The whole point is that the NHL's position is conflicting when it comes to reducing concussions. They say they want to reduce concussions but at the same time they allow fighting which poses an unnecessary risk to the players' health. If the NHL wants to say that fighting will stay because it's entertaining side aspect of the sport, then so be it. At the same time, they should just drop the act of saying they want to protect players from concussions and head trauma. The NHL truly doesn't care about the health of their players because they aren't eliminating unnecessary risks to the sport. You can't even defend the NHL's position on protecting players without completely ignoring logic. The Olympics and many forms of amateur hockey exist without fighting. Why can't the NHL?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7079e/7079e2364c7e6bc9a509f3429fba1fa1c93d7548" alt="Eek! :o :o"
And how is it an unnecessary risk. Both people in the fight make the choice to fight. No one says they have to. If they don't want to fight, they don't drop the gloves. That is how it works. You drop the gloves, you know what you are getting into. It is the same risk anyone takes going into a fight.
What is an uncesessary risk is everything we pointed out. The equipment and not finding better ways to protect players heads, the design of the boards and glass, and hitting to the head from body checks and elbows. You know, the things that cause the vast vast majority of concussions in the league.
I am telling you guys now. If you take out fighting, hits to the head, and concussions from hits will go up. KG, wr50l, fallin, leaf, hockey people know this. If people like the Sean Avery's and Claude Lemiuex's are not kept in check they would be allowed to do whatever they want to any player. You guys don't seem to realize that.
"Take out fighting you solve 10%".
Rather it is, take out fighting, solve 10%, gain 20% in other areas.