The OFFICIAL Andrew Luck Sweepstakes Thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Realist
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2009
    • 6057

    Originally posted by Houstonboi
    The Colts gonna beat The Saints, I can feel it.
    It's just gas

    Comment

    • Maynard
      stupid ass titles
      • Feb 2009
      • 17876

      the colts are a joke. its one thing to lose manning and all he brings to the table. but he doesnt play defense. that team has totally given up and isnt even trying now.

      i hope luck stays for his senior season just to spite the colts.

      it will be interesting if the rams get the #1....would they draft him or trade the pick?

      Comment

      • Hasselbeck
        Jus' bout dat action boss
        • Feb 2009
        • 6175

        Originally posted by Maynard
        the colts are a joke. its one thing to lose manning and all he brings to the table. but he doesnt play defense. that team has totally given up and isnt even trying now.

        i hope luck stays for his senior season just to spite the colts.

        it will be interesting if the rams get the #1....would they draft him or trade the pick?
        No question they would trade the pick and get a kings ransom in return. In fact, if I'm a Rams fan.. I hope I get the #1 pick this year because you can build a whole team from what it'd take to get Andrew Luck's rights.

        Still say the Dolphins are the front-runners, no matter how bad the Colts looked tonight. You had to see this massacre coming, maybe not 62 points bad, but a massacre nonetheless.

        I'd table it:
        - Dolphins (Even)
        - Colts (2 to 1)
        - Rams (4 to 1)
        - Jaguars (10 to 1)
        - Cardinals (15 to 1)
        - Seahawks (15 to 1)
        - Field (20 to 1)
        Originally posted by ram29jackson
        I already said months ago that Seattle wasn't winning any SB

        Comment

        • Awesometrax
          Noob
          • Feb 2009
          • 608

          Originally posted by Maynard
          the colts are a joke. its one thing to lose manning and all he brings to the table. but he doesnt play defense. that team has totally given up and isnt even trying now.

          i hope luck stays for his senior season just to spite the colts.

          it will be interesting if the rams get the #1....would they draft him or trade the pick?
          Luck is in his senior season fyi.
          Finally back after a 3 year hiatus!

          Comment

          • EmpireWF
            Giants in the Super Bowl
            • Mar 2009
            • 24082

            Luck has two years of eligibility left but he will graduate in the spring. He'll be in the April draft.

            Would be interesting to see what St. Louis could get if they finish #1.

            Cleveland was able to get this package for #6 last year:

            1st Round (27 overall)
            2nd Round
            4th Round
            Future 1st Round
            Future 4th Round

            In 2004, San Diego moved the #1 pick to NY for 1st & 3rd rounders plus future 1st & 5th rounders.


            Comment

            • Sharkweather
              Senior Member
              • Jul 2009
              • 8906

              Originally posted by Awesometrax
              Luck is in his senior season fyi.
              RS Junior.

              Comment

              • Hasselbeck
                Jus' bout dat action boss
                • Feb 2009
                • 6175

                Originally posted by EmpireWF
                Luck has two years of eligibility left but he will graduate in the spring. He'll be in the April draft.

                Would be interesting to see what St. Louis could get if they finish #1.
                Arab money
                Originally posted by ram29jackson
                I already said months ago that Seattle wasn't winning any SB

                Comment

                • Maynard
                  stupid ass titles
                  • Feb 2009
                  • 17876

                  if the rams finish bad enough to get the #1...with a healthy bradford...then u would have to assume Bradford played like shit. Making him a potential trade rather than the #1 pick. we know bradford is the future, but if they end up with just 1 or 2 wins then that could change very fast

                  who would you rather have...bradford or luck?

                  Comment

                  • Sharkweather
                    Senior Member
                    • Jul 2009
                    • 8906

                    Originally posted by Maynard
                    if the rams finish bad enough to get the #1...with a healthy bradford...then u would have to assume Bradford played like shit. Making him a potential trade rather than the #1 pick. we know bradford is the future, but if they end up with just 1 or 2 wins then that could change very fast

                    who would you rather have...bradford or luck?
                    Should probably give this thread a look, http://www.virtualsportsdaily.com/fo...d.php?t=110101

                    Originally posted by Diivox
                    theres more math to it, but, typically speaking its the signing bonus divided by years left, which is why teams frontload signing bonuses so much to guys they dont expect to cut - softer cap hit if the years themselves are cheap. the rams would take like a 30 million hit or some shit by trading Bradford.
                    Originally posted by Warner2BruceTD
                    First of all, if the Rams get the #1, there is no chance they would take Luck. Let's get that out of the way. I understand that the general sports climate in 2011 is an impatient one, but for fucks sake, Sam Bradford has had 21 starts. This team is not starting over at the position, it's absurd to even consider it.

                    Comment

                    • EmpireWF
                      Giants in the Super Bowl
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 24082

                      Originally posted by Maynard
                      if the rams finish bad enough to get the #1...with a healthy bradford...then u would have to assume Bradford played like shit. Making him a potential trade rather than the #1 pick. we know bradford is the future, but if they end up with just 1 or 2 wins then that could change very fast

                      who would you rather have...bradford or luck?
                      Trade Bradford, they eat at least $30 mil.


                      Comment

                      • Maynard
                        stupid ass titles
                        • Feb 2009
                        • 17876

                        didnt think about that

                        Comment

                        • NAHSTE
                          Probably owns the site
                          • Feb 2009
                          • 22233

                          Originally posted by Maynard
                          if the rams finish bad enough to get the #1...with a healthy bradford...then u would have to assume Bradford played like shit.
                          Stop.

                          Comment

                          • NAHSTE
                            Probably owns the site
                            • Feb 2009
                            • 22233

                            Originally posted by Maynard
                            didnt think about that
                            Clearly.

                            Comment

                            • Houston
                              Back home
                              • Oct 2008
                              • 21231

                              Comment

                              • Exasperate
                                LUCK 2 GARCON
                                • Oct 2011
                                • 17

                                8 GAMES CLOSER!

                                Comment

                                Working...