soooo..moss to vikings.......v jax to new england?

[Tailback U]

Some talk about Vincent Jackson being traded for Logan Mankins who is currently holding out for the Patriots. Jackson would need to be signed by the Chargers for this to happen. I wouldn't mind this from the Patriots standpoint because it's basically like getting Jackson for free. Mankins won't do anything this year and they won't resign him.

Also some rumors about Deion Branch being possibly traded back to the Patriots. I guess they do have a plan, rather than keep the receiving core at an average height of 5'9".

What? Deon Branch is 5'9".

 

[Fox1994]

Jackson caught 21.4% of Rivers completions, while Moss caught 22.3% of Brady's. Why is that 0.9% such a big showing in how much better Moss supposedly is? He caught slightly amount more of his completions. I have also used plenty of factual information. If factual information in this discussion is merely stats then this is a retarded discussion to be having.

So he caught 0.9% more passes? That means he was a bigger part of an offense with better supporting options to compete with for passes.

And yes, you're using facts, they're just not doing too well to support your argument.

 

[Scorask]

So he caught 0.9% more passes? That means he was a bigger part of an offense with better supporting options to compete with for passes.

And yes, you're using facts, they're just not doing too well to support your argument.

This is a very good point, considering that Welker has lead the league in receptions for the past 3 seasons. Its funny because the stats he keeps throwing out there seem to contradict his argument.

Edit- And again I have to add that Moss was primarily double covered.

 

[Fox1994]

This is a very good point, considering that Welker has lead the league in receptions for the past 3 seasons. Its funny because the stats he keeps throwing out there seem to contradict his argument.

Edit- And again I have to add that Moss was primarily double covered.

:yep: You're basically restating everything I have. Haha. Moss has to compete with better options and was double covered, and was still a literal bigger part of his team's offense.

And, further, like you said, the stats don't defend the argument.

 

[Scorask]

:yep: You're basically restating everything I have. Haha. Moss has to compete with better options and was double covered, and was still a literal bigger part of his team's offense.

And, further, like you said, the stats don't defend the argument.

I was just agreeing with you and added the tidbit about Welker. I already mentioned the BS completion % argument a few pages back, adding that Moss was primarily double/triple covered, where Jackson mostly see's single coverage, lol.

 

[Fox1994]

I was just agreeing with you and added the tidbit about Welker. I already mentioned the BS completion % argument a few pages back, adding that Moss was primarily double/triple covered, where Jackson mostly see's single coverage, lol.

Ya, and thank you for that. :2thumbs:

 

[Woy]

8 catches, 213 yards, 1 TD for Malcolm Floyd on Sunday.

Yeah, San Diego misses that top 10 receiver who's supposedly better than Randy Moss.

 

[Tailback U]

8 catches, 213 yards, 1 TD for Malcolm Floyd on Sunday.

Yeah, San Diego misses that top 10 receiver who's supposedly better than Randy Moss.

Like I said, Aso will be saying Malcolm Floyd is better than Larry Fitzgerald after this season.

Who knew that an undrafted receiver from the University of Wyoming could replace one of the best wide receivers in the NFL.