The AFC South....

[FirstTimer]

Sure, as soon as you show me where I said Schaub was great.

Icecube gif......


backpedal.

 

[bcransom]

LOL at this thread. So um...Someone says Schaub is a great QB (ala Peyton Manning)

I didn't say that. I said both Schaub and Manning play in offenses that throw the ball a lot.

logically, people take issue with this

I absolutely take issue with thinking Schaub is on the level of Manning at all.

And now they backtrack and say they never said Schaub was a great QB? Classic.

I never backtracked on calling Schaub great. The fact that I said that is in proof, in my writing on page 1. We just have different definitions of the term. Like I would call Manning and Brees elite compared to Schaub's "great" who I believe will be able to repeat this kind of year as long as he stays healthy.

So you just posted a page's worth of rebuttals for the sake of posting? Sums up your career at VSN quite nicely.

For the sake of arguing and discussion, yeah. Not all people post just to get thanks and more e-popular. :laugh:

 

[bcransom]

It makes sense to everyone here...except for you.

How does it NOT make sense? I explained to you how it does.


More than a time or two. Consistent great seasons=greatness. That's the entire idea behind being "great". A player isn't "great" because he has a "great" season. He's great when he can consistently repeat those results over the course of a career.

Marcus Robinson had a great season for the Bears in 1999.

Did that make him a great player?

No. It made him a player who had a great season.

There's a HUGE difference.

It's amazing you can't see it.

"QB's who are not "great" can put up very good or great seasons."

Re-read it a couple times, you'll eventually get why that's an idiotic statement.

 

[Houston]

You're right HB, you never called him great. You said it implicitly in this exchange of posts:

Schaub had a great season

He's not a great QB

He is not a scrub

he's above average



Also you need to remember that peoples opinions of Great and Good are different. This is not a "Who's the #1 QB" thread where it's a dead given what people are saying.
There's no point of arguing over if someone is great or good. Your idea of good may be someone elses idea of great. It's a fucking opinion that's not gonna change.


Jesus get over it, stop trying to pick fights

 

[FirstTimer]

"QB's who are not "great" can put up very good or great seasons."

Re-read it a couple times, you'll eventually get why that's an idiotic statement.

Actually it's not.

I gave you an example dipshit.

Chad Pennington had a "great" season in 2002. Did that make him a "great" player?

No.

He was a good player who put together one hell of a season.

 

[Goober]

"QB's who are not "great" can put up very good or great seasons."

Re-read it a couple times, you'll eventually get why that's an idiotic statement.

Does anyone else find this post idiotic?

 

[FirstTimer]

Schaub had a great season

He's not a great QB

bcransom thinks that an idiotic statement.

 

[Houston]

You're right HB, you never called him great. You just said it implicitly in this exchange of posts:

LMAO

Ice Cube gif/ Voice of Reasoning=jokes


if I was serious about proving your wrong when you said Schaub was great, or if I was serious about agreeting with him when he said Shaub was....

I would've posted fucking words, stats, something. Not a gif and a small statement.


You're reading into this too hard.

 

[FirstTimer]

Does anyone else find this post idiotic?

*Raises hand*

It is BEYOND astounding that he can't grasp a simple concept like that.

Matt Forte had a great rookie season. Does that make him a great player?

No.

 

[FirstTimer]

I would've posted fucking words, stats, something. Not a gif and a small statement.

Don't act as if you are capable of that.

 

[Houston]

bcransom thinks that an idiotic statement.

My point exactly.

Some people think it takes 1 Great season to be considered Great. Some think it takes many.

It's the most stupid thing to argue over.

That's like me calling a kid who runs a 4.6 slow but you think he's fast so where gonna argue for hours on whats considered fast and whats considered slow.

I can see an argument on "Who's better" because you're arguing over people.

But an argument on "whats Great and whats Good"? LMAO then you're arguing over a fucking adjective.

We're not even arguing on rather or not Schaub is good or bad. We're arguing about rather he's Great or Good.
Do you not realize how retarded that is.

 

[FirstTimer]

Some people think it takes 1 Great season to be considered Great.

Retarded. Simply retarded.

 

[bcransom]

So you have to see a guy repeat to be able to admit he's great. ALRIGHT. Then I guess we have differing opinions, worst thing in the world? No.

Calm the fuck down. The type of person who has a pathological need to groan every single post of the person he's arguing with as well as include as many insults as possible in each post is a person who obviously has no life. Maybe you'll control the 3 year old inside you next time.

 

[Houston]

Retarded. Simply retarded.

And yet I never said that.

 

[Houston]

So you have to see a guy repeat to be able to admit he's great. ALRIGHT. Then I guess we have differing opinions, worst thing in the world? No.

Calm the fuck down. The type of person who has a pathological need to groan every single post of the person he's arguing with as well as include as many insults as possible in each post is a person who obviously has no life. Maybe you'll control the 3 year old inside you next time.

Exactly, arguing is one thing.

But groaning and adding insults every 5 seconds is childish.

 

[FirstTimer]

Maybe you'll control the 3 year old inside you next time.

You have that reversed. I like when the 3 year old controls me when I'm inside of it.

edobear:


PS. Make a good post and you'll get thanked.

 

[Berowsk]

Welcome back HB.

I think the Texans should bench Matt Shaub and start their superstar Dan Orlovsky.

 

[Goober]

My point exactly.

Some people think it takes 1 Great season to be considered Great. Some think it takes many.

It's the most stupid thing to argue over.

That's like me calling a kid who runs a 4.6 slow but you think he's fast so where gonna argue for hours on whats considered fast and whats considered slow.

I can see an argument on "Who's better" because you're arguing over people.

But an argument on "whats Great and whats Good"? LMAO then you're arguing over a fucking adjective.

We're not even arguing on rather or not Schaub is good or bad. We're arguing about rather he's Great or Good.
Do you not realize how retarded that is.

Good Lord.

 

[bcransom]

You have that reversed. I like when the 3 year old controls me when I'm inside of it.

edobear:


PS. Make a good post and you'll get thanked.

And that will thrill me beyond belief.

 

[Houston]

Welcome back HB.

I think the Texans should bench Matt Shaub and start their superstar Dan Orlovsky.

Or Rex Grossman?