Thanks for making another idiotic post.
But they do do it. So it's not "once in a life time".
Devin Hesters KO return for a score had never been done before either.....
The once in a lifetime part isn't simply a linebacker returning an int for a td, it's much more than that jeezus you are dense. It's once in a lifetime because we will never see again not in your lifetime nor mine, a play in the super bowl that was that significant again. A last minute TD equals 7 points. Awesome, it wins the game, amazing. This play was a never before seen 100 yard INT return, the longest in Super Bowl HISTORY...let me rephrase, that. This was the LONGEST PLAY OFFENSE OR DEFENSE in Super Bowl history, and it was done by a beastly linebacker as he broke tackles and rumbled the distance. What aren't you getting about this play? I don't understand why you would even argue that this is the kind of play you see a lot of. It's never been seen before, or since. I can completely accept ones opinion that this isn't the best play ever, or even if somebody didn't think it was top 5, that's fine. But to say this play happens all the time is fucking stupid. 3 other tds returned in that year, one for 89 yards...ONLY 1 for 100 yards in the Super Bowl. That shit doesn't happen. Pull your head out man.
Once. Only once from 1st and 1 to score, only once.
And even with this God like play....the Steelers STILL needed a last second touchdown catch to win the game...so explain to me again why this play "turned" the game so much in the Steelers favor?
OMG you are so stupid. Simple math bub. The final score was 27-23. Take 7 away from Pittsburgh, add 7 to the Cards what do you have? Hell add 3 to the Cards what do you have? What would have happend if Harrison didn't score? 27-23, take away 7 and the Steelers still lost that game. You are a dumbass right now, without that play the Steelers can't win the fucking game. It was a game changing play no matter how you slice it.
Quit being an douche homer. Harrison made a great play. No one is saying he didn't. Holmes play in some people's opinion was a greater play because in the end it meant more. If Holmes drops that pass or Ben throws a pick like he thought he had when he let go of the football Harrison's play means nothing more than the Hester kick return. Holmes catch made Harrison's play matter at the end of it all.
Here is the thing, IMO it's the greatest play ever and I'm disrespected like the Harrison play can't be considered by anybody as the best play ever. Obviously that's not the case, ask Steve Young, Dieon Sanders, and look at the many articles written about it. Just days later people were arguing if this was the best play ever, or if it were better than the Holmes catch. To each there own I guess. Not to take ANYTHING away from the Tyree catch or the Holmes TD, but to me the defensive play was more impressive. If you were going to tell me Holmes would have the game winning TD in that game I would have most likely said that's possible. If you were going to tell me Harrison is going to take a Warner INT 100 yards for a potential 14 point swing at any point of the game let alone to close out halftime I would have said hell no, that's just a retarded statement.
http://fifthdown.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/02/02/the-day-after-assessing-super-bowl-xliii/
http://www.bigblueview.com/2009/2/3/745527/the-best-super-bowl-imposs
And now this article. So it's at the very least up there. I'm just defending the Harrison play because I really think the play was the best ever. I'm not arguing over the Holmes catch, why is that? I mean I'm a homer right? I honestly believe, Steeler fanhood aside, it was the best play ever.