a tour de force performance from Penélope Cruz as Lena. She’s ambitious, seemingly fearless, willing to act on her impulses – consequences be damned – and above all, beautiful. It is indeed shallow to place her looks atop the totem pole of her attributes. However, it’s precisely that which ensnares two very successful men in her constantly tangling web.

If I may digress for a moment, I’ve always felt Cruz performs better in her native Spanish language films. This is no exception. She seems more confident and free. In her American movies she appears to be efforting to enunciate in English which taxes her acting. Then again, it could just be me. Yes, subtitleophobes, this means the movie is in Spanish. Bring your reading glasses…or just switch the DVD over to the English track.

The tale of Cruz’s character and the love triangle in which she finds herself is the wool the director pulls over our eyes. What his film is about has absolutely nothing to do with her or even anyone else in the picture. Through his characters Almodóvar, who also wrote the film, uses the aforementioned themes of sex, jealousy, etc to entertain us. To entertain himself, perhaps even to elighten both himself and the audience, the entire film is an extended metaphor for something else. I won’t tell you what it is here for fear of robbing you of the joy of figuring it out yourself. Rest assured of one thing. First, the movie works on both levels so even if you never pick up on what I’m talking about, it’s a very good watch. Though, I will say he does tell us. In fact, he practically puts it in italicized, underlined bold print. After all, it’s only the most important thing.

<strong>The Opposite View:</strong> <a href=”http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2009/12/17/MVG81B58FE.DTL”>Amy Biancolli, San Francisco Chronicle</a>

<strong>What the Internet Says:</strong> <a href=”http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0913425/”>7.2/10 on imdb.com</a> (8/17/10), <a href=”http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/broken_embraces/”>81% on rottentomatoes.com</a>, <a href=”http://www.metacritic.com/movie/broken-embraces/critic-reviews”>76/100 on metacritic.com</a>

<strong>MY SCORE: 9/10</strong>​

 

[dell71]

Crazy Heart
<strong>Directed by Scott Cooper.</strong>
<em>2009. Rated R, 111 minutes.
Cast:
Jeff Bridges
Maggie Gyllenhall
Colin Farrell
Robert Duvall
Jack Nation
Paul Herman
Tom Bower
Rick Dial</em>​

Country music legend Bad Blake (Bridges) is trying to regain his former glory by traveling across the country performing in rundown bars, bowling alleys and any other place that would have him. He’s broke and hasn’t written a new song in years. He’s the epitome of washed up. However, he still has his name. It’s enough to keep getting him gigs, groupies of advanced ages and far more whiskey than he should drink, though he tries valiantly. When Jean (Gyllenhall), a much younger than he reporter, comes calling for an interview he falls head over heels.

All of this sets the stage for a remarkable performance by Bridges. Every single moment of his work rings true. Before now, the role most people identified with Bridges was that of “The Dude” in <em>The Big Lebowski</em>. In <em>The Men Who Stare at Goats</em>, he plays a military version that character, one that somehow tricks the people in power to give him a little of his own. Consider Bad Blake a real world version. There’s a real sadness and loneliness to the constant party that his life has become. In every town, he plays with a different band at a different dive, sleeps with a different woman in a different hotel room while getting sloppy drunk and puking all along the way. Somehow, it’s all the same and aside from the vomit, none of it is his. Bridges conveys this brilliantly.

We quickly understand why he’s so into Jean. She represents a stability and happiness he’s never known. Just how unstable his life has been becomes more apparent as the movie moves along. We also understand that she is reluctantly going against her better judgment. She’s clearly following her heart and not her head. The movie’s title may actually refer to her.

Gyllenhall is excellent in her role and as Bad’s love interest, obviously she plays off Bridges and he, off her. This aspect works well. For me, though, the performance that really makes Bridges’ work what it is, is that of Colin Farrell as country music superstar, and former Bad Blake protégé, Tommy Sweet. The casting of Farrell is a stroke of genius. He’s the opposite of Blake, and Bridges for that matter, in every way. Most of us who know anything about him would never have dreamed of giving him this role. Nothing about him says country singer. Yet, that’s precisely why he works so well. His glossiness serves to authenticate our hero.

Sadly, it’s a case where the performances are better than the actual movie. Don’t get me wrong, it’s not at all bad. It’s actually quite good. However, after a certain event involving Jean’s son Buddy (Nation), it goes on autopilot. We know what’s coming and the film dutifully follows the path it laid for itself. Still, Jeff Bridges is worth the price of admission. I will warn you, if you just can’t stand even a note of country music, steer clear. If you’re a fan of the genre, or at least willing to overlook it, you’re in for a treat.

<strong>The Opposite View:</strong> <a href="http://www.blogger.com/”http://www.philadelphiaweekly.com/screen/reviews/Crazy-Heart-81283832.html”">Sean Burns, Philadelphia Weekly</a>

<strong>What the Internet Says:</strong> <a href="http://www.blogger.com/”http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1263670/”">7.4/10 on imdb.com</a> (8/20/10), <a href="http://www.blogger.com/”http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/crazy_heart/”">92% on rottentomatoes.com</a>, <a href="http://www.blogger.com/”http://apps.metacritic.com/video/titles/crazyheart”">83/100 on metacritic.com</a>

<strong>MY SCORE: 7.5/10</strong>​

 

[dell71]

FINALLY!

You guys are all caught up with the rest of the world. If you didn't know, these reviews also appear in 2 other places online. One of them is my blog (link in my sig), the other shall remain anonymous so as not to invoke any violent reactions.

Since you've been behind all this time, I'm going to put you one up, temporarily at least. The next review is one you're getting before either of those other places...

 

[dell71]

Kick-Ass
<strong>Directed by Jane Goldman and Matthew Vaughn.</strong>
<em>2010. Rated R, 117 minutes.
Aaron Johnson
Christopher Mintz-Plasse
Mark Strong
Chloë Grace Moretz
Nicolas Cage
Omari Hardwick
Michael Rispoli
Clark Duke
Garrett M. Brown
Dexter Fletcher</em>​

Like a lot of boys, Dave (Johnson) wonders what it would be like to be a superhero. He even carries the fantasy one step further and tries to act it out in real life. He gets his hands on a green wetsuit, names himself Kick-Ass and takes to the streets looking like a jade ninja. From there ensues a wild ride full of perfectly just over the top violence and fueled by an absolutely wicked sense of humor. It’s based on the graphic novel of the same name.

This isn’t <em>Batman Begins</em> so there’s no real training for superhero. Things don’t go smoothly. They go about as good as if you yourself decided to don tights and become a crimefighter. Actually, they go better because he doesn’t wind up dead within the first few minutes. Despite becoming a media sensation, he’s not a very good superhero.

Closer to the real deal, but more homicidal than most, we learn, is Hit-Girl (Moretz), a pint-sized killing machine and her father Big Daddy (Cage). Like everyone else who’s watched this movie I have high praise for Hit-Girl. She totally steals the show. We need more Hit-Girl. However, I’ve not seen anyone give Nicolas Cage his just due. I get that there’s a lot of Cage hatred out there. He’s done a lot of dreadful movies. I also understand that most of <em>KA</em>’s audience is too young to remember what Cage is making fun of. His parody of Adam West’s version of Batman is just dead-on and completely hilarious. Well, it’s hilarious if you have the old TV series as a reference point. If so, you’ll recognize everything he does and might laugh yourself to tears.

This brings me to my next point. <em>KA</em> isn’t just an action-comedy. It’s a brilliant spoof of all things superhero. It’s simultaneously reverential and irreverent. It lovingly skewers the genres of literature, television and cinema that birthed it, holding their feet to the fire even as it gives them a hug. Comic book fans will notice the subtleties that make <em>KA</em> special. For instance, notice the unspoken joke of our hero wearing glasses in his regular life but not when dressed as his alter-ego. What makes it great is that even if you miss those little touches you can still have a great time watching it. This is because the best spoofs use the genre they’re spoofing for inspiration, making fun of that genre’s absurdities while also working within its confines and stand alone as narratives.

In those dreadful “____ Movie” (Scary, Date, Dance, etc) flicks there appears to be no love for whatever they’re trying to parody. It’s all mean-spirited and void of creativity. They merely reenact a scene from some other movie and add something gross to it. When they’re over, you can’t really remember the story it’s trying to tell. Here, you needn’t have seen any specific movie to get most of the jokes. You only have to be familiar with a certain type of movie. This is why <em>Young Frankenstein</em> works for people who’ve never actually seen the original <em>Frankenstein</em> or <em>Scream</em> for people who aren’t necessarily fans of slasher movies. <em>Kick-Ass</em> is one of the best spoofs.

<strong>The Opposite View:</strong> <a href="http://www.blogger.com/”http://www.moviedayatthecourt.com/?p=330”">Stephen Himes, Film Snobs</a>

<strong>What the Internet Says:</strong> <a href="http://www.blogger.com/”http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1250777/”">8.1/10 on imdb.com</a> (#183 all time as of 8/20/10), <a href="http://www.blogger.com/”http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/1217700-kick_ass/”">76% on rottentomatoes.com</a>, <a href="http://www.blogger.com/”http://www.metacritic.org/film/titles/kickass”">66/100 on metacritic.com</a>

<strong>MY SCORE: 10/10</strong>​

 

[Palooza]

I love you, Dell.

 

[CrimsonGhost56]

I love you, Dell.

me too

threesome?

 

[stevsta]

How about a review of young frankenstein

 

[dell71]

I love you, Dell.

me too

threesome?

O...

Y not?

 

[dell71]

How about a review of young frankenstein

One of my all time faves...hate to be a tease, but look for it in October.