Peyton Manning, Tom Brady, Aaron Rodgers, Philip Rivers, Matt Ryan, Ben Roethlisberger, Joe Flacco, Matt Cassel, Kyle Orton, and (last, but certainly not least) Michael Vick.
Eagles are 5-0 with. I don't understand why he's being so penalized for missing games. He played more than half the game against the Packers and damn near almost won it despite Kolb starting. With how much better the Eagles are with Vick, I can excuse the fact that he's missed 3 1/2 games.
The Giants (2nd best defense in the NFL) contained Vick this week and he still finds a way to be productive with minimal mistakes. Vick has only had one turnover all year. One. It was a lost fumble. Not even an interception. And it's not as if he's been playing conservatively.
I know some have argued "Well, Kolb wasn't that far off from Vick" as a reason as to why Vick shouldn't be MVP and I see where people are going with that (see Curtis Painter), but that should have no bearing. The Eagles are on a whole 'nother level when Vick is on the field. Is Kolb serviceable? Yes. But Vick is far above serviceable.
The only other candidate I can see beating out Vick is Rivers, who the thread seems to agree with. Brady's up there is well. Not so much Peyton this year (who was my favorite last year). The only knock I have against Rivers would be that the Chargers aren't playoff-bound at the current moment, but that'll most likely change.
The thing that stands out for me with Vick is not only the stat line (who, apparently, people think I'm going crazy over), but that he hasn't committed turnovers and that he just is the best player on the field once he steps on. I don't see any reason to doubt the Eagles are the best team in the NFC when Vick is on the field, so I don't see how this guy can't, at least, be in the running for MVP. Especially if he keeps up the season that he has.