The OFFICIAL Andrew Luck Sweepstakes Thread
Collapse
X
-
the colts are a joke. its one thing to lose manning and all he brings to the table. but he doesnt play defense. that team has totally given up and isnt even trying now.
i hope luck stays for his senior season just to spite the colts.
it will be interesting if the rams get the #1....would they draft him or trade the pick?Comment
-
the colts are a joke. its one thing to lose manning and all he brings to the table. but he doesnt play defense. that team has totally given up and isnt even trying now.
i hope luck stays for his senior season just to spite the colts.
it will be interesting if the rams get the #1....would they draft him or trade the pick?
Still say the Dolphins are the front-runners, no matter how bad the Colts looked tonight. You had to see this massacre coming, maybe not 62 points bad, but a massacre nonetheless.
I'd table it:
- Dolphins (Even)
- Colts (2 to 1)
- Rams (4 to 1)
- Jaguars (10 to 1)
- Cardinals (15 to 1)
- Seahawks (15 to 1)
- Field (20 to 1)Originally posted by ram29jacksonI already said months ago that Seattle wasn't winning any SBComment
-
the colts are a joke. its one thing to lose manning and all he brings to the table. but he doesnt play defense. that team has totally given up and isnt even trying now.
i hope luck stays for his senior season just to spite the colts.
it will be interesting if the rams get the #1....would they draft him or trade the pick?Finally back after a 3 year hiatus!Comment
-
Luck has two years of eligibility left but he will graduate in the spring. He'll be in the April draft.
Would be interesting to see what St. Louis could get if they finish #1.
Cleveland was able to get this package for #6 last year:
1st Round (27 overall)
2nd Round
4th Round
Future 1st Round
Future 4th Round
In 2004, San Diego moved the #1 pick to NY for 1st & 3rd rounders plus future 1st & 5th rounders.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ram29jacksonI already said months ago that Seattle wasn't winning any SBComment
-
if the rams finish bad enough to get the #1...with a healthy bradford...then u would have to assume Bradford played like shit. Making him a potential trade rather than the #1 pick. we know bradford is the future, but if they end up with just 1 or 2 wins then that could change very fast
who would you rather have...bradford or luck?Comment
-
if the rams finish bad enough to get the #1...with a healthy bradford...then u would have to assume Bradford played like shit. Making him a potential trade rather than the #1 pick. we know bradford is the future, but if they end up with just 1 or 2 wins then that could change very fast
who would you rather have...bradford or luck?
theres more math to it, but, typically speaking its the signing bonus divided by years left, which is why teams frontload signing bonuses so much to guys they dont expect to cut - softer cap hit if the years themselves are cheap. the rams would take like a 30 million hit or some shit by trading Bradford.First of all, if the Rams get the #1, there is no chance they would take Luck. Let's get that out of the way. I understand that the general sports climate in 2011 is an impatient one, but for fucks sake, Sam Bradford has had 21 starts. This team is not starting over at the position, it's absurd to even consider it.Comment
-
if the rams finish bad enough to get the #1...with a healthy bradford...then u would have to assume Bradford played like shit. Making him a potential trade rather than the #1 pick. we know bradford is the future, but if they end up with just 1 or 2 wins then that could change very fast
who would you rather have...bradford or luck?
Comment
-
Comment