Wacky BCS scenarios

[Senser81]

Nevermind it wouldnt actually ever prevent rematches (i was thinking of the Pac-10 & Big-10 before they expanded)

EDIT: Fuck you beat me to it. I still dont see a rematch as a horrible thing though. You honestly rather see LSU-Georgia instead of LSU-Alabama again? Im not saying you're wrong i just dont see rematches as being so bad. I would much rather see LSU-Alabama again instead of LSU-Georgia. Im sure many would too.

I think that when these conferences start expanding to be 14-team or 16-team conferences, then I think you have to have divisional play. I think the schedule would be too skewed otherwise, because you wouldn't have even conference schedules. A team could play 8 conference games, yet still miss out on playing the three toughest teams in the conference, etc.

 

[ZoneBlitz]

I think that when these conferences start expanding to be 14-team or 16-team conferences, then I think you have to have divisional play. I think the schedule would be too skewed otherwise, because you wouldn't have even conference schedules. A team could play 8 conference games, yet still miss out on playing the three toughest teams in the conference, etc.

I agree. In that case id be ok with divisions because they would be 8 teams, not 6, and there would be a lesser chance of a mediocre team winning the division.

 

[mgoblue2290]

I would love LSU and OK St to lose a game a piece and watch the pandemonium ensue. You thought Sandusky got a lot of run on sports radio???

It might be better for the argument against the BCS then having multiple undefeated teams. It shows the ultimate flaw in that losing earlier is better than losing later which makes zero sense.

D-1 college football is the most flawed organization in all of sports.

 

[LiquidLarry2GhostWF]

It might be better for the argument against the BCS then having multiple undefeated teams. It shows the ultimate flaw in that losing earlier is better than losing later which makes zero sense.

D-1 college football is the most flawed organization in all of sports.

It is flawed because of greed, my bro-friend.

 

[mgoblue2290]

It is flawed because of greed, my bro-friend.

Occupy NCAA?

 

[LiquidLarry2GhostWF]

Occupy NCAA?

They tried that at State College, Pennsylvania about a week ago. Didn't go over so well.

 

[Bear Pand]

It might be better for the argument against the BCS then having multiple undefeated teams. It shows the ultimate flaw in that losing earlier is better than losing later which makes zero sense.

D-1 college football is the most flawed organization in all of sports.

I agree but I think the real problem is the human polls, which would probably play a part in determining playoff seeds / who makes it even w/o a BCS. As far as I know the computer polls don't take into consideration when a team loses, I could be wrong though.

There's a whole bunch of unwritten rules and other bs that goes into the human polls and there should be a much bigger focus to improve them. Instead people in general just want to whine about "computers"

 

[DoubleDeuce]

In 2007, the Patriots defeated the Giants in the regular season. Then later, the Giants defeated the Patriots. The series was 1-1.

It seems like some of you guys are saying that they should play a third time, because the series is tied and proves nothing.

 

[Bomberooski]

In 2007, the Patriots defeated the Giants in the regular season. Then later, the Giants defeated the Patriots. The series was 1-1.

It seems like some of you guys are saying that they should play a third time, because the series is tied and proves nothing.

The second matchup happened due to a playoff system. Impossible to compare.

 

[ZoneBlitz]

The second matchup happened due to a playoff system. Impossible to compare.

Actually, FirstTimer was trying to make that exact point. While my idea wasnt great, neither was anything FT was saying.

 

[DoubleDeuce]

I'll admit I didn't read the whole topic, but if Alabama and LSU met up in the Championship and Alabama came away with a victory, would it really be fair to say they didn't deserve it?

 

[FirstTimer]

Actually, FirstTimer was trying to make that exact point. While my idea wasnt great, neither was anything FT was saying.

Actually, no I was not.

Again your retarded ass fucks it up.

 

[ZoneBlitz]

Actually, no I was not.

Again your retarded ass fucks it up.

If i gave enough of a fuck, i would look your posts up & quote it.

 

[Bomberooski]

Actually, FirstTimer was trying to make that exact point. While my idea wasnt great, neither was anything FT was saying.

Well duh, ZB, I thought we had all agreed that little Fightin Irishman was trolling like Brady Quinn

 

[FirstTimer]

If i gave enough of a fuck, i would look your posts up & quote it.

Go for it rimjob.

Jesus Christ. 16 fucking pages into this and you're still being a fucktard. Comparing two NFL teams meeting due to a playoff set up is not the same thing as dictating a rematch of a game we have already seen by some what or wholly subjective means.

You are an absolute scourge to intelligence on this site.

 

[Bomberooski]

I'll admit I didn't read the whole topic, but if Alabama and LSU met up in the Championship and Alabama came away with a victory, would it really be fair to say they didn't deserve it?

Yes, because Georgia with the same record in conference hasn't had a shot at LSU yet (whether or not you think they are better than Bama on paper).

 

[ZoneBlitz]

Go for it rimjob.

Jesus Christ. 15 fucking pages into this and you're still being a fucktard. Comparing two NFL teams meeting due to a playoff set up is not the same thing as dictating a rematch of a game we have already seen.

You are an absolute scourge to intelligence on this site.

You mad?

 

[FirstTimer]

You mad?

I don't get mad.

I fuck with profiles.

:smug:

 

[ZoneBlitz]

I don't get mad.

I fuck with profiles.

:smug:

Oh no!! :champ:

 

[FirstTimer]

Since when is your faggot self a mod?