All of you pissed off about this have missed one very important piece of the puzzle. Maynard touched on this briefly but Stallworth may not have gotten any time at all had he taken it to trial. The prosecution didn't have a particularly strong case. They did good to get the 30 days jail time plus the other stipulations. The victim's family probably knew this as well and realized he'd likely get off scott-free in court so of course they were happy with a financial settlement and a plea bargain.
Yes, having money helped his situation and afforded him a good lawyer. He was also smart enough to reach out to the victim's family and cooperate with the law as much as possible.
With all of that, it seems that the prosecution got it right because they got as much out of it as they could. Besides that, what message does it send to future offenders if you take a guy who cooperated as much as possible and nail him to the wall?
In light of all those facts, I actually think NFL commish Goodell has it wrong. He seems to be making an example of a guy for no reason other than making himself look tough. I expected a suspension but I figured it would be something like 8 games, or one year max. The legal system has run its course yet he feels the need to go far above and beyond what they did. Whatever he ultimately decides (indefinite is a bit vague) will be interesting because he has two big issues looming: Michael Vick and Plaxico Burress. So I still expect something in that one year range for Stallworth. This will allow the possibility of stiffer supensions for the other two, Vick in particular who was already found guilty (as opposed to Stallworth who took a plea). Burress just seems to be delaying the end of his career since a gun charge in NY carries mandatory jail time plus whatever Goodell comes up with. We'll see.
Yes, having money helped his situation and afforded him a good lawyer. He was also smart enough to reach out to the victim's family and cooperate with the law as much as possible.
With all of that, it seems that the prosecution got it right because they got as much out of it as they could. Besides that, what message does it send to future offenders if you take a guy who cooperated as much as possible and nail him to the wall?
In light of all those facts, I actually think NFL commish Goodell has it wrong. He seems to be making an example of a guy for no reason other than making himself look tough. I expected a suspension but I figured it would be something like 8 games, or one year max. The legal system has run its course yet he feels the need to go far above and beyond what they did. Whatever he ultimately decides (indefinite is a bit vague) will be interesting because he has two big issues looming: Michael Vick and Plaxico Burress. So I still expect something in that one year range for Stallworth. This will allow the possibility of stiffer supensions for the other two, Vick in particular who was already found guilty (as opposed to Stallworth who took a plea). Burress just seems to be delaying the end of his career since a gun charge in NY carries mandatory jail time plus whatever Goodell comes up with. We'll see.