lol Darrelle Revis Hangs Up on Mike Francesa

[Rayman]

Sounds like Larry Brooks vs. John Tortorella to me

John Tortorella news conference - YouTube

John Tortorella vs. Brooksie - April 15th 2011 (HD) - YouTube

Rangers Coach, Reporter Drop The Verbal Gloves - YouTube

Though Brooks is a tool, and I love these exchanges from Tortorella.

Highlight of Ranger postgame.

Every.

Time.

 

[Maynard]

Marshall tripped into him, I wouldn't call the PI.

agreed. gruden immediately called it PI, but then when you see the replay you see that marshall stumbled into reves. I didnt think it was PI at all

was a bitch move to hang up though.

 

[Warner2BruceTD]

Marshall tripping/stumbling is irrelevant. Revis still grabs his jersey and pushes him out of the way. You can't do that.

What's funny, is in the interview, Revis even says "I pushed him out of the way". No shit dummy, that's why it's pass interference.

 

[1ke]

I thought Mrashall did pretty damn well against him. I was impressed. Much more impressive than Revis vs Francesca.

 

[Tailback U]

Marshall tripping/stumbling is irrelevant. Revis still grabs his jersey and pushes him out of the way. You can't do that.

What's funny, is in the interview, Revis even says "I pushed him out of the way". No shit dummy, that's why it's pass interference.

I have no problem with the no call. Marshall made it clear that he was going to physically challenge Revis and Revis more than stepped up to the challenge.

On the play, Marshall ran a terrible route, stumbling and damn near falling into Revis. Revis did get a handful of jersey and basically tossed Marshall aside because that idiot was about to fall into Revis anyway.

Marshall initiated contact and lost his footing, the only thing Revis did wrong was grab the back of his jersey but I really don't have a problem with it considering Marshall was the one falling into Revis.

And I don't even like Revis but if a 6'5" 230lb. receiver is trying to bull rush a corner then I have no problem with a corner tossing him aside. But I played DB in HS and college so I'm a bit biased.

 

[Bmore]

the stumble and the push both made a case for no penalty or a penalty. So what ever the Refs went with, I was cool with. But Revis is still bitch made for hangin' up during a interview because he couldn't answer the tough questions.

 

[Houston]

I like this guys style.

 

[Mogriffjr]

the stumble and the push both made a case for no penalty or a penalty. So what ever the Refs went with, I was cool with. But Revis is still bitch made for hangin' up during a interview because he couldn't answer the tough questions.

Revis didn't hang up phone, the Jets PR guy did

 

[Scikotic]

Francessa hates the Jets, thats no secret. He needled Revis at the beginning trying to get him to admit it was PI, then he came back to it about 5 minutes later. Revis responded, good for him.

And no, it was not PI. Marshall initiated the contact, leaned he body into Revis and drove through him. Whether he stumbled or it was intentional, it was Marshall who initiated the contact, not DR. Revis did grab him briefly to keep his balance since a 6'4, 240 beast was running right through him, but that does not make it PI. He didn't alter his route, Brandon Marshall altered his route because he couldn't keep his balance.

Sorry, just because the TV announcers call it PI, doesn't make it PI. Some of you swallow up the opinions of announcers way too easily.

 

[EmpireWF]

They pawed at each other, then Marshall slipped and went into Revis. Since it was incidental contact/Marshall slipping up, I can understand the non-call.

No doubt he grabs Marshall's jersey, but you could see the WR almost falling into him at that point.

If you want to call PI for the jersey grab, I guess I understand that.

 

[Warner2BruceTD]

Francessa hates the Jets, thats no secret. He needled Revis at the beginning trying to get him to admit it was PI, then he came back to it about 5 minutes later. Revis responded, good for him.

And no, it was not PI. Marshall initiated the contact, leaned he body into Revis and drove through him. Whether he stumbled or it was intentional, it was Marshall who initiated the contact, not DR. Revis did grab him briefly to keep his balance since a 6'4, 240 beast was running right through him, but that does not make it PI. He didn't alter his route, Brandon Marshall altered his route because he couldn't keep his balance.

Sorry, just because the TV announcers call it PI, doesn't make it PI. Some of you swallow up the opinions of announcers way too easily.

To the first bold, it was Revis who brought it up again.

To the second bold, and to others here who are making similar arguments, it's obvious some of you don't understand the rule. It doesn't matter if Marshall stumbles or not. It doesn't matter if Revis alters the route or not. Revis grabs a handful of jersey. Technically, you're not even supposed to put your hands on the player beyond 5 yards, and Revis GRABS the player and flings him forward.

Ridiculous argument. Nice Jets logo under your avatar, btw.

 

[Mogriffjr]

NFL head of officials said the right no-call was made.

 

[Cornelius]

To the first bold, it was Revis who brought it up again.

To the second bold, and to others here who are making similar arguments, it's obvious some of you don't understand the rule. It doesn't matter if Marshall stumbles or not. It doesn't matter if Revis alters the route or not. Revis grabs a handful of jersey. Technically, you're not even supposed to put your hands on the player beyond 5 yards, and Revis GRABS the player and flings him forward.

Ridiculous argument. Nice Jets logo under your avatar, btw.

Who are you, Mike Periera? They didn't call it. Who fucking cares? Post another explanation, please.

 

[Tailback U]

To the first bold, it was Revis who brought it up again.

To the second bold, and to others here who are making similar arguments, it's obvious some of you don't understand the rule. It doesn't matter if Marshall stumbles or not. It doesn't matter if Revis alters the route or not. Revis grabs a handful of jersey. Technically, you're not even supposed to put your hands on the player beyond 5 yards, and Revis GRABS the player and flings him forward.

Ridiculous argument. Nice Jets logo under your avatar, btw.

Actually the interviewer brought it up a second time when he said, "except for that 1 play." Don't know how you think that is not bringing it up again.

 

[Scikotic]

To the first bold, it was Revis who brought it up again.

To the second bold, and to others here who are making similar arguments, it's obvious some of you don't understand the rule. It doesn't matter if Marshall stumbles or not. It doesn't matter if Revis alters the route or not. Revis grabs a handful of jersey. Technically, you're not even supposed to put your hands on the player beyond 5 yards, and Revis GRABS the player and flings him forward.

Ridiculous argument. Nice Jets logo under your avatar, btw.

I don't blame you for being uneducated on the sport of football, but I do blame you for spreading such ignorant crap on the internet. But it's ok, I'll school you a bit here, free of charge.

So at what point you do you see Revis tug and fling Marshall forward? Was it after Marshall dipped his shoulder and threw it into Revis to knock him off balance? See, I'm pretty sure you will not see Revis fling Marshall forward. However, you want to believe what you want, so please watch the video a few times over and tell yourself that enough so you can feel better about your paper-thin argument. Revis didn't even extend his hands out in the flinging motion after the contact. Yes, Revis grabbed hold of his jersey, but it's pretty clear it was not to stop him from going anywhere since he was already on Marshall like velcro, but rather it was to keep his balance so Marshall didn't mow him over. Here's the kicker....Revis was watching Moore the entire time, and knew exactly where the ball was going. Marshall was so out of control he couldn't even turn his head to find the ball. So I ask, who played the ball better?

Given Marshall's physical style and also since he got away with a pretty flagrant push off earlier in the game, I think the refs knew exactly how to call this one.

My advice....if you want to learn the game of football, I'd advise you stop listening to the ESPN announcers. That will only set you back a few years...

I like the Jets logo too :thumbsup:

/your pathetic argument

 

[Warner2BruceTD]

I don't blame you for being uneducated on the sport of football, but I do blame you for spreading such ignorant crap on the internet. But it's ok, I'll school you a bit here, free of charge.

So at what point you do you see Revis tug and fling Marshall forward? Is that perhaps after he's already stumbling forward as he lost balance? See, I'm pretty sure you will not see Revis fling Marshall forward. However, you want to believe what you want, so please watch the video a few times over and tell yourself that enough so you can feel better about your feeble argument. Revis didn't even extend his hands out in the flinging motion after the contact. Yes, Revis grabbed hold of his jersey, but it's pretty clear it was not to stop him from going anywhere since he was already on Marshall like velcro, but rather it was to keep his balance so Marshall didn't mow him over. Here's the kicker....Revis was watching Moore the entire time, and knew exactly where the ball was going. Marshall was so out of control he couldn't even turn his head to find the ball. So I ask, who played the ball better?

Given Marshall's physical style and also since he got away with a pretty flagrant push off earlier in the game, I think the refs knew exactly how to call this one.

My advice....if you want to learn the game of football, I'd advise you stop listening to the ESPN announcers. That will only set you back a few years...

I like the Jets logo too :thumbsup:

/your pathetic argument

Bold is all that matters. The rest is nonsense. It doesn't matter if Marshall is tripping or out of control, where Revis's eyes are looking, whether Marshall pushed off earlier in the game, or any of the other irrelevant nonsense in your post. You can't have your hands all over the receiver, and you certainly can't grab a handful of jersey like that.

This also occured beyond 5 yards.

You can call three penalties here...pass interference, illegal contact, or defensive holding. Take your pick.

Either you have on your Jet colored glasses, or you don't understand the rule. You can take your pick on that, too.

 

[Scikotic]

Bold is all that matters. The rest is nonsense. It doesn't matter if Marshall is tripping or out of control, where Revis's eyes are looking, whether Marshall pushed off earlier in the game, or any of the other irrelevant nonsense in your post. You can't have your hands all over the receiver, and you certainly can't grab a handful of jersey like that.

This also occured beyond 5 yards.

You can call three penalties here...pass interference, illegal contact, or defensive holding. Take your pick.

Either you have on your Jet colored glasses, or you don't understand the rule. You can take your pick on that, too.

I can break down to you the game of football frame by frame, but you still wouldn't understand it seems. It appears you have this misconception that any contact after 5 yards is always pass interference. I guess that rules out the non-calls on incidental contact that the refs haven't been calling. Don't forget that any volleying for the ball downfield is an automatic PI. Feel free to send a letter to the commissioners office. They've been getting it wrong all along.

And while you're at it, a WR has every right to plow through a defending CB who knows where the ball is without any awareness of where the pass is actually going. We'll call that on the defense as well. That is what you were getting at, correct?

You might as well argue that mixing the colors red and yellow make purple. Dope...

I don't see any logos under your name, but that must be because you're embarrassed to support a winless team after 7 weeks.

 

[Warner2BruceTD]

I can break down to you the game of football frame by frame, but you still wouldn't understand it seems. It appears you have this misconception that any contact after 5 yards is always pass interference. I guess that rules out the non-calls on incidental contact that the refs have been calling. Perhaps you should tell them they are wrong on those counts as well. Also any volleying for the ball downfield is PI, make sure if you're so sure about it that you send a letter to the commissioners office. They've been getting it wrong all along.

And while you're at it, a WR has every right to plow through a defending CB who knows where the ball is without any awareness of where the pass is actually going. We'll call that on the defense as well. That is what you were getting at, correct?

You might as well argue that mixing the colors red and yellow make purple. Dope...

Revis grabbing the jersey is not incidental contact. Again, you don't understand the rule.

Also note, that Marshall stumbles after Revis mugs him and let's go of his jersey.

I don't understand how you can keep bringing up how Marshall "plowed" into Revis (hardly), yet you keep downplaying the fact that Revis GRABBED HIS JERSEY. You can't do that.

"/your pathetic argument"

 

[Scikotic]

Also note, that Marshall stumbles after Revis mugs him and let's go of his jersey.

If you can't even get the sequence of events in the correct order, you lose. Revis mugged Marshall first? Are you blind, stupid, or in denial?


We all must have missed the flag, clearly it was thrown.


Try harder next time.

 

[EmpireWF]

It's not as black or white warner.

Marshall did bowl into him...and did so several times throughout the game although that never got called.

Did Revis impede his progress? Not sure since Marshall was already slipping up.

No pass intereference is...

(a) Incidental contact by a defender’s hands, arms, or body when both players are competing for the ball, or neither player is looking for the ball. If there is any question whether contact is incidental, the ruling shall be no interference.

also

Note 1: If there is any question whether player contact is incidental, the ruling should be no interference.

If they decided to call it, okay, I could see it. If not, fine, it's not so blatant.