The last few pages have had some good old fashion MM arguments. Some thoughts...
-Hogle, I thought you were leaving the thread? You should. To laugh at the notion of Fedor being Top 3 P4P just shows you are either a MMA noob who has never seen him fight, or a troll. This would be like saying that Tiger Woods is not a Top 3 golfer, or Roger Federer isnt Top 3 in tennis. It's laughable, stupid, and you can't be taken seriously. Go back to the kids table,grown ups are talking.
-JeremyHight and rob are arguing over nothing, because themain point each is trying to make is correct. Casual fans don't really care about Affliction, because they have no marketable stars and no TV to build any. However, rob's point that it's hard to call yourself a hardcore fan if you dont find a way to watch this show is also true. It's a huge show. It's cant miss, and the Fedor result will set the tone for how things fall in 2010.
-With that said, i'm amazed that Affliction has managed to draw 100k buys for each of the first two shows. I attribute this to Tim Sylvia and AA moreso than Fedor. Due to UFC exposure, they are by far the two most marketable names that Affliction has used. Those two wins have now elevated Fedor to the point that he can now draw on his own, and Affliction III will prove that, because Josh Barnett means nothing for business, and nothing else on the card even resembles a draw.
Need proof Fedor was a non draw before he beat the UFC guys?
Fedor vs. Coleman for PRIDE did 50,000 buys.
Fedor vs. Lindland for BodogFight did so few buys, no estimate exists.
And both of those promotions had tv (albeit weak tv that nobody watched, particulary Bodog) to promote the fights.
I'm picking Barnett. I'll be the first, and maybe only, to do so. I think he'll catch a sub, and millions of dollars will go POOF when Fedor taps. Dana & Brock will cry.