This thread has been full of dumbassery from all sides.
NFL's Top 100 Discussion
Collapse
X
-
Hey Blick, when you were trying to convince me that Larry Johnson was a better player than Steven Jackson two years ago, how come the "younger and far more physically gifted" argument didn't come into play?Comment
-
Actually, I think its one-sided.
Special Ed: Josh Freeman is a top 100 player...look at what he's done compared to other 2nd year QBs!
Boy Genius: By that logic, Mike Williams is a top 100 player because look at what he's done compared to other rookie WRs.
Special Ed: Huh? That wouldn't make sense because they play different positions!
Again, you are making this too difficult and you are getting tangled in your own web of idiocy.Comment
-
Who the fuck cares about two years ago? I don't even remember thatComment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
Just gonna post this again to give these dickhead statements the shine they deserve. Obvious that Senser is simply an idiot in regards to this subject or he is trolling like always. May be a mix of both with how far off the highlighted statements he made is.
I don't think anybody is saying the guy is a pile of shit. But he's a young player, protected by a conservative gameplan, who has one decent season and one HORRENDOUS season under his belt. Forgive us if we would like more of a resume before we fall over ourselves gushing over him. I never came away particulary impressed with the "eye test" when watching him.
He's only thrown for over 300 yards once in his career, and that time he also threw 5 INTs. Tampa seemed to dumb down their offense for Freeman. He averaged 32 att/game his rookie year. Last year, he averaged less than 30 att/game. Tampa made a concerted effort to "hide" Freeman, and it worked. When he had to carry the team with his arm, he couldn't do it. He benefited from a weak schedule and a pretty good defense. In fact, Tampa's defense outranked their offense last season.
And I love how Freeman gets all of the credit for the Bucs sudden improvement, when two additions to the offense (Williams & Blount) were arguably the most impactful. They weren't there in '09, but Freeman was. Where was this Freeman magic wand two years ago?
Its like saying, Isaac Bruce spearheaded the greatest show on turf, ignoring that they added Faulk, Warner, and Holt.
What kind of impact did the QB (the same guy) make in 2009 without those guys?
Seems like the QB's impact was directly related to the additions of those two players.
What changed? Williams for Antonio Bryant, Blount for C.Williams. the QB didn't change, you geek. He improved, sure, but that had a lot to do with the arrrival of those two skill guys. Freeman didn't single handedly change the Bucs. Its a myth.
Get your ass on. I didnt have shit to do with this thread taking the direction it did.
Comment
-
Cute. Thank the Bucs getting shafted in that game for Rodgers getting a ring. Freeman even giving Rodgers titles and he doesnt even know how the GOD blessed him. You should be Freeman.
Comment
-
So now he has the most impact on two teams. You were stretching with the impact on the Bucs alone.Comment
Comment