In fairness to myself, I said that I was intrigued by Gears and that I was happy that they finally learned how to tell a story. Now, I did enjoy the story overall, but that's really apples and oranges here anyway. UC2 pre blue people was some of the best storytelling in an adventure game I've ever seen. So I hold UC3 to a bit higher level. It's like how Dragon Age 2 has a pretty good story, but in comparison to the first I thought it was pretty bad because the expectation was so high.
And spare me on the Gears story can't hold a candle to this. They are both pretty action movieish. I think I liked Gears story a little more because my expectations were pretty low.
And I think it's funny that you WANT questions for future games, when in most cases you would be complaining that you have to buy more games to get the full story.
I went in with mixed expectations because everything I saw of it screamed of UC2. I critique things I think are worth critiquing. You seem to be so intent on defending this. This games single player had just as many flaws as Gears 3, a game you would give a 4/5, yet because it's UC you'll turn a blind eye to it. Seems a little silly. UC3 is a very good game, but not as good as UC2 and in my personal opinion if they do a 4th and don't change it up, I'll probably not play it. Just like I won't play the next Gears game. Or the next Batman game if they do the same shit (although I think I enjoyed Arkham City more than UC3).