The Metrodome Roof Has Collapsed

[dave]

Even when he makes me look like a fool, I respect FirstTimer.
I'm brighter than he is, but he's a helluva protege.

 

[FirstTimer]

I'm brighter than he is,

Ha.

You wish you crusty old fuck.

 

[MrBill]

Oh rly?

From LAST FUCKING SEASON.

Dec 28th. vs Minnesota. Kickoff 7:30

From the 2008 Bears schedule:

Dec 11th vs. New Orleans. Kickoff at 7:15

Dec 22nd vs Green Bay. Kick off at 7:30.

2007:

Dec31st vs Green Bay. Kick of at 7:30

2005:

Dec 18th vs Atlanta. Kick off at 7:30


Hell of a "rule of thumb" there.

And that's just the Bears schedule. Not going to bother looking through the other AFC/NFC East/North colder weather teams.

How about you keep trying you fucking clueless ass hat.

:smug:

Monday Night Football - 1990 to Present

Maybe you should have looked at some historical data before you started getting too full of yourself. Between 1990 and 2004, there were ZERO games scheduled on MNF in cold weather markets the last 3 weeks of the season. In 2005, the NFL scheduled 2 to end the season, Packers @ Ravens and Patriots @ Jets but both involved teams that play outdoors in cold weather markets. Then there were no more until the Bears ended the 2008 season with the Packers and 2009 season with the Vikings. The 2009 season was the first time in more than 20 years that the NFL had a dome team playing a night game outdoors in a cold weather market on MNF in the last 3 weeks of the season.

Sunday Night Football is excluded since the league allows that game to be flexed from the best matchups in week 7 and beyond each year and isn't final when the league posts the schedule each April.

So out of the 60 MNF games in the last 3 weeks of the season between 1990-2010, only 4 have been played in cold weather markets at night in the last 3 weeks of the season. I would call a 93.4% scheduling rate a rule of thumb.

 

[leaffan]

lolololol bill

You said night games. Not monday night games.

 

[MrBill]

lolololol bill

You said night games. Not monday night games.

What makes you think that the Sunday Night Football data is going to be drastically different?

 

[Senser81]

What makes you think that the Sunday Night Football data is going to be drastically different?

 

[BigHouseUSA]

Can a preacher get a facepalm?

 

[FirstTimer]

Maybe you should have looked at some historical data before you started getting too full of yourself.

....

Says the idiot that had this exchange yesterday

I guess I missed the part where Gehrig was getting driven into the turf by 300 pound men 15-20 times a game.

LOL at this.

I'd love to see this "stat" backed up.

Go check the QB hit stats on NFL.com if you want to do your own research. The Vikings were around the top 5 in hits allowed the last time I checked.

Thus showing you have done no research.

Right now the Vikings are 5th or so in the NFL at 77 QB hits...in 13 games. Which is just under 6 a game. Care to tell me where the other 9-15 per game are at that Favre was facing every week for the last 19 seasons? So far you are only off by 2,500-4,000 total hits!

Oh look! Research...by me. Again.

Your post is so full of fail it's hilarious.


STFU. You're a fucking joke.

:smug:

 

[MrBill]

....

Says the idiot that had this exchange yesterday







Thus showing you have done no research.



Oh look! Research...by me. Again.

Your post is so full of fail it's hilarious.


STFU. You're a fucking joke.

:smug:

You were just in too big of a hurry to stroke your own cock in this thread and got busted by the facts so you desperately cross post a different thread to draw attention from your fail. I was a lot more right about the average hits a QB takes in a game than you were about the frequency of cold weather night games

The fail is all yours dickhead.

 

[bucky]

The fail is all yours dickhead.

You both fail. Bart Starr > Brett Favre.:bolt::smug:

 

[FirstTimer]

You were just in too big of a hurry to stroke your own cock in this thread and got busted by the facts so you desperately cross post a different thread to draw attention from your fail.

The fail is all yours dickhead.

Because clearly all those Bears games I posted never occured.......

Again.

You're a joke.

Just stop.

 

[NAHSTE]

(I know, I didn't think he had any [credibility] left either. But don't worry, in a few more posts it will be all dried up.)

...

Monday Night Football - 1990 to Present

Maybe you should have looked at some historical data before you started getting too full of yourself. Between 1990 and 2004, there were ZERO games scheduled on MNF in cold weather markets the last 3 weeks of the season. In 2005, the NFL scheduled 2 to end the season, Packers @ Ravens and Patriots @ Jets but both involved teams that play outdoors in cold weather markets. Then there were no more until the Bears ended the 2008 season with the Packers and 2009 season with the Vikings. The 2009 season was the first time in more than 20 years that the NFL had a dome team playing a night game outdoors in a cold weather market on MNF in the last 3 weeks of the season.

Sunday Night Football is excluded since the league allows that game to be flexed from the best matchups in week 7 and beyond each year and isn't final when the league posts the schedule each April.

So out of the 60 MNF games in the last 3 weeks of the season between 1990-2010, only 4 have been played in cold weather markets at night in the last 3 weeks of the season. I would call a 93.4% scheduling rate a rule of thumb.

wait for it ...

What makes you think that the Sunday Night Football data is going to be drastically different?

almost there...

You were just in too big of a hurry to stroke your own cock in this thread and got busted by the facts so you desperately cross post a different thread to draw attention from your fail. I was a lot more right about the average hits a QB takes in a game than you were about the frequency of cold weather night games

almost there...

You're a joke.

Just stop.

There it is.

 

[MrBill]

Because clearly all those Bears games I posted never occured.......

Again.

You're a joke.

Just stop.

The Bears games are accounted for in the extremely small percentage. Why don't you do some research before you start sucking your own dick next time?

 

[Senser81]

The Bears games are accounted for in the extremely small percentage. Why don't you do some research before you start sucking your own dick next time?

 

[FirstTimer]

The Bears games are accounted for in the extremely small percentage.

Odd. Because you specifically mentioned Bears games.

Why would I look into any others?

I'll let some Packers fans look into their schedule.

Fail.

Yet again.

 

[NAHSTE]

The Bears games are accounted for in the extremely small percentage. Why don't you do some research before you start sucking your own dick next time?

But you can suck Brett Favre's dick without research? I find it laughable that you said he takes 20-30 hits a game.

I also find it laughable that you tried to pretend he takes hits in practice too as if nobody would call you on it.

Just stop.

You really are a joke. Well, you already were a joke but now you're even more of one.

 

[FirstTimer]

But you can suck Brett Favre's dick without research? I find it laughable that you said he takes 20-30 hits a game.

I also find it laughable that you tried to pretend he takes hits in practice too as if nobody would call you on it.

Just stop.

You really are a joke. Well, you already were a joke but now you're even more of one.

Quit sucking your dick.

 

[BigHouseUSA]

But you can suck Brett Favre's dick without research? I find it laughable that you said he takes 20-30 hits a game.

I also find it laughable that you tried to pretend he takes hits in practice too as if nobody would call you on it.

Just stop.

You really are a joke. Well, you already were a joke but now you're even more of one.

Do some research on how laughable you really think these are.

 

[FirstTimer]

Do some research on how laughable you really think these are.

Or do you mean Monday Night Laughable?

 

[NAHSTE]

Do some research on how laughable you really think these are.

I was closer to being right about how laughable those statements were than you were about me needing to research!