Enough is enough. Peyton Manning is the greatest QB of all time.

[bucky]

I guess when you only have maybe 2 or 3 seconds in the pocket

Again, McCarthy gives Rodgers 2.5 seconds to get rid of the football.

Manning didn't cause the loss by himself (the entire team played poorly), but he contributed to it.

 

[Aso]

the fact that you know less than nothing about football, yet you continue to post about it, is just baffling. do you even know what padding your stats means? let me educate you. when manning only has 109 yards in the first half its because the defense only allowed that many yards. when seattle is up 36-0, then let off the gas a bit, they allowed manning to throw for 171 yards in the 2nd half. Manning padded his stats when the defense wasnt playing at full throttle

its why they call it garbage time...kind of like your posts.

Especially after Richard Sherman got injured they let up.

 

[Maynard]

Don't even bother, TT, not worth the time to explain anything to Aso. Let's remember, he is the same guy who posted "He played terribly. The majority of his completions were under 10 yards and A LOT under 5 yards."

Silly kid thinks this is a game of Madden and you can just call a Hail Mary ever play.

I guess when you only have maybe 2 or 3 seconds in the pocket due to your offensive line getting blown up, you should call plays that take a bit longer than that to develop, right? Right.

this coming from the guy who didnt think manning was at fault for the safety....manning was the only one who didnt know the ball was going to be snapped, but yeah, its not his fault

 

[Houston]

The center took full responsibility for the snap debacle.

 

[Primetime]

The center took full responsibility for the snap debacle.

Of course he did. It's called being a good teammate.

 

[Aso]

It is hard not to blame Peyton when you see the ENTIRE O-line all take their first step at the same damn time. They were all perfectly in-sync on what would've most likely been a run play it looked like.

 

[jms493]

sorry...but this is still valid

 

[Hasselbeck]

yes, all those problems complications and failures and he still threw for 280. You cant pad the stats unless you actually do it.

Got it.. so if you lose by 35 in a Super Bowl it's all good if you can pad them stats in the process.

:rambo:

 

[ram29jackson]

Got it.. so if you lose by 35 in a Super Bowl it's all good if you can pad them stats in the process.

:rambo:

yes, because only the greatest QB of all time is capable of that

 

[ram29jackson]

just putting this here because I saw it and liked it

 

[ram29jackson]

The Following User Says No Thank You to ram29jackson For This un-Useful Post:
Maynard

LOL what a dumbfuck you are. That Montana picture synopsizes your entire argument and yet you groan me for it ?.....forget you, you are just a complete childish idiot.

 

[ram29jackson]

 

[spursup]

McCarthy gives Rodgers 2.5 seconds to get the ball out. Manning had two ints with his team down 29-0 in the first half or early in the second. Manning contributed to the loss. The entire team caused the loss, but Manning contributed to it. You're sounding as bad as Bill trying to defend Favre. Manning did NOT have a good game.

I didn't think Manning was GOAT before the game. I would have picked two other QB's before him. And the game did nothing to change my mind. I'm OK with someone else believing Manning is GOAT. He has a tremendous resume. But I would pick Unitas and Montana before Manning.

There's a difference between calling a play to take 2.5 seconds and calling a play that is supposed to take 4 or 5 seconds and only having 2.5. Manning didn't have open receivers yet constant pressure in his face. The checkdowns were all he had when he had to get rid of the ball.

 

[bucky]

There's a difference between calling a play to take 2.5 seconds and calling a play that is supposed to take 4 or 5 seconds and only having 2.5. Manning didn't have open receivers yet constant pressure in his face. The checkdowns were all he had when he had to get rid of the ball.

So Manning should have audibled to different plays that only take 2.5 seconds. That's what Rodgers has to do. Hell, Rodgers is expected to get rid of the ball in less than 2.5 seconds. That's how they practice. Hell, McCarthy has a horn that blows after 2.5 seconds in practice and the ball had better be out of Rodgers hands. If Manning is running plays that take 4/5 seconds when he knows he has less than 3, that doesn't support your argument. You're sounding like a blind Manning homer.

I was a Manning fan before Peyton even started college. Archie was my second favorite QB behind Bart Starr back in the 60's early 70's. I felt really bad for Archie being on such putrid Saints teams. When his kids started playing QB, I was instant fans of theirs. I'm just not some blind Manning homer. Top 5 QB all time, yes. Top 3 QB all time, very likely. GOAT, I don't believe so. And he did not have a good SB performance on Sunday.

 

[ram29jackson]

So Manning should have audibled to different plays that only take 2.5 seconds. That's what Rodgers has to do. Hell, Rodgers is expected to get rid of the ball in less than 2.5 seconds. That's how they practice. Hell, McCarthy has a horn that blows after 2.5 seconds in practice and the ball had better be out of Rodgers hands. If Manning is running plays that take 4/5 seconds when he knows he has less than 3, that doesn't support your argument. You're sounding like a blind Manning homer.

I was a Manning fan before Peyton even started college. Archie was my second favorite QB behind Bart Starr back in the 60's early 70's. I felt really bad for Archie being on such putrid Saints teams. When his kids started playing QB, I was instant fans of theirs. I'm just not some blind Manning homer. Top 5 QB all time, yes. Top 3 QB all time, very likely. GOAT, I don't believe so. And he did not have a good SB performance on Sunday.

great , didn't help Rodgers much in the playoffs though...lol just saying,its neither here nor there

 

[spursup]

So Manning should have audibled to different plays that only take 2.5 seconds. That's what Rodgers has to do. Hell, Rodgers is expected to get rid of the ball in less than 2.5 seconds. That's how they practice. Hell, McCarthy has a horn that blows after 2.5 seconds in practice and the ball had better be out of Rodgers hands. If Manning is running plays that take 4/5 seconds when he knows he has less than 3, that doesn't support your argument. You're sounding like a blind Manning homer.

I was a Manning fan before Peyton even started college. Archie was my second favorite QB behind Bart Starr back in the 60's early 70's. I felt really bad for Archie being on such putrid Saints teams. When his kids started playing QB, I was instant fans of theirs. I'm just not some blind Manning homer. Top 5 QB all time, yes. Top 3 QB all time, very likely. GOAT, I don't believe so. And he did not have a good SB performance on Sunday.

Let me go back to what I originally said. I said Manning had a good game, not a great game, not a bad game, just good. He threw for 280 yards while under constant pressure and having had possessions taken away. Drives just weren't finished, touchdowns weren't scored, playcalls were terrible, defense didn't do anything to stop the Seahawks.

 

[Hasselbeck]

Let me go back to what I originally said. I said Manning had a good game, not a great game, not a bad game, just good. He threw for 280 yards while under constant pressure and having had possessions taken away. Drives just weren't finished, touchdowns weren't scored, playcalls were terrible, defense didn't do anything to stop the Seahawks.

:forgetit:

Fantasy Football has ruined people's idea of what is a good and bad game. Over 60% of his stats came when Denver was down 29-36 points. Peyton also got away with ANOTHER pick 6 before half on 4th and 2 (Thurmond fell down), and a pass that would have been picked off by Sherman had Demaryius not interfered.

Again.. the Super Bowl loss does not take away from what Peyton did this season or his entire career. He's a Top 3 QB all-time (I personally feel the order is Montana, Manning, Elway) .. but he did NOT play well on Sunday. That's not insulting Peyton.. it's telling the truth.

 

[ram29jackson]

:forgetit:

Fantasy Football has ruined people's idea of what is a good and bad game. Over 60% of his stats came when Denver was down 29-36 points. Peyton also got away with ANOTHER pick 6 before half on 4th and 2 (Thurmond fell down), and a pass that would have been picked off by Sherman had Demaryius not interfered.

Again.. the Super Bowl loss does not take away from what Peyton did this season or his entire career. He's a Top 3 QB all-time (I personally feel the order is Montana, Manning, Elway) .. but he did NOT play well on Sunday. That's not insulting Peyton.. it's telling the truth.

Elway before Brady ?

 

[spursup]

:forgetit:

Fantasy Football has ruined people's idea of what is a good and bad game. Over 60% of his stats came when Denver was down 29-36 points. Peyton also got away with ANOTHER pick 6 before half on 4th and 2 (Thurmond fell down), and a pass that would have been picked off by Sherman had Demaryius not interfered.

Again.. the Super Bowl loss does not take away from what Peyton did this season or his entire career. He's a Top 3 QB all-time (I personally feel the order is Montana, Manning, Elway) .. but he did NOT play well on Sunday. That's not insulting Peyton.. it's telling the truth.

I don't play fantasy football, and you act as if the Seahawks don't do half the stuff they get away with. There were some pretty obvious missed calls against Seattle.

 

[bucky]

Let me go back to what I originally said. I said Manning had a good game, not a great game, not a bad game, just good. He threw for 280 yards while under constant pressure and having had possessions taken away. Drives just weren't finished, touchdowns weren't scored, playcalls were terrible, defense didn't do anything to stop the Seahawks.

Even on good days, Rodgers is always under pressure. 280 yards does not mean a "good day". 40ish QB rating? 2 ints before halftime while his team goes down by 29 and he goes scoreless. That doesn't equal "good day". We just disagree.