Oh, so you would say a 54.9% completion percentage, 24 TDs and 16 INTs is "lighting it up" (those are Cunningham's best numbers from 1986-1990)?
And as a matter of fact, Cunningham's CAREER completion percentage is 56.6% (compared to Vick's 53.8%), his average TD's per season is 12.9 (compared to Vick's 11.8), his average INT's per season is 8.4 (compared to Vick's 8.6), and his average sacks per season is 30.3 (compared to Vick's 31.1). These two players are practically mirror images of each other in the passing game.
But yet, according to you, Cunningham was "lighting it up", but Vick "cannot throw".
Also, how is it fair to label a young Cris Carter a below average weapon for Cunningham, but say a young Roddy White and Michael Jenkins were good weapons for Vick? It is quite clear that all three of these receivers needed time in the league to develop.