First, Learn to multiquote properly cunt.
rajonrondo said:
No, it has nothing to do with my argument in the first place. I've said countless times I am basing my MVP opinion on who the best player in the league is. If you can't comprehend that, I've lost hope in you.
rajonrondo said:
and completely disregard the fact that they acquired Carlos Boozer...
Boozer is obviously a good player but guess what? Rose was putting up virtually the same stat line without Boozer. And if we are basing it off best player, then team records are out the door as it's possible for the best player to play on a bad team. So the Bull sbeing 9-6 without Boozer, using your logic, is a moot point.
Good work missing the point
rajonrondo said:
No.. You know wtf tongue in cheek means?
Then you said it's "real". And you're asking me if I know what tongue in cheek means?
Are you intentionally being this clownish?
rajonrondo said:
Besides Nash's 2 MVP's, I don't have a problem with who won it.
So Karl Malone was the best player in the league over Michael Jordan? Then MJ became the best player in the league again the next season?
LULZ.
rajonrondo said:
Where did I ever say that?
I never said you said that. I was asking a question probing the fact that you are ignoring obvious points that while you point out the Bulls got better because they got Thibideau and Boozer and still had Lulz Deng you continue to ignore that the Heat got better with James playing with Dywane Wade and Chris Bosh.
For fucksake.
rajonrondo said:
You keep thinking I'm basing my argument on how well the team is doing. Get that out of your diminutive brain. It's not even the basis for it.
Then why bring up the Bulls 9-6 record without Boozer? Why bring up the collapse of the Cavs? If teams records have nothing to do with it then why did you bring them up? Holy shit you're dense...
,
.
rajonrondo said:
Well good thing Derrick Rose has him!
rajonrondo said:
James decrease in stats, and Rose's improvement, and Rose still isn't better than LeBron... So... Yeah. As far as stats go Rose isn't on LeBron's level. As far as talent, he isn't, and as far as team success, he isn't. The Bulls didn't have a turnaround season. Going from being .500 to being better than .500 isn't a turnaround, it's an improvement.
Yeah they are merely "better than .500". They are 20 fucking games over .500 and two or so games back of the Miami Heat/Celtics. Right now it's impossible for the Heat to finish more than 20 games better than they did last season. The Bulls still can.
Then again the Bulls record, according you shouldn't matter so it doesn't matter if they have a turnaround season or not so putting down anything anyone said about the Bulls record or a turnaround season shouldn't have even gotten a response from you.
rajonrondo said:
Of course I can. The Cavaliers went from being the first seed 2 years in a row, to being a complete shit show. 99% of the reason is because LeBron left. The Bulls went from being a .500 team to a 38 win team so far.
They are 20 fucking games over .500. Saying they are a"38 win team" is a nice try at hiding that but you fail.
Quote:
rajonrondo said:
On subject of names, you're from Illinois, so I'm sure you don't have red tinted glasses on or anything.
My name has nothing about me being from Illinois. Nice segway fail. Also, my red tinted glasses haven't ever prevented me from screaming that Luol Deng is shit, I hated the Noah draft pick at the time. Can't stand the Bulls front office etc. As if me wanting Rose to be MVP is because I'm a Bulls fan.....and nobody else has him in the discussion. I'm not touting Luol Deng as an All Star. I'm forwarding Derrick Rose as an legit MVP candidate, which is a REALLY easy case to make...since most people with a brain are doing it.