Least and Most Burned Cornerbacks

[Aso]

Did Hall really get burned 70 times out of 100?

Well by burn they mean simply made a catch on. But Deangelo Hall was constantly beat in 2010. He only succeeds in zone heavy schemes.

 

[Rayman]

He picked off Cutlulz 4 times and got some TD's this year.

So he's automatically the best in the league.

Remember when TO basically shat on him (after spitting on him)? :smug2:

Then there's this:

 

[1ke]

Just think about what Halls numbers would look like if Jay Cutler wasnt in such a giving mood when they played....

 

[Shayn•Da•Pain]

Just think about what Halls numbers would look like if Jay Cutler wasnt in such a giving mood when they played....

The sun was in his eyes...or whatever other "excuse" Cutlulz randomly uses. I swear that guy has more excuses than than a married hooker.

 

[G-men]

The sun was in his eyes...or whatever other "excuse" Cutlulz randomly uses. I swear that guy has more excuses than than a married hooker.

He had no cardiovascular endurance.

 

[inthecards21]

Surprised William Gay wasn't on here with a 100% burn rate. I swear I haven't seen him defend a pass in 2 years. McFadden sucks for sure, but Gay is far worse

 

[Hasselbeck]

I'm surprised the entire Houston Texans secondary wasn't on the most burned list.

 

[Rayman]

I'm surprised the entire Houston Texans secondary wasn't on the most burned list.

Jacques Reeves will always have a place in my heart.

 

[Shayn•Da•Pain]

Surprised William Gay wasn't on here with a 100% burn rate. I swear I haven't seen him defend a pass in 2 years. McFadden sucks for sure, but Gay is far worse

I just laughed and cried at the same time. :redface:

Yeah gay sucks ballzaq. I wish we would hold open tryouts to replace the guy.

The only reason why I think he's not on the list, is you need to have 50+ passes thrown in your direction to have been allowed. Nnamdi isn't on the list because he wasn't targeted enough times.

 

[steeljake]

this only confrims that mxcfadden is indeed a bum....

 

[Senser81]

Likewise, guys like Carr, Routt, and Cromartie are their team's second best CBs. Perhaps they make the list because they are covering less talented wide receivers or balls are forced their way because there is no way they're throwing at some of the league's true top CBs.

Yeah, its like using wins and losses with pitchers. Its easier to get wins if you are facing the other team's fifth starter instead of their #1 guy. Similarly, I would guess its easier to cover Kevin Walter than Andre Johnson.

I think also a team's scheme has a lot to do with it. McFadden gets isolated a lot when the Steelers free-lance on defense. It kind of reminds me of the 46 defense, when it was said that the weakness was CBs Mike Richardson and Leslie Frazier, but that scheme dictated that Richardson and Frazier would almost always be in 1-on-1 coverage.

 

[Saluki]

Damn son. Burned 70% of the time? Somebody please give that man some ssaftey help or something

 

[Shayn•Da•Pain]

Yeah, its like using wins and losses with pitchers. Its easier to get wins if you are facing the other team's fifth starter instead of their #1 guy. Similarly, I would guess its easier to cover Kevin Walter than Andre Johnson.

I think also a team's scheme has a lot to do with it. McFadden gets isolated a lot when the Steelers free-lance on defense. It kind of reminds me of the 46 defense, when it was said that the weakness was CBs Mike Richardson and Leslie Frazier, but that scheme dictated that Richardson and Frazier would almost always be in 1-on-1 coverage.

The Steelers are running the zone blitz and cover 2, 50% of the time respectively. Half the time they are giving safety help over the top, the other half of the time it's a zone blitz that allows the corners to cover a zone, not 1-on-1.

McFadden sucks ass. Ike Taylor isn't nearly as bad, and he faces the same problems, because the Steelers don't play man. The Steelers zone blitz schemes try to force teams to attack specific points of the field, by creating 'soft zones' or areas that aren't being covered by two people. Usually Polamalu will be lurking here. Otherwise the Steelers try to create zones that are covered by two-three players. So I don't know where you get this 1-on-1 crap from.

 

[Aso]

Are you saying the Steelers are never in 1 on 1 man coverage with cover 1 or 0?

 

[Shayn•Da•Pain]

Are you saying the Steelers are never in 1 on 1 man coverage with cover 1 or 0?

No. I'm saying the schemes they run are zone coverages mainly (about 50%), then 'Cover 2' (near 50%), with a small percentage of 'cover 1-0'. That's just not how they scheme it. So no, I wouldn't blame McFadden's suckyness on being a scheme 1-on-1 problem. It's a McFadden problem.

 

[Rayman]

Are you saying the Steelers are never in 1 on 1 man coverage with cover 1 or 0?

I'd be shocked if they ever do 1 or 0...just doesn't seem to fit their skillset.

Maybe once in a blue moon to throw a QB off...

 

[Aso]

I'd be shocked if they ever do 1 or 0

I have seen them a few times. I just wasn't sure if that was the regular or if that was just a few special plays I had seen.

 

[Point Blank]

 

[Shayn•Da•Pain]

He's the guy on madden with like 99 spd 99 acc 80 cth and 10 awr right?

 

[NAHSTE]

DeAngelol is the most surprising here IMO. I knew he wasn't that good, but he is outright bad![/B] 70.7% burn rate, gave up 1,055 yards and 9 TDs last year. Targetted 99 times and only defended 16 of those passes? It's even more shocking that I've seen him on a Top-10 CB list recently.

I remember my first year of watching football.