Enough is enough. Peyton Manning is the greatest QB of all time.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Aso
    The Serious House
    • Nov 2008
    • 11137

    It is hard not to blame Peyton when you see the ENTIRE O-line all take their first step at the same damn time. They were all perfectly in-sync on what would've most likely been a run play it looked like.

    Comment

    • jms493
      Junior Member
      • Feb 2009
      • 11248

      sorry...but this is still valid

      Comment

      • Hasselbeck
        Jus' bout dat action boss
        • Feb 2009
        • 6175

        Originally posted by ram29jackson
        yes, all those problems complications and failures and he still threw for 280. You cant pad the stats unless you actually do it.
        Got it.. so if you lose by 35 in a Super Bowl it's all good if you can pad them stats in the process.

        Originally posted by ram29jackson
        I already said months ago that Seattle wasn't winning any SB

        Comment

        • ram29jackson
          Noob
          • Nov 2008
          • 0

          Originally posted by Hasselbeck
          Got it.. so if you lose by 35 in a Super Bowl it's all good if you can pad them stats in the process.

          yes, because only the greatest QB of all time is capable of that

          Comment

          • ram29jackson
            Noob
            • Nov 2008
            • 0

            just putting this here because I saw it and liked it

            Attached Files

            Comment

            • ram29jackson
              Noob
              • Nov 2008
              • 0

              The Following User Says No Thank You to ram29jackson For This un-Useful Post:
              Maynard
              LOL what a dumbfuck you are. That Montana picture synopsizes your entire argument and yet you groan me for it ?.....forget you, you are just a complete childish idiot.
              Last edited by ram29jackson; 02-04-2014, 04:26 PM.

              Comment

              • ram29jackson
                Noob
                • Nov 2008
                • 0

                Comment

                • spursup
                  Noob
                  • Dec 2013
                  • 505

                  Originally posted by bucky
                  McCarthy gives Rodgers 2.5 seconds to get the ball out. Manning had two ints with his team down 29-0 in the first half or early in the second. Manning contributed to the loss. The entire team caused the loss, but Manning contributed to it. You're sounding as bad as Bill trying to defend Favre. Manning did NOT have a good game.

                  I didn't think Manning was GOAT before the game. I would have picked two other QB's before him. And the game did nothing to change my mind. I'm OK with someone else believing Manning is GOAT. He has a tremendous resume. But I would pick Unitas and Montana before Manning.
                  There's a difference between calling a play to take 2.5 seconds and calling a play that is supposed to take 4 or 5 seconds and only having 2.5. Manning didn't have open receivers yet constant pressure in his face. The checkdowns were all he had when he had to get rid of the ball.

                  Comment

                  • bucky
                    #50? WTF?
                    • Feb 2009
                    • 5408

                    Originally posted by baseballchampion
                    There's a difference between calling a play to take 2.5 seconds and calling a play that is supposed to take 4 or 5 seconds and only having 2.5. Manning didn't have open receivers yet constant pressure in his face. The checkdowns were all he had when he had to get rid of the ball.
                    So Manning should have audibled to different plays that only take 2.5 seconds. That's what Rodgers has to do. Hell, Rodgers is expected to get rid of the ball in less than 2.5 seconds. That's how they practice. Hell, McCarthy has a horn that blows after 2.5 seconds in practice and the ball had better be out of Rodgers hands. If Manning is running plays that take 4/5 seconds when he knows he has less than 3, that doesn't support your argument. You're sounding like a blind Manning homer.

                    I was a Manning fan before Peyton even started college. Archie was my second favorite QB behind Bart Starr back in the 60's early 70's. I felt really bad for Archie being on such putrid Saints teams. When his kids started playing QB, I was instant fans of theirs. I'm just not some blind Manning homer. Top 5 QB all time, yes. Top 3 QB all time, very likely. GOAT, I don't believe so. And he did not have a good SB performance on Sunday.

                    Comment

                    • ram29jackson
                      Noob
                      • Nov 2008
                      • 0

                      Originally posted by bucky
                      So Manning should have audibled to different plays that only take 2.5 seconds. That's what Rodgers has to do. Hell, Rodgers is expected to get rid of the ball in less than 2.5 seconds. That's how they practice. Hell, McCarthy has a horn that blows after 2.5 seconds in practice and the ball had better be out of Rodgers hands. If Manning is running plays that take 4/5 seconds when he knows he has less than 3, that doesn't support your argument. You're sounding like a blind Manning homer.

                      I was a Manning fan before Peyton even started college. Archie was my second favorite QB behind Bart Starr back in the 60's early 70's. I felt really bad for Archie being on such putrid Saints teams. When his kids started playing QB, I was instant fans of theirs. I'm just not some blind Manning homer. Top 5 QB all time, yes. Top 3 QB all time, very likely. GOAT, I don't believe so. And he did not have a good SB performance on Sunday.
                      great , didn't help Rodgers much in the playoffs though...lol just saying,its neither here nor there

                      Comment

                      • spursup
                        Noob
                        • Dec 2013
                        • 505

                        Originally posted by bucky
                        So Manning should have audibled to different plays that only take 2.5 seconds. That's what Rodgers has to do. Hell, Rodgers is expected to get rid of the ball in less than 2.5 seconds. That's how they practice. Hell, McCarthy has a horn that blows after 2.5 seconds in practice and the ball had better be out of Rodgers hands. If Manning is running plays that take 4/5 seconds when he knows he has less than 3, that doesn't support your argument. You're sounding like a blind Manning homer.

                        I was a Manning fan before Peyton even started college. Archie was my second favorite QB behind Bart Starr back in the 60's early 70's. I felt really bad for Archie being on such putrid Saints teams. When his kids started playing QB, I was instant fans of theirs. I'm just not some blind Manning homer. Top 5 QB all time, yes. Top 3 QB all time, very likely. GOAT, I don't believe so. And he did not have a good SB performance on Sunday.
                        Let me go back to what I originally said. I said Manning had a good game, not a great game, not a bad game, just good. He threw for 280 yards while under constant pressure and having had possessions taken away. Drives just weren't finished, touchdowns weren't scored, playcalls were terrible, defense didn't do anything to stop the Seahawks.

                        Comment

                        • Hasselbeck
                          Jus' bout dat action boss
                          • Feb 2009
                          • 6175

                          Originally posted by baseballchampion
                          Let me go back to what I originally said. I said Manning had a good game, not a great game, not a bad game, just good. He threw for 280 yards while under constant pressure and having had possessions taken away. Drives just weren't finished, touchdowns weren't scored, playcalls were terrible, defense didn't do anything to stop the Seahawks.


                          Fantasy Football has ruined people's idea of what is a good and bad game. Over 60% of his stats came when Denver was down 29-36 points. Peyton also got away with ANOTHER pick 6 before half on 4th and 2 (Thurmond fell down), and a pass that would have been picked off by Sherman had Demaryius not interfered.

                          Again.. the Super Bowl loss does not take away from what Peyton did this season or his entire career. He's a Top 3 QB all-time (I personally feel the order is Montana, Manning, Elway) .. but he did NOT play well on Sunday. That's not insulting Peyton.. it's telling the truth.
                          Originally posted by ram29jackson
                          I already said months ago that Seattle wasn't winning any SB

                          Comment

                          • ram29jackson
                            Noob
                            • Nov 2008
                            • 0

                            Originally posted by Hasselbeck


                            Fantasy Football has ruined people's idea of what is a good and bad game. Over 60% of his stats came when Denver was down 29-36 points. Peyton also got away with ANOTHER pick 6 before half on 4th and 2 (Thurmond fell down), and a pass that would have been picked off by Sherman had Demaryius not interfered.

                            Again.. the Super Bowl loss does not take away from what Peyton did this season or his entire career. He's a Top 3 QB all-time (I personally feel the order is Montana, Manning, Elway) .. but he did NOT play well on Sunday. That's not insulting Peyton.. it's telling the truth.

                            Elway before Brady ?

                            Comment

                            • spursup
                              Noob
                              • Dec 2013
                              • 505

                              Originally posted by Hasselbeck


                              Fantasy Football has ruined people's idea of what is a good and bad game. Over 60% of his stats came when Denver was down 29-36 points. Peyton also got away with ANOTHER pick 6 before half on 4th and 2 (Thurmond fell down), and a pass that would have been picked off by Sherman had Demaryius not interfered.

                              Again.. the Super Bowl loss does not take away from what Peyton did this season or his entire career. He's a Top 3 QB all-time (I personally feel the order is Montana, Manning, Elway) .. but he did NOT play well on Sunday. That's not insulting Peyton.. it's telling the truth.
                              I don't play fantasy football, and you act as if the Seahawks don't do half the stuff they get away with. There were some pretty obvious missed calls against Seattle.

                              Comment

                              • bucky
                                #50? WTF?
                                • Feb 2009
                                • 5408

                                Originally posted by baseballchampion
                                Let me go back to what I originally said. I said Manning had a good game, not a great game, not a bad game, just good. He threw for 280 yards while under constant pressure and having had possessions taken away. Drives just weren't finished, touchdowns weren't scored, playcalls were terrible, defense didn't do anything to stop the Seahawks.
                                Even on good days, Rodgers is always under pressure. 280 yards does not mean a "good day". 40ish QB rating? 2 ints before halftime while his team goes down by 29 and he goes scoreless. That doesn't equal "good day". We just disagree.

                                Comment

                                Working...