If I had to compare Vick to see what is fair I would say he deserves less than whatever Donte Stallworth gets. Donte is who should get nailed, Donte took human life through drunk driving and that is way worse then dogfighting I am sorry. Whatever happens to Vick it needs to be less than Stallworth is getting.
You're confusing the end result with the events leading up to the end result.
I'm smart enough to be able to separate the two.
The end result of losing a human life is worse than the end result of dogs dieing. I agree with this.
But let's compare the two:
The events leading up to the end result, well let's use two examples and then we can get to the Stallworth, Vick specifics.
There are two guys re-roofing a house. One guy slips and slides into his buddy, causing his buddy to fall off the roof and his buddy dies.
Across the street is a guy that steals neighborhood cats, ties them down to a board, and slowly cuts the cats skin away while the cat screams in pain and slowly dies..
Your backwards logic would execute the guy that accidentally slips on the roof, and let the guy murdering cats off scott free, just because the end result of the person dieing was worse.
Now let's look at Stallworth vs Vick.
Stallworth's crime was driving under the influence. You still have to, as an investigator, judge and jury, have to look at what the likely causes of the accident was, You look at, what condition the driver was in. You look at WHERE THE GUY WAS when he got hit. And the guy was illegally running out in front of traffic, onto a VERY busy highway very late at night. Donte was wrong (and criminally wrong) for driving under the influence. It was an accident that was in part was caused by the pedestrian that was also illegally crossing the street. Here there was no intent to harm anyone.
M. Vick took pleasure in torturing animals. He took a sick, sadistic, evil pleasure in electrocuting, drowning, hanging, and slamming dogs to their death. He trained, and forced dogs to fight to the death. He organized an illegal gambling ring around these sick acts. And he did this repeatedly over the course of many years. So much for your first offense theory. It takes a very special person to intentionally bring that kind of harm to a living being, whether it's human or a domesticated animal, and especially take a sick pleasure in it. M.Vick was not convicted of Dog fighting or abuse of animals as far as I know, he was only convicted of the gambling, But all of this was part of his confession, after he realized he was not going to lie his way out of trouble. He confessed to all this.
Can you see a difference in intent. One was accidental, and the pedestrian had a significant role in causing his own death.
The other was intentional and pure evil.
It's a good thing you're not a judge. Scary thing is that you could end up on a jury.