well, if by saying its basically the same, meaning they still run the ball and they still pass the ball, then yes, i agree. But schematically the offenses are much more advanced in their styles, languages and designs. Sure alot of things from 60 years ago are still seen in variation in todays game, but things have evolved into somthing much more complex then what they had in the 60ies, 70ies and 80ies
even defenses have dramitically changed. The 46 has evolved into something more then it was 25 years ago. The zone blitz schemes are even more dynamic then they were in the 90ies when the steelers ran it under capers.
to say the game is basically the same is laughable......Gruden is a coach from todays game. He is refreshing because he knows todays game. The same cant be said for fossils like madden who time is long gone....remember his days 30 years ago? When the Raiders had nothing but a deep passing game....nobody runs that shit these days as a primary scheme of the offense...
i wouldnt put jaworski into a class with madden, but he is growing old and his personality is just as old on the air
Advanced ?
Complexity doesnt make it any different. Going to the game with 10 or 100 pass plays doesnt change the fact that a corner route is supposed to be run and thrown a specific way.
Newer guys do have a better idea of what trends , styles are likely to produce results , but it doesnt change the fact teams try to gimmick and style there way around the basic principles.
What new pass routes , blocking schemes , run plays , type of tackle , type of throw do you see that these old guys dont know ?
Amazing that Peyton Manning in his mega complex offense is out before every practice throwing and timing the
same passing tree I did 10 years ago , and Johnny Unitas did in the 60s.
Madden was more in touch with todays game than than anyone in any announcing or analyst booth. His access to footage , game plans , locker rooms , meetings was unparalleled. NOONE in todays game had the freedom and access Madden had. Steve Sabol/NFL films are the only ones that come to mind. Playing things down for the audience doesnt equate to not knowing the game.
The only thing that changes and puts you out of touch is the older you get the more entrenched you are in your comfort zone. You cant adapt and change your line of thinking like you used to making you a boring or annoying TV guy.
Not caring for a 5 wr set or being steadfast that it doesnt work isnt the same as being baffled by the complexity of the play.