Enough is enough. Peyton Manning is the greatest QB of all time.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Esjay
    Luck2Hilton
    • Feb 2009
    • 2328

    #76
    I'm so tired of the rings/playoffs argument. First of all, the Colts teams for the past 12 years would have never made the playoffs without Manning. We almost always had one of the worst run defenses in the NFL, a huge flaw. Manning has overcome this numerous times, but against great teams in the playoffs you will eventually lose if the rest of the team is not up to par.

    This guy is so good I am literally shocked when he throws an incompletion. As a Colts fan I've been so spoiled by him that I expect a score every possession. Touchdown. It's insane. None of the receivers would have been this good without Manning. Marvin would have been great no matter where he played obviously, but I think the rest would see a significant drop in their numbers. Manning makes everyone better on the team.

    Comment

    • Houston
      Back home
      • Oct 2008
      • 21231

      #77
      Originally posted by Esjay
      Manning makes everyone better on the team.
      That's what I've been saying, put Tom Brady on a average team with a average O-line and he would do nothing.

      Comment

      • FedEx227
        Delivers
        • Mar 2009
        • 10454

        #78
        The only sport where I really think the rings argument applies is the NBA, because you're 1 of 5 and superstars have the ball in their hands for a majority of the game.

        Again, though... a guy like Jordan basically stopped a group of HoF players from even sniffing a ring (Malone, Stockton, Payton, Barkley, Miller) so....

        I think it works in some ways in the NFL, but I don't think it should be a negative. if you have the numbers over a long period of time and some decent success, it should not matter if you have 1 SB ring or 4.
        VoicesofWrestling.com

        Comment

        • killgod
          OHHHH WHEN THE REDSSSSS
          • Oct 2008
          • 4714

          #79
          Originally posted by Esjay
          I'm so tired of the rings/playoffs argument. First of all, the Colts teams for the past 12 years would have never made the playoffs without Manning. We almost always had one of the worst run defenses in the NFL, a huge flaw. Manning has overcome this numerous times, but against great teams in the playoffs you will eventually lose if the rest of the team is not up to par.

          This guy is so good I am literally shocked when he throws an incompletion. As a Colts fan I've been so spoiled by him that I expect a score every possession. Touchdown. It's insane. None of the receivers would have been this good without Manning. Marvin would have been great no matter where he played obviously, but I think the rest would see a significant drop in their numbers. Manning makes everyone better on the team.

          How can you reasonably debate the topic at hand after gargling Mannings cock like you did just there?


          Reggie Wayne, Dallas Clark, shit without Manning.

          Worst run defences, the same run defence that dominated their way to a superbowl title.

          Shocking to see this guy miss a pass.


          GTFO.





          Anyways,

          Measuring QB's by rings isn't right. But completely ignoring their BIG GAME performance is wrong. Mannings play in BIG GAMES is not up to GOAT standards. Not matter how you slice it.

          *awaits some dumb Indy homer to scream otherwise, then bring Brady into it because I'm a Pats fan despite me not even including him in this discussion because he doesn't deserve to be*
          Last edited by killgod; 10-13-2009, 12:12 PM.

          Comment

          • FedEx227
            Delivers
            • Mar 2009
            • 10454

            #80
            Originally posted by killgod
            Anyways,

            Measuring QB's by rings isn't right. But completely ignoring their BIG GAME performance is wrong. Mannings play in BIG GAMES is not up to GOAT standards. Not matter how you slice it.

            *awaits some dumb Indy homer to scream otherwise, then bring Brady into it because I'm a Pats fan despite me not even including him in this discussion because he doesn't deserve to be*
            I can dig that.

            Luckily Peyton still has some more time to set his mark, so we'll have to wait and see but I definitely feel big games/playoff game results > rings.
            VoicesofWrestling.com

            Comment

            • Esjay
              Luck2Hilton
              • Feb 2009
              • 2328

              #81
              Originally posted by killgod
              How can you reasonably debate the topic at hand after gargling Mannings cock like you did just there?


              Reggie Wayne, Dallas Clark, shit without Manning.

              Worst run defences, the same run defence that dominated their way to a superbowl title.

              Shocking to see this guy miss a pass.


              GTFO.





              Anyways,

              Measuring QB's by rings isn't right. But completely ignoring their BIG GAME performance is wrong. Mannings play in BIG GAMES is not up to GOAT standards. Not matter how you slice it.

              *awaits some dumb Indy homer to scream otherwise, then bring Brady into it because I'm a Pats fan despite me not even including him in this discussion because he doesn't deserve to be*
              You really think Reggie Wayne and Dallas Clark would put up the same numbers without Manning? If you don't you're blind. I'm not being a homer, it's the truth. I know it sounds ridiculous but that's how good he is.

              Yeah the run D was very good in the playoffs but they were so bad in the regular season it was a miracle we won any games. The only reason we did was because of Peyton.

              Comment

              • Houston
                Back home
                • Oct 2008
                • 21231

                #82
                Originally posted by killgod


                Reggie Wayne, Dallas Clark, shit without Manning.


                GTFO.
                Pretty sure he said less, not shit....

                Comment

                • killgod
                  OHHHH WHEN THE REDSSSSS
                  • Oct 2008
                  • 4714

                  #83
                  Originally posted by Esjay
                  You really think Reggie Wayne and Dallas Clark would put up the same numbers without Manning? If you don't you're blind. I'm not being a homer, it's the truth. I know it sounds ridiculous but that's how good he is.

                  Yeah the run D was very good in the playoffs but they were so bad in the regular season it was a miracle we won any games. The only reason we did was because of Peyton.
                  Reggie Wayne and Dallas Clark would have success with any legit QB. That's ridiculous to suggest otherwise. Wayne was a STAR @ Miami. Holds records and shit.

                  The only reason you won was because of Peyton? Give me a fucking break homer. You won DESPITE Peyton half the time and he received an undeserved SB MVP if you ask me. Rhodes got fucking ripped off.

                  Did you even watch the same playoffs everyone else did?

                  He had 3 INT's vs the Chiefs
                  2 INT's vs the Ravens AND couldn't find the endzone. (Thankfully the D came through)

                  He played well vs New England, despite contributing to the massive hole they found themselves in at halftime

                  His SB performance was average. His only TD coming from a blown coverage leaving Wayne open by a mile.


                  CMONNNNNNNN MAN!

                  Originally posted by HoustonBoy
                  Pretty sure he said less, not shit....
                  I was overexaggerating to emphasize my point. Thanks for catching on you dumb fucking kid.

                  Comment

                  • Esjay
                    Luck2Hilton
                    • Feb 2009
                    • 2328

                    #84
                    Originally posted by killgod
                    Reggie Wayne and Dallas Clark would have success with any legit QB. That's ridiculous to suggest otherwise. Wayne was a STAR @ Miami. Holds records and shit.

                    The only reason you won was because of Peyton? Give me a fucking break homer. You won DESPITE Peyton half the time and he received an undeserved SB MVP if you ask me. Rhodes got fucking ripped off.

                    Did you even watch the same playoffs everyone else did?

                    He had 3 INT's vs the Chiefs
                    2 INT's vs the Ravens AND couldn't find the endzone. (Thankfully the D came through)

                    He played well vs New England, despite contributing to the massive hole they found themselves in at halftime

                    His SB performance was average. His only TD coming from a blown coverage leaving Wayne open by a mile.


                    CMONNNNNNNN MAN!



                    I was overexaggerating to emphasize my point. Thanks for catching on you dumb fucking kid.
                    Hey idiot, I was referring to the regular season when I said he was the only reason we won. We had ZERO run defense for 16 games and wouldn't have MADE the playoffs without Manning. What part of that is so hard for you to understand?

                    Comment

                    • killgod
                      OHHHH WHEN THE REDSSSSS
                      • Oct 2008
                      • 4714

                      #85
                      Originally posted by Esjay
                      Hey idiot, I was referring to the regular season when I said he was the only reason we won. We had ZERO run defense for 16 games and wouldn't have MADE the playoffs without Manning. What part of that is so hard for you to understand?
                      Why is it so hard for you to understand my reasoning for Peyton NOT TO BE the GOAT is because of his BIG GAME play?


                      God damn son.

                      Comment

                      • killgod
                        OHHHH WHEN THE REDSSSSS
                        • Oct 2008
                        • 4714

                        #86
                        Originally posted by Lefty34
                        Yeah, because the sample size of 15 playoff games tells us so much more than the 181 games he's played as a whole
                        I love how quickly you Manning homers are to disregard the BIG GAMES of his career because his play wasn't up to his regular season standings.


                        Manning is the GOAT cause he can thrash the previously weak AFC South year in and year out, but when it comes to the playoff.....wait no....playoffs don't mean anything cause it's a team game and cause of weak defence and cause of you being a Patriots fan and blah blah (subsequently this all doesn't apply in the regular season tho? no?)


                        Give me a fucking break you jokers.


                        You disregard the playoffs because he's never been as good in the playoffs as the regular season. You won't admit it though. If Manning was boss in the playoffs, you'd be all over how great his play in big games is......you'd be lying if you say you wouldn't.
                        Last edited by killgod; 10-13-2009, 12:43 PM.

                        Comment

                        • Houston
                          Back home
                          • Oct 2008
                          • 21231

                          #87
                          Originally posted by killgod
                          I love how quickly you Manning homers are to disregard the BIG GAMES of his career because his play wasn't up to his regular season standings.


                          Manning is the GOAT cause he can thrash the previously weak AFC South year in and year out, but when it comes to the playoff.....wait no....playoffs don't mean anything cause it's a team game and cause of weak defence and cause of you being a Patriots fan and blah blah (subsequently this all doesn't apply in the regular season tho? no?)


                          Give me a fucking break you jokers.


                          You disregard the playoffs because he's never been as good in the playoffs as the regular season. You won't admit it though. If Manning was boss in the playoffs, you'd be all over how great his play in big games is......you'd be lying if you say you wouldn't.

                          Comment

                          • Archer
                            Go the fuck outside
                            • Oct 2008
                            • 15303

                            #88
                            Originally posted by killgod
                            I love how quickly you Manning homers are to disregard the BIG GAMES of his career because his play wasn't up to his regular season standings.


                            Manning is the GOAT cause he can thrash the previously weak AFC South year in and year out, but when it comes to the playoff.....wait no....playoffs don't mean anything cause it's a team game and cause of weak defence and cause of you being a Patriots fan and blah blah (subsequently this all doesn't apply in the regular season tho? no?)


                            Give me a fucking break you jokers.


                            You disregard the playoffs because he's never been as good in the playoffs as the regular season. You won't admit it though. If Manning was boss in the playoffs, you'd be all over how great his play in big games is......you'd be lying if you say you wouldn't.
                            We play the south 6 out of 16 games in the regular season . You're saying he only has 6 good games per season? LOL .

                            Comment

                            • Houston
                              Back home
                              • Oct 2008
                              • 21231

                              #89
                              Originally posted by Lefty34
                              Please, you want to discredit his GOAT status based on 15 specific games out of the 181 games he has played in. Again: child, please.
                              I'm with this cat.

                              Comment

                              • MrBill
                                Billy Brewer Sucks Penis
                                • Feb 2009
                                • 0

                                #90
                                Originally posted by Lefty34
                                Please, you want to discredit his GOAT status based on 15 specific games out of the 181 games he has played in. Again: child, please.
                                It's the exact same way with Favre. A handful of games over his entire career are what the haters hang on to make out like he doesn't even belong in the GOAT discussion.

                                Comment

                                Working...