So......

[Primetime]

Manning
Rivers
Brady
Brees
Ben/Rodgers Tie

I still have it 1a/1b Brady and Manning. Rivers #3 right now.

 

[inthecards21]

Aaron Rodgers is the kind of QB who needs everything to be working

so having your #1 RB out, terrible O-Line and zero running game qualifies as having everything working?

 

[Colonel Angus]

You can homer all you want, because Ben is
Aaron Rodgers is the kind of QB who needs everything to be working - when guys like Ben, Kurt Warner, can take a bad situation, and make it better.

I hope no one is comparing Rodgers to Ben or Warner...

 

[mgoblue2290]

"I heard you fags were talking about the 2nd best QB in the NFC North. Have no fear, White Vick is here!"

 

[Primetime]

You can homer all you want, because Ben is a better NFL quarterback than Rodgers. He can make a bad situation good, when Aaron Rodgers holds onto the ball far too long at times, because his lack of pocket awareness.

Aaron Rodgers is the kind of QB who needs everything to be working - when guys like Ben, Kurt Warner, can take a bad situation, and make it better.

This was made obvious when Rodgers was facing 4th down and his last chance of the game when he threw an absolute seed to Jordy Nelson for the game tying touchdown a couple weeks ago after having to scramble out of the pocket to buy time.

 

[Nukleopatra]

Another point - Sam Bradford has something Aaron Rodgers does not: a very good running threat. .

Again, by even comparing the two at this point, is just proving me right. By now, Aaron Rodgers should be more comparable to quarterbacks who aren't rookies, and playing for a 1-15 team. Of course, at this time, Rodgers is better than Sam Bradford.

But I'm not even sure if Aaron Rodgers is better than guys like Tony Romo or David Garrard... David Garrard has playoff experience - David Garrard is winning a division with Peyton Manning in it. Why did Prime laugh at Garrard's name being mentioned? What has Rodgers done, other than posting empty stats every single season?

 

[Primetime]

Again, by even comparing the two at this point, is just proving me right. By now, Aaron Rodgers should be more comparable to quarterbacks who aren't rookies, and playing for a 1-15 team. Of course, at this time, Rodgers is better than Sam Bradford.

But I'm not even sure if Aaron Rodgers is better than guys like Tony Romo or David Garrard... David Garrard has playoff experience - David Garrard is winning a division with Peyton Manning in it. Why did Prime laugh at Garrard's name being mentioned? What has Rodgers done, other than posting empty stats every single season?

Solid reason to throw Sam Bradford in the top 10 and compare Rodgers to Garrard. You're running out of material Nuk, and you didn't have much to begin with.

 

[Primetime]

So Garrard is a near top 10 QB because Peyton Manning is struggling. Sounds legit.

 

[citizenerased]

Solid reason to throw Sam Bradford in the top 10 and compare Rodgers to Garrard. You're running out of material Nuk, and you didn't have much to begin with.

So say's the guy who has posted 26 times in this thread in less then 3 hours.

 

[Nukleopatra]

Solid reason to throw Sam Bradford in the top 10 and compare Rodgers to Garrard. You're running out of material Nuk, and you didn't have much to begin with.

I fully expect Sam Bradford to be a much better NFL quarterback, winning wise, than Aaron Rodgers, so I just threw him on the list. But if we're going by right now, the last few seasons - what makes Aaron Rodgers so much better than David Garrard? You laughed, and highlighted Garrards name, so we'll use him as an example.

I'll play along - David Garrard is a better nfl quarterback than Aaron Rodgers.

Prove me wrong.

 

[Colonel Angus]

He brought GB back on a brilliant drive that should have forced OT against "NFC's best team" only to have special teams and defense blow it.

He brought the team back in that playoff shootout last year only to have the defense blow it.

He kept an injury depleted team afloat despite injuries to many of his offensive weapons.

He's not perfect. He has many flaws. He holds on to the ball too long. He needs to learn to slide. But he's a damn good quarterback.

 

[inthecards21]

enough with the garrard BS, hes got the best running game in the league in a divison with Houston, Tennessee and a struggling Colts team with a ton of injuries. In NO way is the Jaguars success because of Garrard

 

[Atlas]

for some reason, i have always pictured nuk to look like this:

continue trolling meow...

 

[Primetime]

So say's the guy who has posted 26 times in this thread in less then 3 hours.

And what does that have to do with running out of material for an obvious troll attempt?

 

[citizenerased]

He brought GB back on a brilliant drive that should have forced OT against "NFC's best team" only to have special teams and defense blow it.

He brought the team back in that playoff shootout last year only to have the defense blow it.

Who do you blame for the Vikings NFC Championship loss last year?

 

[kmanharris]

This was made obvious when Rodgers was facing 4th down and his last chance of the game when he threw an absolute seed to Jordy Nelson for the game tying touchdown a couple weeks ago after having to scramble out of the pocket to buy time.

Your homerism again making Rodgers seem like a God.

I am not arguing that the pass was perfect and a bullet but let's not get carried away with him "scrambling to buy time." He was facing a 3 man rush. A 3 man rush that gave up midway through the play and gave Rodgers 6 or 7 seconds to sit back there.

<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Q7cC-9LZX00?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Q7cC-9LZX00?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>

In fact, he didn't even have to scramble, he just side stepped towards the sideline and waited for someone to get open. Still a bullet of a pass but don't act like he single-handidly (sp?) tied the game by himself.

 

[bucky]

Sam Bradford could possible end the season with more division titles.

Funny thing is, he could do it with a losing record. Damn, how bad is the NFC West? St. Louis is improving. Glad to see it for S. Jackson's sake.

 

[Nukleopatra]

enough with the garrard BS, hes got the best running game in the league in a divison with Houston, Tennessee and a struggling Colts team with a ton of injuries. In NO way is the Jaguars success because of Garrard

So, the Jags success has nothing to do with Garrard's 65% completion %, 93.2 QB rating (almost as good as Rodgers.) David Garrard also has a bad line, crap WRs, and was sacked just as much as Aaron Rodgers.

I'm still not sold - I say Garrard is just as good, maybe better than Aaron Rodgers.

Prove me wrong.

 

[Primetime]

Your homerism again making Rodgers seem like a God.

I am not arguing that the pass was perfect and a bullet but let's not get carried away with him "scrambling to buy time." He was facing a 3 man rush. A 3 man rush that gave up midway through the play and gave Rodgers 6 or 7 seconds to sit back there.

<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Q7cC-9LZX00?fs=1&hl=en_US"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Q7cC-9LZX00?fs=1&hl=en_US" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>

In fact, he didn't even have to scramble, he just side stepped towards the sideline and waited for someone to get open. Still a bullet of a pass but don't act like he single-handidly (sp?) tied the game by himself.

I said he scrambled out of the pocket to buy time....which he did. He didn't sprint or evade 10 defenders. Never said something like that. It was a great pass and a great play and you can't argue with that by any means.

 

[Nukleopatra]

Aaron Rodgers is 5 games over .500 as starter, zero playoff wins.
David Garrard is 3 games over .500 as starter, one playoff win.

I'm just trying to find out why Prime would bold Garrards name and laugh.

Prime?