How good are the Green Bay Packers?

[dave]

You are over-analyzing this. The way you're thinking it's a lose-lose. So basically once you reach 10-0, you're fucked.

Winners win. They don't think about shit like "I might get knocked out."

Indy did that.

In defence of the Pats, they didn't. They played their asses off and just lost a Super Bowl.

I am not over-analyzing anything. You play to win. Indy didn't ... and that attitude killed them that season.

Edit:
I rarely groan, but you get it for your groan. I wasn't being argumentative or petty. I brought up a cogent argument and wanted a proper debate. You cried and groaned ... so I replied.

 

[Aso]

Winners win. They don't think about shit like "I might get knocked out."

Indy did that.

In defence of the Pats, they didn't. They played their asses off and just lost a Super Bowl.

I am not over-analyzing anything. You play to win. Indy didn't ... and that attitude killed them that season.

Edit:
I rarely groan, but you get it for your groan. I wasn't being argumentative or petty. I brought up a cogent argument and wanted a proper debate. You cried and groaned ... so I replied.

Again, you're over-analyzing this. I groaned you because your post sucked. I didn't cry about anything. If you think my post sucks, then groan it...

 

[Houston]

It sent a message to the league - and to their own players - that they weren't good enough to go 16-0 and win the Super Bowl. It sent a message of weakness.

:nono:

The only message it sent was that they didn't want to risk injury...

 

[dave]

Houstonboi - you're just hi-jacking this. You're the reason I just put frozen pizzas in the oven instead of ordering. Thanks a lot.

 

[dave]

:nono:

The only message it sent was that they didn't want to risk injury...

If you have a chance to go 16-0, you do it. You don't show fear.
Winners win.

That potential 16-0 Colts team got what it deserved.

You sit the stars when the win is in hand.

The Colts had a chance to be special, they chose to be wimps.

I give the Pats credit, they wanted to be special. They lost a game, but it wasn't because they were wimps ... they just lost a game.

 

[ZoneBlitz]

The Colts sitting their starters for games 15 and 16 had nothing to do with them losing to the Saints in the SB.

 

[Colonel Angus]

I thought this thread was about the Packers?

 

[Houston]

Winners win.

 

[leaffan]

Dave with an absolute batch of terrible posts in this thread lol.

 

[dave]

The Colts sitting their starters for games 15 and 16 had nothing to do with them losing to the Saints in the SB.

Maybe, maybe not.
We'll never know.
IMO, if the Colts had entered that game as unbeaten, it could have changed the dynamics of that game.
Instead, they entered that game as a team afraid to lose a Super Bowl.
Again, just my opinion.

 

[Aso]

Maybe, maybe not.
We'll never know.
IMO, if the Colts had entered that game as unbeaten, it could have changed the dynamics of that game.
Instead, they entered that game as a team afraid to lose a Super Bowl.
Again, just my opinion.

To all the mods who have yet to ban this fucker based off of stupidity alone...

:fuckyou:

 

[dave]

Dave with an absolute batch of terrible posts in this thread lol.

You're so predictable.
Honestly, cut the carbs. Get over the fact you're fat and unhappy.

You're a bright guy ... get over piling on popular opinion and on me. You have something to offer society. Quit reading comic books and piling on.

 

[dave]

To all the mods who have yet to ban this fucker based off of stupidity alone...

:fuckyou:

Please.
You and Houstonboi can go on having virtual sex with one another. I have no issue with that. But, please, get over the piling on me. At least I have my OWN opinion and don't just follow you fruits.

 

[Houston]

IMO, if the Colts had entered that game as unbeaten, it could have changed the dynamics of that game.
Instead, they entered that game as a team afraid to lose a Super Bowl.
Again, just my opinion.

So what you're saying is that it's a good thing The Packers lost, because now they only have to focus on winning the superbowl.
But at the same time if the Colts had gone 16-0 and had the extra pressure of winning it all undefeated, they would've played better?


Hmm dave, tell me more....

 

[dave]

So what you're saying is that it's a good thing The Packers lost, because now they only have to focus on winning the superbowl.
But at the same time if the Colts had gone 16-0 and had the extra pressure of winning it all undefeated, they would've played better?


Hmm dave, tell me more....

There's a difference between the Packers and Colts, you dumb fuck.
The Packers weren't trying to lose ... they just lost.
The Colts pretty much threw in 16-0 by sitting out Manning.

Admittedly, I don't expect you to know the difference, but you should.

 

[Aso]

Please.
You and Houstonboi can go on having virtual sex with one another. I have no issue with that. But, please, get over the piling on me. At least I have my OWN opinion and don't just follow you fruits.

Are you kidding me? You think I'm a person to follow popular opinion? I was one of the only people who said Randy Moss was done last year and that Vincent Jackson was better. That discussion never ended and I took a lot of heat.

The only difference is what you're saying does have a shred of common sense in it.

 

[dave]

Are you kidding me? You think I'm a person to follow popular opinion? I was one of the only people who said Randy Moss was done last year and that Vincent Jackson was better. That discussion never ended and I took a lot of heat.

The only difference is what you're saying does have a shred of common sense in it.

That potential 16-0 Colts team showed its true colours ... proving my point.

 

[ZoneBlitz]

IMO, if the Colts had entered that game as unbeaten, it could have changed the dynamics of that game.

Possibly one of the stupidest things ive ever heard, rivaled by the theory of the Broncos sabotaging Tim Tebow (which was also said by you).

 

[dave]

Possibly one of the stupidest things ive ever heard, rivaled by the theory of the Broncos sabotaging Tim Tebow (which was also said by you).

And you're wrong too. But I give you some credit for not groaning me.
I disagree with you, but that's it.

BTW, I stand by my Tebow theory. The Broncos never truly wanted him to succeed. He did despite their wishes.

 

[MrBill]

I'd say the Packers are still pretty damn good. They haven't lost a game since last December and along the way picked up another Super Bowl championship. They have the best record in the league and can clinch HFA next week with a win over the woeful Bears. The Chiefs caught the Packers looking forward to their next two games over division rivals at home and they won't come out flat for those games.

Today was a trap game plain and simple. No need for panic in Green Bay.